Appendix C
The "Dark Gift"
The Truth behind the Legends of the Vampires and the "Fallen Angels"
To Hunger, but not for food; to Thirst, but not for drink... or blood
by True Male Multiorgasmic Response [http://www.rephaim.org]
A "Physiologically Impossible" Male?
As documented in the published Rutgers study, the male
research Subject was born without a Male Refractory Period (MRP), thus
possessing a unique sexual physiology — one previously thought only to be
possessed by women and previously considered "physiologically impossible" for
men.
As with multiorgasmic women, he enjoys a sexual capacity that never requires a
"down" time, that never desires "rest" following any number of natural, fully
ejaculatory orgasms; an orgasmic insatiability which has previously only been
recorded and referenced in the ancient myths of the Rephaim: the truth behind
the legends of the Slavic Vampire (i.e., Upir' and Nosferatu {Nesuferit}). Yet while these terms are Slavic in origin, this "Dark" progeny is not. Nor can the truth regarding them be found in Church-sponsored superstitions, Stoker's or Rice's fiction, or in Hollywood's myriad re-inventions and the blatant exploitation and commercialization of all such.
How Rare Is This MRP-Free Capacity?
Is this Research Subject the only male without MRP? We seriously doubt it. He
is, however, the first and still only adult male to have this supposedly
"physiologically impossible" sexual capacity scientifically documented.
Whether this capacity is merely rare or completely unprecedented, the fact
remains that prior to this study all previous documented instances, claims, or
studies of male 'multiorgasmic' ability from ancient history to today has
reference to the interrupted multiple orgasms made possible through the use of
ejaculatory-control techniques. This study stands alone as the first to
successfully document the legitimacy of this "impossible" ability and provides a
foundational premise upon which to base future research into the actual
psycho-physiologic triggers of the Male Refractory Period.
However, while this is the first documented scientific study of natural male
multiorgasmic capacity, ancient history and the myths of gothic "horror" both
provide intriguing accounts of an astounding hypothesis as to the true origins
of this "impossible" male sexual capacity.
What Vampires Historically Were Not ...
"... Enlightenment be the gate, Almeya, the Path, and we, the Rephaim,
its sole guardians. Consider well what you ask. For once imparted, we are yours
and you, ours."
[Book of Azazel, Ch. 23, V. 4]
Perhaps never more than where vampires are concerned, the truth is indeed far stranger and far more provocative than any fiction.
Of course, to find the truth, one must begin by first researching the origins and the earliest Roma (Gypsy) accounts wherein no fangs, no fear of crucifixes, no energy feeding, and no blood drinking were reported. These original accounts as well as the best information regarding the Slavic Vampire can most comprehensively be found in the following seminal publications:
Vampires of the Slavs - Dr. Jan Perkowski
The Darkling: A Treatise on Slavic Vampirism - Dr. Jan Perkowski
The Vampire: A Casebook - Dr. Alan Dundes
Vampires, Burial, and Death: Folklore and Reality - Dr. Paul Barber
The Vampire Book: The Encyclopedia of the Undead - J. Gordon Melton
Slayers and Their Vampires: A Cultural History of Killing the Dead - Dr. Bruce McClelland
(Please note all authors above hold Ph.Ds in their respective academic and medical fields... unlike such culturally considered or self-proclaimed vampire "experts" as Bram Stoker, Anne Rice, Stephanie Meyer, Michelle Belanger, etc.)
The Actual Historical Slavic Vampire: The Truth Behind the Fictions
The Slavic Vampire: the Only Actual Vampire Archetype
Despite the claims from most "vampirologists" and other vampire "experts" that vampiric beings existed in the folklore of almost all cultures, worldwide, the fact is that the "vampire" did not exist outside the Slavic countries:
"These writers, and others, established the notion that 'every culture has a form of vampire belief', that 'vampires' were a universal, even archetypal human superstition, and that they were found world- and history-wide, buried in every body of myth, hidden in every holy book, lurking behind every fairy-tale.
"And of course, they were quite wrong!!! The folklorists managed this feat by taking each separate element of the vampire metaphor and using it to qualify as a 'type of vampire' absolutely anything whatsoever that fitted even one aspect of the definition.
Was it a supernatural being that drank blood? Then it's a 'type of vampire'! Was
it something that came back from the grave? Then it's a 'type of vampire'! Was
it an entity or revenant that was 'hungry' or that pestered the living for sex?
Then it's a 'type of vampire'! Never mind that the individual cultures concerned
had complex histories and belief systems to which these 'types of vampire'
really belonged. They all got lumped together, and suddenly the word 'vampire'
included at least half of the myths, legends, and folklore ever known on the
planet. Child-killing demons, blood-drinking gods, hungry ancestor spirits,
cannibalistic demons, fierce animal ghosts, night-hag entities, incubi/succubi,
the restless dead, plague demons...these and many other very culture-specific
beliefs, all with their own context and history, suddenly became part of the
definition of 'vampire'." [http://www.sanguinarius.org/articles/vampdef.shtml] (emphasis added)
As revealed in the quotes above declared by real vampirologists and professional Slavicists, the actual Vampire of Central and Eastern Europe, from whence the term "Vampire" actually originates, was not a fanged blood-drinking being who feared daylight and/or crucifixes. All such definitions are the result of later Westernized fictions and Hollywood re-inventions.
In response to this growing realization by those who still cling to such fictional portrayals and definitions, claims have been made that vampires actually predate by millennia the Eastern European Vampire. This is argued by referring to ancient tales of mythological creatures who either drink and/or eat flesh and blood and/or who supposedly possessed fangs, perhaps rose from the grave, or otherwise might possess any other trait that resembled those reputed to be vampiric.
The attempt to salvage such discredited fictionalized traits by trying to equate and link them with diverse myths from disparate ancient cultures worldwide of the "Vampire" as a fanged blood drinker is both illogical and irresponsible, as pointed out so effectively at the website Sanguinarius.com:
"Was it a supernatural being that drank blood? Then it's a 'type of vampire'! Was it something that came back from the grave? Then it's a 'type of vampire'! Was it an entity or revenant that was 'hungry' or that pestered the living for sex? Then it's a 'type of vampire'!
"Never mind that the individual cultures concerned had complex histories and belief systems to which these 'types of vampire' really belonged. They all got lumped together, and suddenly the word 'vampire' included at least half of the myths, legends, and folklore ever known on the planet.
"As this website quite correctly concludes: And of course, they were quite wrong!!! The folklorists managed this feat by taking each separate element of the vampire metaphor and using it to qualify as a 'type of vampire' absolutely anything whatsoever that fitted even one aspect of the definition."
(emphasis added)
There is also an additional yet key logical fallacy involved here... that of thinking you can find vampires in antiquity by seeking only mythical beings exhibiting the modern, Western pop-culture version of the "Vampire."
To illustrate by analogy, let's parallel the common claim of seeking and finding "ancient" Vampires by using only modern reinventions with trying to do the same with another equally iconic Western mythological figure: "Santa Claus." Like the Vampire, "Santa Claus" is likewise founded on very solid historical real-life origins. And like the Vampire, Santa has been reinvented so repeatedly as to be completely unrecognizable to anyone living even 100 years ago.
Imagine were you to attempt finding ancient versions of "Santa Claus" in other cultures — but confining your search only to the far-later Western re-inventions of him as some jolly, old, fat White guy in a red suit, living at the North Pole and riding a sleigh driven by eight flying reindeer. How successful could you possibly be? And while you might find some ancient parallels on one or another of these wholly modern traits, yet if this is your definition of Santa Claus... then you are NEVER going to even come close to finding Santa's actual historical origin: Saint Nicholas, a 4th-Century Christian Greek bishop.
Vampires did not Drink Blood
As revealed in the non-fiction books above, the surprising fact is that blood drinking by vampires was not actually reported in the original historical accounts of Central and Eastern Europe or Russia, the true "homelands" of the Vampire.
Actual Slavic Vampire of Romania's Transylvania was not a blood drinker:
"Vukanovic, whose Serbian Gypsy vampire beliefs is one of the most detailed studies that we have, never once mentions blood-sucking. This supposed trait seems to be merely a folkloric means of accounting for two things: unexplained deaths and the appearance of blood on the mouth of a corpse." [Dr. Paul Barber. Vampires, Burial, and Death: Folklore and Reality, pg. 100]
"There are no bloodsuckers in Romanian tradition." [Romanian Professor, Dr. Sabina Ispas.
"Could We Reshape the Image of Evil in the Post-industrial Society?", 2000 World
Dracula Congress]
"The weird thing is, in actual panics, where people thought the 'vampire' was right there and active, there are almost no stories about blooddrinking. 'Vampires' were the hungry dead." [http://www.sanguinarius.org]
Well... if the actual vampire -- the historical Transylvanian Vampire, the
actual vampire archetype from Transylvania, Romania -- was not "hungry" for
blood, then... for what?
You're about to find out the truth.
As ought to be apparent, if we really seek to understand the Vampire of history, if we wish to have any hope of unveiling this fascinating, possibly paranormal being out of the darkness of modern fiction and pop-culture iconography and into the blinding light of day, should we not then start at the very beginning by first researching the origins of the term, VAMPIRE, itself? After all, only those who coined the term could possibly have known what they meant by it and what sort of person was being described.
But... can we do this? Is such a task possible? Fortunately for us, it actually appears that it is.
Upir Likhyj: History's First Recorded Vampire
The earliest written form from which we get the modern word "Vampire" is the Slavic word "Upir" and first appeared in print in 1047 CE (easily predating all other "Vampire" stories by centuries and Stoker's iconic "Dracula" by over 800 years). Surprisingly, the term does not refer to any mythological being or to any supernatural entity. Instead, the reference is to an actual living person... the author, himself.
In this text, the author calls himself by the name of "Upir" (this later became "Vapir" in Bulgaria and then "Vampir"). As it turns out, this 11th-Century author was not at all a blood-drinking, fang-wielding, crucifix-fearing, "undead" servant of Satan risen from the grave. In fact, he was about as far from it as one can imagine.
The first-ever "vampire" specifically mentioned in recorded history was — as he so declared himself to be — a bonafide Eastern Orthodox CHRISTIAN Priest! At the time he wrote this, he was personally working for Vladimir II of Russia in translating religious and
Biblical texts from Glagolitic into Cyrillic.
In 1047 CE, after transcribing a particular book of scripture for Vladimir II, this Novgorodian priest wrote in his own hand as follows:
"Glory unto Thee Lord, Heavenly Tsar, that you enabled me to write this book from the Cyrillic for Prince Vladimir, of the Novgorod principality, son of Yaroslav the Great. I began to write in the year 6555 (i.e., 1047 CE), on the 14th of May, and finished the same year, November 19th, I, Father Upir Likhyj. With this I pray that all will read this prophecy. For great are the marvels written down for us by the prophets in these books. Be healthy, o prince, live forever, but of the one writing this do not forget." (emphasis added)
That's right... Father Upir Likhyj. In other words: Father Vampire.
Of course, being that he was both a living mortal man AND an orthodox Christian priest, it becomes immediately apparent that the term Upir' ("Vampir") could not possibly have meant then what it later came to mean several centuries, thereafter. So... the obvious question becomes: What might Upir' Likhyj have meant at the time this was written? What was its English translation?
The investigation prompted by this question revealed the following rather provocative results:
The nationality (or rather, etymology) of the name is both Russian and Bulgarian. While at first mistakenly thought to find origin in the verb "to drink," instead its true roots are more properly founded in the Slavic verb pir', meaning "to feast." Thus, the term "Upir" literally means "one who feasts." But... feasts on what? As we have already seen clearly stated by actual Slavicists and vampirologists, there were no blood drinkers in Transylvanian (Romanian) tradition and no witnessed account of blood drinking even during the actual "vampire panics" of the time.
So... if the term "Vampire" originally meant "feaster" ("one who feasts"), to what did this refer? As we now know it wasn't blood, given that there is no actual evidence outside of fiction that vampires drank blood, what did the historical Vampire "feast" upon?
Again, a study of the actual Gypsy accounts throughout Central and Eastern European provide the highly provocative answers to this incredibly poignant question.
The Slavic Vampire: a Sexually "Insatiable" Race?
The Slavic vampire was described in the original legends as "hungry" ... but, not for blood. Instead, he was hungry for sex... and lots of it:
"The vampire of folklore is a sexual creature, and his sexuality is obsessive– indeed, in Yugoslavia... he is apt to wear out his widow with his intentions, so that she too pines away, much like his other victims." [Vampires, Burial and Death: Folklore and Reality; P. Barber, 1988; p. 9]
"Gypsies believed some vampires (the Nosferati) had an insatiable sexual appetite and would return from the grave to have sexual relations with their widow or a young woman of their choosing." [The Vampire Book, J. Gordon Melton, 1999; p. 616]
"The folklore of Russia also described the vampire as a sexual being. Among the ways in which it made itself known was to appear in a village as a handsome young man. Circulating among the young people in the evening, the vampire lured unsuspecting women to their doom." [ibid.; p. 617] (emphasis added)
"Gypies thought of the vampire as a sexual entity. The male vampire was believed to have such an intense sexual drive that his sexual need alone was sufficent to bring him back from the grave. His first act usually was to return to his widow, whom he engaged in sexual intercourse. Nightly visits could ensue over a period of time, with the wife becoming exhausted and emaciated." [ibid.; pp. 616-617] (emphasis added)
"Male vampires were known to have a strong sexual appetite and returned from the dead to have sexual relations with a wife, girlfriend, or other women. Female vampires were thought to be able to return from the dead and assume a normal life, even to the point of marrying -- though her husband would become exhausted from satisfying her sexual demands."
[ibid.; p. 313] (emphasis added)
"The sexual nature of the act is plainly indicated in the following examples. Heinrich von Wlislocki*, in his researches into Roumanian superstitions tells us: ...With young people it (The Nosferat) indulges in sexual orgies until they get ill and die of exhaustion. It often happens that women are impregnated by this creature and bear children..." [On the Nightmare, E. Jones, pp. 117-118] (emphasis added) * a noted Austrian Gypsologist, from his publication Roumanian Superstitions, 1861 CE
( Note: If true that women indulged "...until they get ill and die of exhaustion", then how is it these same women were still alive nine months later to "bear children"? Obviously, this accusation is anything but truthful and was intended to falsely incite the populaces to violence against those vilified as "Vampires." )
"Mullos (Gypsy word for Vampire) also return to satisfy their prodigious sexual appetites... They are so insatiable that their human partners are likely to weaken and become ill with exhaustion." [The Complete Vampire Companion (R Guiley, pp. 9-10)] (emphasis added)
When viewed in light of the unlimited, natural multiorgasmic capacity, the
reports of a Slavic vampire's lovers/"victims" "becoming exhausted and
emaciated" and thus "likely to weaken and become ill with ("sexual")
exhaustion" finally make sense, taking on an entirely new and highly erotic
significance: this was not the disease "Consumption" (Tuberculosis) at all. As
the "vampiric" activities were reported to be sexual in nature, what could cause
such exhaustion and emaciation in female "victims"?
There can be but one
logical conclusion: continuous multiorgasmic sex over a period of days.
This also cannot but call into question whether the "victims" were, in fact,
victims. Given that they were made "exhausted and emaciated" through such
presumably non-stop sexual congress, it cannot but be suggested that to arrive
at such a state, they themselves were most likely quite active and willing
participants in the multiorgasmic sexual activity. And if so, might this, rather
than fictional neckbites, etc., be the reason behind the reported devotion of
such female "familiars" to their "Vampire" Masters?
Was, perhaps, this
same intense female devotion the same as reportedly experienced anciently by
Human females to their "fallen angel" husbands? And might this devotion have had
as part of its motivation the sexual awakening and deeper emotional bonding made
possible through mutual multiorgasmic communion with such sexually (and
therefore, emotionally) equal males?
In fact, these "vampiric"
couplings do describe an ancient Rephaim sexual rite of communion (from which
was derived the Sumerian multiorgasmic "Hieros Gamos"
[Sacred Marriage] rite) in which its participants enjoyed literally days of
continual lovemaking, the participants experiencing the
euphoria of non-stop orgasms together day after day, night after night.
And during such multiorgasmic euphoria, like a drug the natural "high"
experienced builds to such emotional and sexual intensity and fulfillment that
none desires to "take food", preferring instead to continue on sexually, higher
and higher together, sexually and emotionally. Hence, the true source of the
symptoms of exhaustion and emaciation so often described.
Despite the
inaccuracy of the term Nosferatu in describing the Rephaim during this time
period, it would have seemed quite appropriate to the local populaces observing
women taken by a Nosferatu: the emaciated body, the listless endorphin-saturated
eyes, all evidences not of "consumption" but of days of multiorgasmic euphoria.
Thus as actually described by the inhabitants of Central and Eastern Europe, the very environs of the Vampire of History, the Vampire known to them was not a fanged blood-sucker but, instead, a highly libidinous being whose "insatiable," "prodigious sexual appetites" resulted in "sexual orgies" causing his lovers to "weaken and become ill with exhaustion", further becoming "exhausted and emaciated" as such non-stop multiorgasmic encounters continued, symptoms very similar to the dread disease "Consumption" (Tuberculosis), from whence the name, Nosferatu ("plague carrier") originates.
Upir Likhyj = "Insatiable Feaster"?
Might, then, this Eastern Orthodox Christian priest have been referring to feasting as a carefully crafted euphemism for sex? In investigating this possibility, I researched both Slavic as well as early Christian customs and was very surprised to discover that, indeed, Slavic "wedding feasts" of the period, at which most certainly Priests would have attended if not officiated, were often orgiastic in nature. Additionally, I learned that an even more ancient precedent to such sexually related feasts were the original Christian "Agape" feasts in which sexual orgies also took place, as often attested to with ironic shock by many Roman historians (look up the term "agape" online in wikipedia or other non-christian websites where more comprehensive explanations of same are permitted).
Thus, this priest, Father "Vampire," would have had a Christian precedent for using the term "feast" as referring specifically to sexual activity. Therefore, in perhaps its most accurate rendering, the term upir' did indeed have specific reference, albeit euphemistically and quite deliberately so, to the "feasting" described in the Christian version of the "Agape" (i.e., sexual feasting). This euphemistic Christian meaning would hardly have been unknown to this highly educated and literate Christian priest, Father Upir.
Additionally, given that the term Upir was the origin of the later evolution for our modern word "Vampire," a being who historically was defined throughout both Central and Eastern Europe as being sexually insatiable, it seems highly likely that the term... as used by this 11th Century priest... was originally intended to mean: "sexual feaster." This seems further validated when we investigate the second word thereafter in this priest's self-ascribed name.
The Russian term that follows Upir, namely the word Likhyj, is an adjective describing the preceding noun to which it applies and appears thusly in its original Russian form: Лихый. Unfortunately, the meaning of this Russian adjective has been strangely lost to history: it no longer exists.
However, I have successfully found two other instances in the 11th and 12th Centuries where this same adjective (Лихый) occurs. In both cases, this adjective is synonymous with adjectives as "never-ending," "intractable," or "prolonged"... or, if used sexually speaking... "insatiable."
Thus, "Father Upir Likhyj" would seem to mean "Insatiable Feaster."
While this nickname probably caused others around him to consider him a glutton of food, yet he might well have been hiding its rather hidden and inherently euphemistic sexual context that referred specifically to the same insatiable sexual capacity for which Vampires have since always been reputed to possess down through the many centuries thereafter and as might well have existed also during the original 1st-Century Christian Agape "feasts."
Of course, while we cannot know with certainty whether such euphemistic intent was present with the author when he so deliberately chose to call himself a "Vampire" (Upir), yet is it not amazingly coincidental that the term "Insatiable (sexual) Feaster" matches this same reputed and oft-reported insatiable sexual capacity for which the actual Vampire of Central and Eastern Europe was most known and identified throughout all Slavic lands and including Russia, as well?
What few here in the West know is that even up to present times, the actual peoples of Eastern Europe still view the vampire as primarily an insatiably sexual supernatural being. There are many 20th Century accounts of exactly how the modern peoples of Eastern Europe actually still define and view vampires, as can be read (a few of them anyway) here:
"In another case that took place during the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913, a farmer draped himself in a white shirt and white sheet and went round the villages for sexual liaisons with young women, introducing himself as a vampire. One night in the village of Zagradje, peasants chased him with guns and dogs, nearly killing him. Thus ended his career as a vampire."
As should be apparent, this farmer would not have fraudulently portrayed himself as a vampire by attempting "sexual liaisons with young women" unless that this were exactly how vampires, real vampires, actually acted and were known by those living in the very lands of the Vampire. Most likely, he was revealed to be a fraud because he... unlike real vampires... could not exhibit their characteristic "insatiable sexuality" (natural unlimited orgasmic capacity), which revealed his deception.
Notice that this imposter did not dress himself in black, wear fangs and try to drink anyone's blood. Only here in the West would people be ignorant and gullible enough to think that this would resemble an actual vampire!
That the term Upir Likhyj means "insatiable feaster, that later this term... Upir... eventually became the modern word "Vampire" (i.e., Upir... Vapir... Vampir... Vampire) and that ever since the 11th Century even up to today, the "Vampire" is primarily known to refer to a male with an "insatiable sexual appetite" must either be the truth behind the historic Vampire... or else the most improbable purely happenstance coincidence in history... and one spanning not only a single or a few separate instances but one perpetuated for almost two millennia throughout an entire large region of the world wherein near-continuous reports have been received during all that time up to the present day (well... at least up to the 1950s when the last such reported accounts were published).
So... It's All Just About the Sex?
No... Absolutely not.
The historical mystique, allure and romance of the real Vampire is not as a direct result of his unlmited orgasmic capacity but, instead, what such genetically potentiated capacity has done to expand and potentiate the "Vampire's" emotional and spiritual capacities to match... to the extent that they rise to equal that of the female. Thus, for the first time in Human history... both the female AND the male interact as equals on all levels.
In other words, only the "Vampire" is the true emotional, spiritual and sensual equal to the Human female. For only the Human female, like those males who are true genetic "Vampires," possess within unlimited capacity in all three intrinsically linked areas.
And as you are about to read, the evidence for this is found yet again in history and in the cultures found therein that were established by these original "Vampires" of history who founded Earth's first greatest civilizations and created them to be truly gylanic (i.e., gender equal) cultures ... all of which were hallmarked most by a particular "rite" or "ordinance" that openly demonstrated the same "insatiable sexual" capacity in their male leaders as was either required or venerated by the female leaders and females of those same cultures!
What now follows are the much-summarized results of almost two decades of historical research I have thus far undertaken in documenting throughout recorded Human history and in many parts of the world the existence of those uniquely gifted males later called ... "Vampires."
From "Fallen Angels" to "Vampires"
In the Beginning...
As the original Slavic accounts describe the actual historical Vampire as being sexually insatiable and capable of near-endless lovemaking (something of which normal males are physiologically incapable due to that pesky "down time" following an orgasm or two), instead of seeking out fictitious fanged blood-drinkers, ought we not to instead seek out in history any evidence of truly multiorgasmic men possessing the true "Dark Gift" of sexual insatiability for which the Vampire was really known?
When one does so, we find the "smoking-gun" historical evidence of exactly such a race of men almost immediately.
Before the empires of Rome, Persia, Babylon, and even Egypt, there existed the Sumerian Empire. Located where Iraq is now, and where Babylon would arise millennia thereafter, Sumer was where writing was first invented, where banking first was created, and where many of Humankind's first major advances as a civilized species took place. And according to their mythology, these many gifts of knowledge, science, mathematics, and even the sensual arts were provided them by beings who descended from the skies and taught them. Called the "Anunnake" ("Sons of the [heavenly] Prince"), they were the first to rule Sumer and their children after them.
Abraham of the Old Testament came from what was one of Sumer's primary cities: "Ur of the Chaldees," known to the Sumerians and still today as "Ur" in modern-day Iraq. And it was from Sumer that Abraham brought to Canaan many of Sumer's greatest claimed historical events and/or myths, including the account of the Great Flood, the Tower of Babel, and also the account of the Sumerian "Anunnake". In Canaan they were known by many names including the "bene ha elohim" (Sons of God[s]), the Nefilim (the "Fallen Ones"), and the Grigori ("Watchers"). However, they are perhaps best and most notoriously known, vilified, and remembered as the
The Watchers ("Fallen Angels").
The Watchers ("Fallen Angels") and their Offspring, The "Rephaim"
"Come with Me, as we fly high over the plastic houses
where men and their women disentangled lie like mismatched dolls, the
morning-after taste of disenchantment collecting tartly in their mouths."
[Doris Vallejo]
Beginning with the ancient accounts of "Fallen Angels" (more accurately: "The Watchers") descending from heaven to sexually enjoy human females, to their "demigod" (half-god, half-human) progeny, called "The Rephaim" (who -- following their expulsion from the Middle Eastern lands -- became the source of the myriad sex Gods of antiquity, and ultimately resulting in their vilification as vampiric "Nosferati" in possession of the ultimate sexual "Dark Gift"), this unlimited male sexual capacity has been genetically passed along through the Ages to the current day.
"The Watchers were "a specific race of divine beings known in Hebrew as
nun resh
'ayin, 'irin' (resh 'ayin, 'ir' in singular), meaning 'those who watch' or
'those who are awake', which is translated into Greek as Egrhgoroi egregoris or
grigori, meaning 'watchers'. These Watchers feature in the main within the pages
of pseudepigraphal and apocryphal works of Jewish origin, such as the Book of
Enoch and the Book of Jubilees." [Andrew Collins, From the Ashes of Angels — The Forbidden Legacy of a Fallen
Race (1996) p. 3]
"Book of Enoch" Chapter 6, Verses 1-8:
"And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days
were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters.
"And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and
lusted after them, and said
to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and
beget us children.'...
"And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the
summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn
and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it.
"And these are the names of their leaders: Samlazaz, their leader, Araklba,
Rameel, Kokablel, Tamlel, Ramlel, Danel, Ezeqeel, Baraqijal, Asael (Azazel),
Armaros, Batarel, Ananel, Zaqiel, Samsapeel, Satarel, Turel, Jomjael, Sariel.
These are their chiefs of tens."
This account is further verified and validated in the Bible:
"And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the ground, and
daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God(s) (bene ha-elohim or
"Watchers") saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them
wives of all that they chose." [Genesis 6:1-2] (emphasis added)
"...the sons of God(s) (bene ha-elohim) came in unto the daughters of men, and
they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old,
men of
renown." [Genesis 6:4] (emphasis added)
This ancient account, appearing not only in the Old Testament but also repeated
in much greater detail in the Book of Enoch, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the
Book of
Jubilees, and referenced repeatedly throughout the Bible, reports an event of
significant validity. As per these accounts, at some point anciently 200
"angels", led in part by Azazel (Azael) and called the "Sons of God" (sons of
Elohim) in the Old Testament, and intriguingly also referred to as "The
Watchers" and also "The Nephilim" (The Fallen Ones), became so sexually aroused
by human females that they could no longer constrain themselves, but descended
from the Heavens to Earth (touching down on "Ardis", presumably Mount Hermon),
forfeiting their "first estate" forever, and sexually enjoying human females
abundantly, thus causing fornication to run rampant despite the strict religious
laws forbidding same. Evidently these "fallen angels" were so sexually unique
from human males as to be almost irresistible to the females of the area,
thereby incurring the "wrath of God" upon them for having so completely
"corrupted" such females and thereafter taking from among them "wives of all
that they chose."
Their Gifts of Knowledge and Technology to Mankind
The Book of Enoch elaborates on the Watcher tradition from Genesis 6:1-4.
According to the Book of Enoch, the Watchers were angels in heaven who saw the
women on Earth and lusted after them. At their leader Semjaza’s request, two
hundred of them made a pact to descend from heaven, take the women as wives, and
beget children.
Regardless of what their true motivations might have been, they did apparently
"descend from heaven" and most certainly did lust after women and eventually at
some point married many of them and had children by them. However, this was not
all these "Watchers" did. According to the ancient texts from many different
sources, the 200 "Watchers" also imparted knowledge and technology to mankind
that had not previously existed among them, including:
• ...they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made
them acquainted with plants. [1 Enoch 7:2]
• Azazel taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and
made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and
bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the
eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures.
[1 Enoch 8:1]
•
Semjaza taught enchantments and root-cuttings, Armaros the resolving of
enchantments, Baraqijal (taught) astrology, Kokabel the constellations, Ezeqeel
the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiel the signs of the earth, Shamsiel the signs of the sun, and Sariel the course of the
moon. [1 Enoch 8:3]
Azazel's Unique Gift
A more complete account of the alleged activities by these "Watchers" can be
found in the Books of Enoch, among other ancient texts. Here follows a summary
of some of these activities:
"To the women he (Azazel) taught the art of 'beautifying' the eyelids, and the use of 'all kinds of costly stones' and 'colouring tinctures', indicating that before this time the wearing of make-up and jewelry was unknown. Through this unforgivable act, the Daughters of Men were believed to have been 'led astray', and because of it they became 'corrupt', committing fornication not only with the Watchers themselves, but also, it must be assumed*, with men who were not their regular partners. Azazel also stood accused of teaching women how to enjoy sexual pleasure and indulge in promiscuity - a blasphemy seen as 'godlessness' in the eyes of the Hebrew storytellers." ["From the Ashes of Angels", Collins, p. 25, 1996] (emphasis added)
* This is indeed an assumption, only. There is nothing to suggest that once
having experienced sex with these "Watchers," women suddenly became openly
promiscuous with men other than the "Watchers." And had such women committed
fornication with Hebrew men, such men would have been in equal violation of
their own Law and could hardly have then been taken seriously in vilifying and
condemning the "Watchers" for committing these same acts.
What "Sexual Pleasure" did Azazel "Teach"?
As stated previously, Azazel was accused of "...teaching women how to enjoy
sexual pleasure." Apart from the ridiculousness of considering such a crime, the
question must be asked: What sexual pleasures did Azazel introduce to females
that they had not known previously?
It would be ridiculous to assume that prior to the Watchers' arrival, women had
been unable to figure out what an orgasm was or how to "enjoy" such.
Additionally it would be equally ludicrous to think that the Watchers brought
with them some new form of sexual practice not already enjoyed to its most
decadent extreme by the many sexually hedonistic cultures that surrounded the
ancient Hebrews and with whom they at that time coexisted.
Thus the question remains: What did Azazel — and presumably his fellow
"Watchers" — teach women that they hadn't been able to learn with their
ordinary male lovers for the many hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of
years of Human existence? Obviously, there was a level of "sexual pleasure"
possible with these "Watchers" that women had never experienced prior to their
arrival. And while the many influences from the surrounding hedonistic cultures
had apparently not been successful, it was this new "sexual pleasure" brought by
the Watchers that resulted in the wholesale seduction and "corruption" of Hebrew
women, causing the rampant fornication that ensued thereafter — and perhaps
most noteworthy, was supposedly the major motivation behind God's reported
decision to destroy all Mankind in the Great Flood (Noah's Flood):
"The biblical tale of the Deluge, the Great Flood, begins in Chapter 6 of
Genesis with eight enigmatic verses. Their presumed purpose was to explain to
future generations how it was — how it could have happened — that the very
Creator of Humankind turned against it, vowing to wipe Man off the face of the
Earth? The fifth verse is supposed to offer both explanation and justification:
'And Yahweh saw that the wickedness of Man was great on the Earth, and that
every imagination of his heart's thoughts was evil.' Therefore (verse six)
'Yahweh repented that He had made Man upon the Earth, and it grieved Him at His
heart.'
"But this explanation by the Bible, pointing the accusing finger at humanity,
only increases the puzzle of the chapter's first four verses, whose subject is
not at all humanity but the deities themselves, and whose focus is the
intermarriage between "the sons of God" and "the daughters of the Adam.
"And if one wonders, what has all that got to do with the excuse for the Deluge as a punishment of Mankind, the answer can be given in one word: SEX... Not human sex, but Divine Sex." ["Divine Encounters"; Chapter 4, Zecharia Sitchin] (emphasis added)
While "Divine Sex" might be explained simply by the fact that these "angels" were considered divine, yet this does not explain why, in the Book of Enoch, not only these "angels" but also their children were accused of being "...addicted to (lust)" [(Book of Enoch, ch. 10, v. 18)] and, thus, condemned to be slaughtered... every last one!
But... is this merely a fanciful Canaanite legend of Angels marrying and having children with Human females and passing along to those children an "addict(ion) to (lust)" via a form of "Divine Sex" for which they were targeted for slaughter?
Or might there be actual, solid, historical evidence for exactly just such a "Dark Gift" of truly "insatiable" male sexual capacity?
"Divine Sex" vs. "human sex"
What then exactly constituted "Divine Sex"? And what about such "Divine Sex" would have been so unique, so separated from all forms of "human sex" already in practice by the many sexually motivated cultures in existence? And what about the sex possible between these demigods and females and the superior sensual pleasures taught to women thereby was considered so terribly corrupting as to be considered the motivation behind God's decision to destroy all Humankind via the Great Flood?
Setting aside any supernatural elements in logically investigating this intriguing question, what we do know about the "Fallen Angels" is that they were all male. Thus, whatever possible unique sexual characteristic(s) they might have possessed that resulted in such superior pleasures would have both originated and resulted from the male side of the heterosexual "equation."
Thus the question becomes: Is there any inherent male sexual limitation universal to homo sapiens males on this planet that might prevent females from learning and enjoying their full potentials for sexual pleasure?
The obvious answer to this question is a resounding "yes!":
"The one thing I hate is that no matter how you go about it, intercourse ends almost always when he comes and becomes limp..."
"I feel it is a great pity that males and females were sexually-biologically built such that males are ready to quit just as females are getting started."
"If the partner is male, the woman is stuck with the limits of his sexuality."
[female respondents in "The Hite Report" (1976, p. 325)]
This natural propensity in normal males to quickly rise to orgasm followed by a
mandatory, physiologically dictated, "down time," thereafter is called the "Male
Refractory Period." This is also what motivates men's stereotypical "wham, bam,
thank-you-ma'am" sexual response cycle and, all too often, their emotional
"love-'em-and-leave-'em" attitudes where romance is concerned. This is quite
obviously not at all compatible with either the female's own sexual response
cycle or her desires for romance and emotional intimacy.
Women have always possessed an orgasmic potential far superior to that of normal
men, regardless of race, society, or culture. All women are, at least,
physiologically capable of an almost infinite capacity for multiple orgasm;
whereas ordinary men most certainly are not. As a result of this, women are
forever kept from exploring, achieving, and enjoying their natural sexual
potentials while mated to mono-orgasmic males.
"Watcher" Males... Multiorgasmic?
However, were Azazel and other Watcher males not sexually hampered by a Male Refractory Period and were thus as naturally multiorgasmic as women then, with such male sexual equals, females would indeed experience an enjoyment of sexual pleasure previously impossible and unknown to them.
Add to this the intimacies and emotional pleasures of sharing this higher degree
of sensual fulfillment with a loving male partner of equal sexual capacity and
it becomes possible to understand why such never-ending emotional and sensual
communion would have been so much more appealing to women, who by nature are at
least as emotionally motivated as they are sensually. However, as relates
specifically to erotic pleasures, after a number of multiple orgasms, true
multiorgasmics experience a ever-increasing, opiate-like euphoria or "high"
resulting from the continual release of endorphins orgasm after orgasm.
Thus were the "Watchers" truly multiorgasmic, women would find in such unique
males both lovers and mates with whom their own emotional and sensual needs and
potentials would best be fulfilled.
A most provocative theory. But, is there any evidence to support such?
The Name "Azazel" and the Multiorgasmic Implications of its Etymology
Further intriguing evidence of Azazel's known sexual nature is found in the
origin of the particular name ascribed to this sensuous "Fallen Angel" by the
ancient Hebrews:
"This word is itself derived from SHD 5810 ‘azaz' which is a prime root meaning to be stout. Literally or figuratively it means to harden, be impudent, prevail or strengthen the self or to be strong."
[http://www.logon.org/english/s/p153.html]
As with the sexually slanted etymology of the prime root term most notably given
the Watcher offspring, Rephaim, ("vigor", meaning "lustihood, stamina, virility,
hard, potent, masculine, male"), so also do we find that the term "Azazel" also
contains specific apparent references to male "virility" and "hard"-ness.
To the hyper-"pious" sensibilities of the ancient Canaanites, who could argue
that there could be nothing more "impudent" (immodest, shameless) than the
"harden"-ed male sexual organ? And in the case of a "Fallen Angel" possessing
true multiorgasmic capacity and for whom a continually erect phallus ("strengthen[ing]
the self") while sexually aroused would notably be maintained regardless of the
number of fully ejaculatory multiple orgasms experienced, this pronounced and
highly unusual male sexual capacity would most certainly have strongly
influenced the name by which this particular Watcher would forever be
remembered.
Here then we find an intriguing possible explanation of how Azazel might have
taught women to "enjoy sexual pleasure" to a degree significantly greater than
that previously possible to heterosexual females.
Yet while such a theory most certainly explains the extremely libidinous
accounts of the "Fallen Angels" with human females, and how it was that Azazel
could stand accused of "teaching women to enjoy sexual pleasure" previously
unknown to them, and why the ancient Hebrews vilified these "Watcher" males for
having so "corrupted" their females, and why their version of "God" would have
been so reportedly motivated to destroy all humankind in the Great Deluge as a
result of such highly developed sensuality, what do the ancient texts, the
archeaological and anthropological studies into such ancient Middle Eastern
cultures reveal apart from religious interpretations as to who and what these
"Watchers" were?
And... is there any true evidence to support such a provocative theory?
Canaanite "Fallen Angels" = Sumerian "Anunnaki"
As has already been proven by science, the story of Noah's Flood in Genesis find its origins in a far more ancient account of this same flood in the Sumerian tale of the "Epic of Gilgamesh." And as concluded by many scholars and archaeologists specializing in ancient Sumer, the "Fallen Angels" of Genesis also find direct parallel and were indeed synonymous with the earlier accounts of the Sumerian "Anunnaki," who like the "Fallen Angels" were also a group of superior beings who descended to Earth and openly provided Humankind with key knowledge necessary to modern Human civilization, including agriculture, writing, the basic sciences and mathematics.
However, whereas the ancient Sumerians called these "heavenly" beings "Anunnaki", meaning "Those Who from Heaven to Earth Came", the Canaanites and their descendants the Israelites chose to instead vilify these same beings with the appellation, "Nefilim", which meant "Those Who from Heaven to Earth Fell." The implication apparent to all that, to the ancient Canaanites, these beings were not to be considered as benevolent beings from "Heaven," as they were so considered by the Sumerians, but instead as malevolent evil beings who had rebelled against God, been cast out of Heaven by Him, and thus had fallen to Earth, therefrom.
Further information on this subject can be found in the writings of Zecharia Sitchin, "Internationally acclaimed author and Biblical scholar," who continues to write books and articles on this topic. Chapter Four ("The Nephilim: Sex and Demigods") of his book "Divine Encounters," offers intriguing additional information on this subject:
"The biblical term Nefilim, the sons of the Elohim who were then upon the Earth, parallels the Sumerian Anunnaki ('Those Who from Heaven to Earth Came'); the Bible itself (Numbers 13:33) explains this by pointing out that the Nefilim were 'sons of Anak' (Hebrew rendering of Anunnaki). The time preceding the Deluge was thus a time when the young Anunnaki began to have sex with young human females; and being compatible, had children by them - offspring part mortal and part 'divine': demigods.
"That such demigods were present on Earth is amply attested in Near Eastern texts, be it in regard to individuals (such as the Sumerian Gilgamesh) or long dynasties (such as the reported dynasty of thirty demigods in Egypt that preceded the Pharaohs); both instances, however, pertain to post-Diluvial times. But in the biblical preamble to the Deluge tale we have an assertion that the "taking of wives" from among the human females by the 'sons of the Elohim' - sons of the DIN.GIR - had already begun well before the Deluge."
[http://timedwards.topcities.com/tec/divine/de4a.htm] (emphasis added)
Of additional evidence that the Sumerian "Anunnaki" were, in fact, the
precursors of the "Nefilim" ("Sons of God," "Fallen Angels," "Watchers") of
Genesis, Jubilees, the Books of Enoch, etc., is the fact that the very name "Sumer"
means, in the original Sumerian language, "Land of the Watchers." Hence from
ancient times on, and as the Sumerians identified themselves, Sumer was indeed
the Land of the "Watchers," the Land of the "Fallen Angels":
"SHIN'AR or SUMER = Land of the Watchers" [Sumerian Dictionary]
Polygyny: An "Anunnake" Birthright and Continuing Legacy?
Equally understandable is the concept that, for males capable of such insatiable
and unlimited sexuality, polygyny (that form of polygamy in which there is one
male and multiple females) might indeed be the logical marital preference. Thus,
it is reasonable to consider likely the idea that polygyny as a practice might
well have been introduced to Human society by such multiorgasmic "fallen
angels."
Currently, it is a fact that despite the dominance of monogamy as the societal
norm in Western culture, the fact remains that even today over 85% of all world
societies are polygynous. And the great majority of all such societies have as
their cultural example ancient Judaism and, more recently, Islam, both of whom
have as their earliest "prophet", father, and leader the figure of Father
Abraham, himself originally from "Ur of the Chaldees", which we identify today
as the ancient Sumerian city of Uruk, from whence Abraham brought with him the
practice of polygyny.
Thankfully with the growing acceptance of gay marriage, the legal issues re: the
continued criminality of polygyny and the blatant discrimination now apparent in
decriminalizing one marital option among consenting adults while continuing to
criminalize another far more ancient and natural one (over 95% of all mammals
are polygynous) is finally beginning to be noticed and legally addressed. After
all, if it's okay that "Heather Has Two Mommies", why should it then be illegal
if she have two mommies and a daddy?
Persecution in Palestine/Israel and Exodus to Sumer ("Land of the Watchers")
(ca 7,000 — 5,000 BCE)
Our search for more information regarding the descendents of the original 200
"Watcher" males is hampered by the fact that while the basic initial terrestrial
history of the Watchers and their progeny exists in almost every Near and Middle
Eastern historical record (e.g., the Old Testament, Talmud, the Book of
Jubilees, the Books of Enoch, the Dead Sea Scrolls), yet so little references
exist concerning their characteristics and the later history of their
descendents, the Rephaim. However one event is found in almost every surviving
historical document regarding the Rephaim that recounts an attempt made by the
ancient Canaanites to slaughter them all.
The motivation given for such wholesale slaughter is reported in the Book of
Enoch. Despite the fact that all accounts, including the Book of Enoch, clearly
record that the "Watchers" had lawfully married their wives and with them had
children, yet the Book of Enoch specifically calls the children of these
marriages "bastards" and "children of fornication":
"And to Gabriel said the Lord: 'Proceed against the bastards and the reprobates,
and against the children of fornication: and destroy [the children of
fornication and] the children of the Watchers from amongst men..."
"Destroy all the souls addicted to dalliance (lust*), and the offspring of the
Watchers..." [Book of Enoch, Chapter 10, vs 9, 18] * Knibb,
p. 90; cp. Charles, p. 76
Yet despite the Bible's references to the destruction of the Rephaim, later
Biblical references speak of their continued existence in Palestine (e.g.,
Numbers: 13:22; 13:28-33; Deut: 1:28; 2:1-; 9:2; Joshua: 11:21-22; 14:12; 14:15;
15:13-14; Judges: 1:20).
Thus the Watchers and their progeny, the Rephaim, were not completely
destroyed during this first genocidal attempt, though many were killed.
Instead the evidence strongly suggests that the majority of the surviving
Rephaim escaped and migrated to other more tolerant and almost infinitely more
sensual societies in the Fertile Crescent area, particularly the land of Sumer
(also rendered "Shu' Mer" and "Shin' Ar"), whose very name means "Land of the
Watchers".
Sumerian Anunnaki and their Descendants Multiorgasmic
Sumer ("Land of the 'Watchers'"), the first true empire and civilization in
recorded history (ca 5,000 — 2,000 BCE), was — according to its own mythology
— founded by and flourished under the reign of the "Anunnaki" (Those Who from
Heaven to Earth Came"), who were the Sumerian equivalent of the "Nefilim" (Those
Who from Heaven to Earth Fell"), also known as the "Watchers," whose progeny
were the Rephaim.
Perhaps more than any culture before or since, Sumer glorified and celebrated
eroticism and sexual activity. Public sexual expression, incest and pedophilia,
and sacred prostitution: all have their origins in Sumerian culture. Yet also
during the Sumerian period did women enjoy the most economic, social, and sexual
freedoms than they have ever since. With the Anunnaki, women were truly
considered equal in every way. This was due to the fact that both the Anunnaki
males and their descendants as well as the Human females with whom they shared
and enjoyed all, were equal sexually and emotionally. All were multiorgasmic.
Central to this research is the theory that the "Watchers" were multiorgasmic.
Thus, were the Anunnaki equivalent with the "Watchers" (Nefilim) of Canaanite
mythology, they too would also have been multiorgasmic. And sure enough, we soon
discovered irrefutable proof of this in perhaps the single most important public
ritual practiced annually by the Sumerians for over 2,000 years and was later
practiced in many derivative forms by Pagans worldwide.
"Hieros Gamos": Sumer's Annual Male Multiorgasmic King-making Ceremony...
When first the Watchers ("Fallen Angels") descended from the skies, approximately between 10,000 and 5,000 BCE, and offered Humankind their first lessons in the arts and sciences, they were honored with the appellation bene ha elohim (literally "Sons of God[s]" {Genesis 6:1-4}). First recorded in Sumer as the "Anunnake," these Watchers took to themselves wives "of all that they chose" with whom they shared fully the hyperorgasmic "Dark" Gift they alone possessed, awakening in Human females for the first time their full emotional and sensual potentials. Thus began the founding of the Sumerian Empire, still today the single greatest and most influential civilization ever to have existed on this planet.
Throughout its multi-millennial predominance, Sumer was ruled only by those male "Watcher" descendants in full possession of this multiorgasmic "Dark" Gift, which capacity was required to be annually demonstrated publicly during the original "Hieros Gamos" (Sacred Marriage) ceremony, an explicit multiorgasmic Sumerian King-making rite enacted for at least 2,000 years.
As stated above, the king's capacity for leadership was tested via the Hieros
Gamos (Sacred Marriage) ceremony wherein he sexually re-enacted with the
Priestess the role of Dumuzi, the demi-god ruler of Sumer. Without this
ceremony, "he was not considered fit to rule." Thus, his kingship
depended upon his ability to consummate "his marriage with the goddess" not once
or twice... but "fifty times." That's right: 50 orgasms, one after the other,
non-stop.
By this requirement, all Sumerian Kings had to be...
multiorgasmic. "...The high priestess, acting in place of The Goddess (Inanna),
had sex with the new king to show the Goddess's people that the Goddess herself
accepted him as their caretaker and ruler of the country. Not only did these two
have sex fifty times, but the entire congregation had front row seats to
these fifty climaxes...."
[http://people.stu.ca/~gwvpt/theme4.htm] (emphasis added)
And while the above-cited quote has it appear that 50 orgasms were required of
each, the ancient texts themselves limit this 50-orgasm requirement to the man,
alone. Only the King-apparent, in the role of the God Dumuzi, was required to
climax 50 times.
Ruled by a male King yet he, in turn, ruled over by the Anunnaki and... in particular... the Goddess Inanna, Sumer annually re-enacted the following King-making Hieros Gamos (Sacred Marriage) rite with the King in the role of the Demi-God "Dumuzi" and the Priestess in the role of the Goddess, herself:
Inanna spoke:
"My beloved, the delight of my eyes, met me.
We rejoiced together.He took his pleasure of me.
He brought me into his house.
He laid me down on the fragrant honey-bed.
My sweet love, lying by my heart,
Tongue-playing,one by one,
My fair Dumuzi did so fifty times.
Now, my sweet love (i.e., Dumuzi) is sated."
[excerpt from "The Courtship of Inanna and Dumuzi," ca 3000 BCE] (emphasis added)
This multiorgasmic interpretation is further validated in the book "Inanna: Queen of Heaven and Earth" (1983, Wolkstein & Kramer) where this passage is indeed understood as Dumuzi "...making love to her 'fifty times'" (p. 153).
Only after fifty such orgasms is Dumuzi, her male lover (twice described by
Inanna as "my sweet love" in the above-excerpted passage), sexually "sated."
Should any doubt still remain as to the correct interpretation of this "fifty times" passage, another version of this same event was recorded anciently and can be found online at Oxford University's "Electronic Corpus of Sumerian Literature":
"When my sweet precious (Inanna), my heart, had lain down too,
Each of them in turn kissing with the tongue, each in turn,
Then my brother (Dumuzi) of the beautiful eyes did it fifty times to her,
Exhaustedly waiting for her, as she trembled underneath him, dumbly silent for him.
My dear precious passed the time with my brother laying his hands on her hips."
[excerpt from "A Balbale of Inana and Dumuzid," t.4.08.04, 12-18] (emphasis added)
Only after the King or the heir-apparent to the Sumerian throne had fully exhibited his possession of this most sensual (and truly "vampiric) "Dark" Gift by so sexually "feasting" (vampir' = "he who feasts") with a lovely, young female priestess representing the goddess Inanna, "...making love to her 'fifty times'", "...one by one" (i.e., one orgasm after another non-stop), was his Anunnake (i.e., Vampire) bloodline indisputably verified, his sensual/emotional equality with females proven, and he declared by her thus fit to reign as king over both males and females. As a result, never before nor since has an empire existed with more equal rights, honor, and dignity paid to the female gender and to sexuality's true potentials.
This, then, is the true explanation why the Slavic Vampire was originally best identified and historically most characterized by his superhumanly "insatiable" sexual capacity.
And then we have the personal account of Enmerkar, King of Uruk, relating his
personal experience in the "Sacred Marriage" Rite of Kingship with an "entu" or
"hierodule" (the female priestess representing Inanna in "Sacred Marriage" rite)
(ca 2600 BCE). Responding to a boast by the governor of a neighboring city
claiming to be the true "beloved" of Inanna, and thus attempting to make himself
a potential rival to Uruk's throne, Enmerkar replies:
"He may lie with her in sweet slumber on the adorned bed, but I lie on Inana's
splendid bed strewn with pure plants. Its back is an ug lion, its front is a
pirig lion. The ug lion chases the pirig lion, the pirig lion chases the
ug
lion. As the ug lion chases the pirig lion and the pirig lion chases the
ug
lion, the day does not dawn, the night does not pass. I accompany Inana for a
journey of (15) double-hours*..." (Lines 77-88)
["Enmerkar and Ensuhkesdanna: A Sumerian Narrative Poem", Berlin, p. 45]
(emphasis added)
* In personal commnication, the author, Dr. Adele Berlin, explained that the
Sumerian "double-hour" refers to the distance that could be traveled in two
hours. To our reply email asking her opinion of the theory that this might refer
to a non-stop sexual "journey" of 30 hours, Dr. Berlin replied "You have
understood the passage well. The idea is of a never-ending night of lovemaking
with the goddess, which proves who is the superior king." Thus, apparently
Enmerkar chose to use this common term for distance to more literally and
figuratively illustrate the sexual "journey" taken by both he and Inanna [i.e.,
her priestess], with whom he orgasmically "accompany"-ied for 30 hours.
In "accompany"-ing Inanna in bed on a 30-hour ("15 double-hours") sexual
"journey" during the "Sacred Marriage" king-making rite rather than to instead
"lie with her in sweet slumber", Enmerkar indisputably lays hold to the superior
sexual claim to Inanna's favor, and thus Uruk's throne. Enmerkar further
illustrates the eternal nature of their lovemaking by using as metaphor the two
lion decorations inlaid into the Sacred Marriage bed, itself, likewise eternally
"chasing" each other about the bed's base.
Unlike his lesser rival, Enmerkar had proved himself worthy of kingship in
proving himself capable of fully "accompany"-ing the sexually insatiable Inanna:
"Inanna's powers are prodigious. She is capable of making love through the day
and night... The marriage of the goddess Inanna to the king was of essential
importance to the people of Sumer. It was by this religious ritual that Inanna,
Queen of Heaven, would take the earth-king into the "sweetness of her holy
loins," and by her cosmic powers ensure the king's powers of leadership and
fertiliity.
"Yet Inanna, the Goddess of Love, does not offer her favors freely. Not only must
she be properly approached with sweet words and gifts, but she must be properly
and amply loved. A lion of a man is demanded: a king who is equal to Inanna..."
["Inanna: Queen of Heaven and Earth", 1983, Wolkstein & Kramer; p. 155]
(emphasis added)
Once the King met with Inanna's (the Priestess') sexual approval by proving his
multiorgasmic capacity, thus evidencing his possession of this unique Rephaim
(Anunnaki) trait, then were the following words spoken signifying her acceptance
of him as a "fit" and "worthy" King:
"You, the chosen shepherd of the holy shrine,
You, the king, the faithful provider of Uruk,
You, the light of An's great shrine,
In all ways you are fit:
To hold your head high on the lofty dais,
To sit on the lapis lazuli throne,
To cover your head with the holy crown...
To bind yourself with the garments of kingship,...
In all ways you are fit.
May your heart enjoy long days...
You are the favorite of Ningal. Inanna holds you dear."
"The Sacred Marriage likely originated in the Sumerian city of Uruk (which was
dedicated to the Goddess Inanna) earlier than 3000 B.C. The Sacred Marriage was
between the Goddess Inanna and either the high priest (representing the god), or
the king (representing the God Dumuzi), and was performed in the temples of
various fertility goddesses for nearly two thousand years. The annual symbolic
reenactment of this mythical union was a public celebration essential to the
well-being of the community, and since it was the occasion of a joyous
celebration, it may have involved sexual activity on the part of the worshipers
in and around the temple grounds (Lerner 240). The fact that the king of Sumer
ritually married a representative of the goddess Inanna once every year helped
sustain the power of the priestesses at least for a time (Stephenson 56). Rites
similar to the Sacred Marriage also flourished in classical Greece and
pre-Christian Rome (Lerner 240)."
[Women in Mesopotamia] (emphasis added)
"This yearly rite, which begins with sacrifices and culminates in this sacred
marriage or "hieros gamos", is delicately and sketchily described by Geoffrey
Parrinder ["World Religions from Ancient History to the Present," (Facts on File
Publications, New York, 1983), pp. 125-128] who observes that the king acted as
the successor to Dumuzi, lover and husband of Inanna. In re-enacting the
love-feast of these two deities that assured fertility: "The part of the goddess
was given to a selected priestess." Parrinder notes that entry to the higher
classes of priesthood was by patronage, so that society's physically and
intellectually favored were selected. A highly readable account of the sacred
marriage of Inanna and Dumuzi, giving full and glowing details of their
lovemaking and subsequent exchange of gifts has recently been published. This
work describes the results of the sacred union in terms of establishing the
authority and throne of the king, granting him a favorable and glorious
reign and an enduring crown, fertile fields, sheep, vegetation, grain, birds,
and produce in abundance." [Wolkstein, Diane, and Samuel N. Kramer, "Inanna: Queen of
Heaven and Earth, Her Stories and Hymns from Sumer" (Harper & Row, N.Y., 1983),
pp. 146-147]
"Evidence from a Sumerian seal, described by Iris Furlong in "The Mythology of
the Ancient Near East" in The Feminist Companion to Mythology, edited by
Carolyne Larrington, shows sacred marriage rites may have been performed in
Sumer before the middle of the third millennium B.C. — more than 4500 years...
This feast of collective pleasure involved the whole populace and lasted many
days, according to A.T. Mann and Jane Lyle in (their book) "Sacred Sexuality."
Everything in the rite was designed to stir the senses; men and women anointed
themselves with essences, paints and jewelry, toasted the goddess and her
bridegroom with wine and danced serpentine dances to lyre, flute and drum.
Hierophants and priestesses performed libations and sacrifices and burned as
incense cinnamon, aloes and myrrh. At the ritual's peak, the king approached the
temple with offerings of oil, precious spices and delectable foods to tempt the
goddess. He mounted the goddess at the temple summit as the crowd chanted
poetry. The ritual was performed as an allegorical masque, according to Furlong,
including speaking parts and probably music; the king played the part of the god Dumuzi ("faithful son"), and a priestess of the highest rank played the goddess
Inanna or Ishtar in a ritualized enactment of the divine coupling. The poetry of
the ritual ("The Courtship of Inanna and Dumuzi"), translated from the
Sumerian Gudea Cylinders, circa 3000 B.C., reflects an attitude toward sex, and sexual
spirituality, much different than that prevailing in Western culture today.
"The sacred marriage as a rite acted on many levels. On a physical level, it
renewed fertility. The Sumerians, according to Furlong, considered their ruler
responsible for agricultural prosperity, and all sexual reproduction on earth,
vegetable, animal and human, depended on his intercourse with the goddess. The
sacred marriage also legitimized the king's power; without it, Mann and Lyle
write, he was not considered fit to rule. His leadership ability was directly
linked to his consummating his marriage with the goddess."
[http://www.crystalforest1.homestead.com/whoreheartofgold.html]
(emphasis added)
"Sacred Marriage" Multiorgasmic Rite Used to Select Sexually-Equal Kings
"The Consecration of the Sacred King — after the close complicity of the night
spent with Dumuzi (the Sacred Marriage Ceremony), Inanna decrees the fate of her
chosen consort and priest-king, because "in all ways" She found him " fit" and
"Inanna holds you dear". It must be pointed out that in South Mesopotamia, after
kingship descended from the heavens to Eridu, it is Inanna and Enlil who descend
to Earth to choose and crown the king, as described in the myth of Etana. It is
Inanna (or her earthly representative, the High Priestess of Uruk/the land)
again in the Courtship that decrees the fate of the king/Dumuzi. This is a very
strong evidence that at least the High Priestess was equal in status to the
king, once he had to be first accepted by her to rule the land as her consort.
[http://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/gods/ladies/ladyinanna2.html]
(emphasis added)
"There are "hints that Ishtar was in some way responsible for the selection and
sanctioning of the kings of the Sumerian city-states, who acted as stewards of
the divine sovereigns. It was this way...which gave rise to the concept of
sacred marriage, the 'temple prostitution' that the later Bible writers would
find so abominable. The sacred marriage was a formal, highly stylized cultic
institution, at one and the same time religious and political, enacted between
the high priestess representing Ishtar, and the king in the role of high priest
representing the city as the vicar of god; and though this act of sacred
sexuality, the power of the divinity flowed down from heaven through the king to
the people and the land." [Magnus Magnusson, BC — The Archaeology of the Bible Lands]
"...A text does exist describing the coronation of a Sumerian king during the
Uruk period (late fourth millennium). According to this text, the king-to-be
approached the throne dais of the goddess Inanna-Ishtar. There he received from
her the 'bright scepter' and the 'golden crown'. He probably also received from
her a new, royal name." [An Encyclopedia of Archetypal Symbolism]
Sumer's First Gods and Kings (The Anunnaki) Were Multiorgasmic
Thus it can only be concluded that the entire Sumerian "Sacred Marriage" Rite
was established as a necessary means of ensuring that all of Sumer's kings
possessed the invaluable male sexual capacity of being wholly and truly
multiorgasmic. The public display of this male multiorgasmic trait validated
their original "divine" Anunnaki bloodline before all the people, thus
legitimizing their right to rule. And thus, this trait came direct from the
original Anunnaki, the Canaanite "Nefilim," the "Watchers" who descended "from
Heaven" anciently to teach women "sexual pleasure" previously unknown to them.
As their kingly descendants, these "demi-god" Sumerian kings were required to
prove themselves multiorgasmic prior to being permitted to acquire and/or retain
the throne. Thus, given this fact, their forefathers, the Anunnaki, must have
likewise possessed this same required "kingly" sexual trait.
The necessity of ensuring these kings as being of the divine Anunnaki birthright
and bloodline is explained here:
"To be a bridge to the gods, the king had to be superior in his very essence to
ordinary people. The early kings were crucial to the development and survival of
Sumerian civilization... Kingship was so important in Sumerian times that the
Sumerian King List records "that kingship came down from heaven". Crucial as
they were to state formation, these earliest kings had to find a way to
legitimate their power. As they had the weight of historical precedence to
buttress their idea of rule, no dynastic principle to assure the rights of a
successor, they had to demonstrate that they were greater than the rest of the
populace." [http://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/gods/ladies/ladyinanna2.html]
Given that the "Sacred Marriage" ceremony so explicitly served as the Final Test
whereby a prospective heir-apparent to the throne proved his right to King-ship,
the importance of his ability to perform "fifty times" with the Priestess must
have been of incalculable importance to the Sumerians.
As only truly multiorgasmic males could perform sexually as required by this sex
ritual, thereby "...demonstrat(ing) that they were greater than the rest of the
populace" and thus showing themselves "superior in (their) very essence to
ordinary people," the only reasonable conclusion to be drawn is that the
original "Anunnaki" Gods and Kings of Sumer were multiorgasmic, as also were
their more earthly descendants and rightful heirs to the Sumerian throne. This
then necessitated that an ritual be prepared that permitted the populace to
ensure that their King did indeed descend from the Anunnaki bloodline and, thus,
was worthy and "fit" to be their King.
Gilgamesh and Enkidu also Multiorgasmic?
In the later Sumerian/Babylonian myth of "Epic of Gilgamesh" ("He Who Saw
Everything", Part I), Gilgamesh is described as a demi-god King ("'I am king
indeed?' His name was called Gilgamesh From the very day of his birth, He was
two-thirds god, one third man..."), a giant also ("Eleven cubits high he is,
nine spans his chest"), and one stronger than all other males and also
possessing an insatiable sexuality:
"All young girls made women by Gilgamesh His lusts are such, and no virgin left
to her lover! Not the daughter of a warrior, Nor the wife of a nobleman! Yet he
is king and should be. The people's careful shepherd... He is wise, he is
handsome, he is firm as a rock... No virgin left to her lover, For he lusts
strongly!"
In the legend, the people complain to the Gods about Gilgamesh and so an equal
to Gilgamesh is formed and called "Enkidu." This new male being is at first
tempted into submission via a hierodule (sacred maiden), a "child of pleasure,"
of the Temple of Inanna/Ishtar. This young woman sex priestess then seduces
Enkidu and his multiorgasmic session with her is described:
"She had no shame for this, Made herself naked Welcomed his eagerness Incited
him to love, Taught the woman's art. Six days, seven nights, That time lying
together, Enkidu had forgotten his home Had forgotten the hills. After that time
he was satisfied... For six days and seven nights Enkidu made love to that
girl."
Again, only after lovemaking for almost an entire week is this particular male
satisfied. And while myths do tend to over-exaggerate the acts of gods and
demigods, yet where Sumerian and Babylonian myths regarding sexual capacity are
concerned, it must be remembered that the "Sacred Marriage" ceremony requiring
the King to orgasm "fifty times" was not myth or legend, but was a very real and
oft-documented ceremony for over 2,000 years in Sumer, Thus, such "superhuman"
male sexual capacity was indeed very real in that time and place and did not
need to be embellished.
Sumer's Multiorgasmic Legacy Fades into History
... and Women's Equality Fades Away with Them
Only after the Anunnaki and their descendants faded from power in Sumer, for
as-yet-unknown reasons, did the subsequent kingdoms of Babylonia and later,
Assyria, begin to dominate females and deprive them of their former prestige and
position while moving swiftly to control and repress female sexualtiy, whose
multiorgasmic nature had for so many millennia been championed and equally
enjoyed by the Rephaim but which now fell under the domination of sexually
intimidated, mono-orgasmic males:
"The history of women in Mesopotamia is a long and complex one. Part of this is
due to the fact that there are many divisions in the history of Mesopotamia
itself. History begins in Mesopotamia with civilizations there rising and
falling and shifting. Along with these shifting civilizations came shifting
views about women, particularly their status and freedoms. This essay will cover
the status of women during the different civilizations of Mesopotamia: Sumeria,
Babylonia, Assyria, and Judea. Of special interest, however, is the Assyrian
period, which lasted from 900 BC.-600BC. During this period, an extremely
important law, entitled the Middle Assyrian Law 40, was written that still
affects women of this region today. With MAL 40, the state assumed control of
female sexuality by forcing certain women to wear veils, and restricting other
women from wearing them. With each successive civilization, women enjoyed less
freedom and a lower status, and a patriarchal revolution slowly took place..."
"The first ancient Mesopotamian civilization was that of Sumeria... During this
period, a woman's strongest position was in relation to the temples. Often
young
girls worked in the temples as housekeepers or as concubines to the earthly
representatives of the gods (Stephenson 56). Fathers were proud to have their
daughters serving religion in this way. They would mark their daughters' entry
into temple life with a ceremonial sacrifice and bestow the girls' marriage
dowries to the temple (Stephenson 56). Nin-dingir priestesses annually
participated in the Sacred Marriage by impersonating or representing the goddess
Inanna (Lerner 239). The Sacred Marriage likely originated in the Sumerian city
of Uruk (which was dedicated to the Goddess Inanna) earlier than 3000 B.C. The
basis for the ritual of the Sacred Marriage was the belief that fertility of the
land and of people depended on the celebration of the sexual power of the
fertility goddess (Lerner 239). The Sacred Marriage was between the Goddess Inanna and either the high priest (representing the god), or the king
(representing the God Dumuzi), and was performed in the temples of various
fertility goddesses for nearly two thousand years. The annual symbolic
reenactment of this mythical union was a public celebration essential to the
well-being of the community, and since it was the occasion of a joyous
celebration, it may have involved sexual activity on the part of the worshipers
in and around the temple grounds (Lerner 240). The fact that the king of Sumer
ritually married a representative of the goddess Inanna once every year helped
sustain the power of the priestesses at least for a time (Stephenson 56). Rites
similar to the Sacred Marriage also flourished in classical Greece and
pre-Christian Rome (Lerner 240).
"In about 1750 B.C. the Sumerians, who had been the creative force in developing
Western civilization, were overcome by neighboring Semitic people, the
Babylonians, whose greatest king gave his famous Code of Hammurabi to history
(Stephenson 57). Historians have learned much about the Babylonian male/female
relationship, and the status of women, from the Code of Hammurabi. Under these
laws, a woman could be divorced on virtually any grounds: childlessness,
adultery, and even poor household management. For example, one of the rules
states, "If she have not been a careful mistress, have gadded about, have
neglected her house, and have belittled her husband or children , they shall
throw that woman into the water." All the husband need do to obtain a divorce
was say, "Thou art not my wife," and return her dowry (Walsh 24). However, a
wife who used these words against her husband would be drowned. A woman could
not divorce her husband, but she could leave him if she could prove that her
husband had been cruel and that she had been faithful, and then simply return to
her parents' home with her dowry. A wronged husband was free to kill his wife
and her lover (Walsh 24)." [Women in Mesopotamia] (emphasis added)
Jessica Bieda, Univ. of Az., Women's Studies Dept.
In foreboding foreshadowing of future vilification during the 15th-16th
Centuries for their "insatiable" "carnal lust," the Babylonians began to
actively persecute women as "witches":
"By the time of the Code of Hammurabi, formulated between 1792 and 1750 BC, the
position of women had obviously been greatly eroded. The crimes recorded on the
tablets which now outnumbered all others were those of witchcraft and female
adultery. According to the Code the accused woman was subjected to the ordeal of
the river. If she survived being thrown into a river, she was absolved from any
crime. Were she to drown, however, this was considered to be proof of her guilt.
This way of ascertaining her guilt or otherwise had a continuing influence for
hundreds of years. In Europe, women accused of witchcraft were subjected to
similar ordeals by water up until medieval times." ["The Mythology of Sex", Dening, Ch. 3]
It is thus apparent that by the time of the Babylonian Period, the Rephaim were
clearly no longer an influence in the area. Where the Sumerian Rephaim might
have emmigrated during the advent of the Babylonian Empire is not known.
However, approximately 1,500 years earlier, after first establishing the
Sumerian Empire, other Rephaim were actively establishing the longest-lived
empire in World history: Egypt.
From Sumer to Egypt (ca 3,500 - 3,300 BCE)
"There is archaeological evidence of a strong cultural connection between Sumer and ancient Egypt. 'Ptah' and the other gods were called, in Egyptian, Ntr = 'Guardian, Watcher'.
"They (ie.'The Watchers') had come to Egypt, the Egyptians wrote, from Ta-Ur, the 'Far/Foreign Land,' whose name Ur meant 'oldest' but could have also been the actual place name - a place well known from Mesopotamian and biblical records: the ancient city of Ur in southern Mesopotamia. And the straits of the Red Sea, which connected Mesopotamia and Egypt, were called Ta-Neter, the 'Place of the Gods ('Watchers'),' the passage by which they had come to Egypt. That the earliest gods did come from the biblical lands of Shem is additionally borne out by the puzzling fact that the names of these olden fashioned things by carving and opening up' in the Semitic tongues."
[Zecharia Sitchin, The Wars of Gods and Men] (emphasis added)
"It was, in fact, the biblical Land of Shin'ar. It was the land whose name - Shumer - literally meant the Land of the Watchers. It was indeed the Egyptian Ta Neter - Land of the Watchers, the land from which the gods had come to Egypt."
[Zecharia Sitchin, Stairway to Heaven]
The "Watchers" in Egypt
If, as the Egyptians believed, Sumer (present-day Iraq) was indeed the Ta Neter (Land of the Gods) from which Land the Gods ("Watchers") had come to Egypt, what evidence is there in Egypt that would help either prove or disprove the Sumerian/Fallen Angel Connection, and further, what evidence is there that such "Watchers" in Egypt possessed some superhuman sexual capacity?
While the Hebrews believed the Watchers and their progeny, in particular, were blood-thirsty "giants" bent on the destruction and corruption of Humankind, yet if such evil, malignant, giant superbeings actually did make their way into Egypt, surely such a dreadful arrival would have figured prominently in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics and historical texts, as well. If the Watchers were the massive cannibalistic monsters as depicted and vilified in Genesis, the Books of Enoch, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Book of Jubilees, etc., they would have posed an horrific threat to the Egyptians as these supposedly murderous half-humans/half-demons invaded their lands. And yet nothing of any such "invasion" by any such foreigners from the East appears anywhere in Egyptian history of this period. No accounts exist at all of cannabilistic giants devouring whole villages, etc, as exists in Hebrew records. In fact, no successful invasion into Egypt occurred at all until the Greeks' conquest of Egypt under Alexander, thousands of years later.
Yet as seen in the previous quotes, there can be no doubt that the Egyptians recorded the arrival of "the Watchers" in Egypt from the Mesopotamian area of Sumer (Shu'mer) approximately 3500 BCE.
So, as Egypt's "Gods" came from Sumer anciently, who were the "Watchers" in Egypt... really?
The key to their discovery lies not in looking for "giants" or "cannibals" or even "demons" (all Hebrew lies), but in first searching for an Egyptian "Watcher" (God) or group of "Watchers" leaving some mark on Egyptian history in exemplifying the single indisputable defining characteristic of the Watchers: their superhuman sexual capacity.
Of course, it's not enough to simply find a male sex god or gods and assume that such must be of the "Watchers." No... if such a "Watcher" existed, he would have to fill additional requirements. After all, we have historical records that document the history and origins of these "Watchers," and while many of the specific vilifications and condemnations of the "Watchers" can be taken with a rather large grain of salt, yet there are basic characteristics and historical evidences revealed that can be useful in establishing a fairly reliable, relatively credible base of general "Watcher" characteristics, and any Egyptian "Watcher" candidate(s) would have to match these same criteria.
Specifically, in addition to exemplifying the epitome of the male sexual ideal ("super" "virility"), any such "Watcher":
1. Would have been documented as being a real man/being, not simply a "God"
based on a myth, legend, or superstition, etc.;
2. Would not have been native to Egypt, but would have specifically arrived in
Egypt from either Canaan/Palestine or - preferably - Sumer (whose very name in
Sumerian and Egyptian means "Land of the Watchers," further evidence of the
obvious ancient contact existing between them); and
3. Would have had to arrive in a timeframe following the Watchers' expulsion from
Canaan/Palestine, ca 4,000 BCE.
While almost no "deity" could arguably hope to pass even the first of these criteria, yet there is one Egyptian "deity" that does... and further succeeds in passing all three, historically and convincingly, and whose very name, like "Rephaim," specifically refers to never-ending "virility" of an eternal sexually "firm" nature.
The Watcher deity in question was by far the most "virile" of all the ancient Sex Gods. And according to many Egyptologists, he also happened to be Egypt's first Pharoah, King Menes.
The Egyptian Sex God, "Min" No Myth
By far the most sexual and "potent" of all Egypt's gods and arguably the most blatantly sexual of all the Ancient World's pantheon of fertility gods was the profoundly ithyphallic (with erect penis) sexual deity, "Min" (also known as Amsu, Menu, and Khem), whose well-hung likeness has been found in artifacts dating at least as far back as 3,000 B.C.E. (B.C.). While to Western minds, the deification of such an overtly sexual being might seem shocking, yet millennia before the Christian Era, sexuality itself was worshipped. Gods and goddesses of sexual capacity were symbolically and erotically venerated, and sexual expression, itself, was viewed as the greatest of human oblations and sacraments to the Divine.
"Min, Bull of the Great Phallus, ...
"You are the Great Male, the owner of all females.
The Bull who is united with those of the sweet love,
of beautiful face and of painted eyes, Victorious
sovereign among the Gods who inspires fear in the Ennead. ...
"The goddesses are glad, seeing your perfection."
[Hymn to Min]
King Menes and Min, One and the Same
Min (Menu or Minu, in Egyptian), unlike later sex gods, was not regarded primarily as some metaphorical fertility god, but was worshipped as the actual "bestower of sexual powers" to men, and never-ending "virility" and "orgiastic festivals" were annually held in his honor. Min was also considered another form of the God Horus (Horu or Heru), the "Avenger" of his father Osiris, and, later still, as a further representation of Amen, Amon, or Amun, the Chief God of the Ancient Egyptians after the XIIth Dynasty.
Amen
is Menu (Min)
Ironically, while Min preceded Amen by at least several hundred years and was later amalgamated into Amen, yet recent discoveries have verified that Amen is, himself, descended from Min:
"Min was the prototype of Amon".
[M. Eliade, Patterns in comparative religion, 1958: 91]
"Amen was scarcely distinguishable from Min, probably a dialectical variation of the same name."
[R. Briffault, The mothers; a study of the origins of sentiments and institutions, I-III, 1927: II 765f.]
However, perhaps most notably, according to an ever-increasing body of archaeological evidence as well as the writings of such relative Egyptian contemporaries as Manetho, Herodotus, and Ptolemy, this primieval sex god was not the creation of some primitive Egyptian superstition; Min was instead a mortal man and Egypt's first Pharoah: King Menes, himself.
"Min": The Only Major* Egyptian Deity who was an actual Mortal Man
King Menes, (Meni or Mene, in Egyptian) probably also known by the name Narmer as well as The Scorpion King, was the first true Pharoah of Egypt and the first to unite both Upper and Lower Egypt. More intriguing, he is said to have been a descendent of the "Demigods of Manes" (also known as the Shemsu Heru or Shemsu Hor [Family or Followers of Horus]), half-god, half-human hybrid immigrants to Egypt created from the union of over-libidinous gods and the human females they attracted and seduced.
Additionally, King Menes (The Scorpion King), was not himself native to Egypt, but reportedly arrived in Egypt around 3500 B.C.E. from Sumer, bringing with him the Sumerian writing language from which Egyptian hieroglyphic writing appears to have been later derived
[http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterFour/KingScorpion.htm]:
"Egyptologists agree that Menes must have entered Upper Egypt by the Red Sea, to the east of Koptos (Coptos) and Abydos. At Koptos exists the oldest known statues of a god in Egypt (three gigantic limestone figures of Min)... Min would appear to be the deified Menes..."
[http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterFour/NarmersPaletteObverse.htm] (emphasis added)
"Men, Menes, Min: First pharaoh of the united kingdom according to Herodotus, identified as Hor-aha"
[http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/glossary.htm#menes] (emphasis added)
"Little is known of Menes and his descendants outside of their divine ancestry and that they developed a complex social system (in Egypt), patronized the arts and constructed temples and many public buildings. The foundation of Memphis, the world's first imperial city, is attributed to Menes."
[http://www.arab.net/egypt/history/et_earlydynasty.html] (emphasis added)
* After their deaths, Imhotep, builder of the first stepped pyramid and renowned healer, was elevated to "demigod" status for thousands of years before ultimately being deified, and Amenhotep, another architect, was honorarily given "titular god" status over the Theban Necropolis after his death. However, Menes (Min) was regarded as a full deity in the Egyptian "A"-list pantheon from the earliest predynastic times. He was, in fact, the first Egyptian god.
"Menes" to "Min" - Common Word Etymology
Menes in Egyptian = "Mene" or "Meni"
Min in Egyptian = "Menu or "Minu"
Menes (Mene / Menu / Minu) Min
Scorpion King Depicted with Erect Penis
in Ancient Egyptian Inscription
Sometime between 1996-97 a key discovery was made on an escarpment 20 miles northwest of Luxor: a rock inscription dating back to 3250 BCE. Here the Scorpion Tableau (Gebel Tjauty tableau) graphically displays the heroic figure of the Scorpion King as deliberately ithyphallic (see graphic at right), the same as the uniquely* ithyphallic Egyptian god Min. Additionally, posture of the figure and placement of arms are further reminiscent of Min.
*Min is the only Egyptian god depicted as inherently ithyphallic. All other such representations of Egyptian deities either report on a specific incident in which the erect phallus plays a role (e.g., Osiris mating with Isis) or else represent other gods depicted as Min or identifying with Min metaphorically via this key sexual attribute (e.g., depictions of Amen as ithhyphallic).
The Ancient Greek Historian, Herodotus, Equates Menes with Min
"When this Min, who first became king, had made into dry land the part which was dammed off, on the one hand, I say, he founded in it that city which is now called Memphis..."
[Herodotus Histories II, Para 39,The Harvard Classics] (emphasis added)
"They said also that the first man who became king of Egypt was Min; and that in his time all Egypt except the district of Thebes was a swamp..."
[Herodotus Histories II, Para. 3 The Harvard Classics] (emphasis added)
Note: Also at this last URL, reference is made of the goat god from which the Greeks derived their own libidinous satyr god, "Pan." However to the Egyptians, this goat god was known by another name: Mendes. Taking the "d" away gives us "Menes". As stated earlier, "Pan" is derived directly from the god Min. Thus, here again what appears yet another direct connection between King Menes, Pan, and Min.
Menes Venerates "Hephaistos" (God of the "Forge")
According to Herodotus, after building the city of Memphis, "Min...established in the city the temple of Hephaistos, a great work and most worthy of mention."
[Herodotus Histories II, Para 39,The Harvard Classics] (emphasis added)
Herodotus, being Greek, attributed Min's temple as being that of "Hephaistos," the Greek equivalent of a much more ancient Egyptian god.
And who was Hephaistos?
Hephaistos, God of the Forge, is the personification of subterranean and terrestrial fire, including human lustiness. The instinctive, libidinous "fire down below" is echoed by the Tarot attribution of the spermatazoic letter Yod, which means "hand" but represents the 'point' of the phallus, particularly the sperm which projects from it. It represents the longing for soul completion, or union through the sexual act.
"Whether Zeus fathered Hephaistos or not, he rejected him forthwith. In one version, Hera abandoned him also, hurling her lame son into the sea from Olympian heights. This rejection and abandonment led him to judge himself as "imperfect" and his compensation was to achieve technological perfection through his work. Hephaistos was born with a birth defect; he was lame and twisted, and only learned to walk with great difficulty. His appearance disgusted Hera,
and she tried to hide him from the Immortals. He was raised by sea nymphs until
the age of nine, when he made his existence known to the Olympians." -[http://zero-point.tripod.com/pantheon/Hephaistos.html]
Might Min/Menes have also thought himself considered an outcast and rejected by society prior to his conquests and triumphs, or perhaps even afterwards and in spite of them?
Intriguing questions given Min's personal choice of a god to venerate. And perhaps intriguing insights into the inner character of this ancient legendary ruler and, in particular, his identity as one of the Rephaim progeny and in full possession of the genetic superhuman sexual characteristic of that legacy.
Hephaistos (Greek) = Ptah (Egyptian)
In Sumerian/Semitic, Ptah means:
"he who fashioned things by carving and opening up"
As stated above, Herodotus was Greek, and so used the Greek name for the Egyptian God, Ptah, upon which Hephaistos was derived centuries later.
The Memphis theology is based around Ptah (equivalent to the Greek Hephaistos, the divine blacksmith)...who himself becomes the primordial fire and gives it substance.[http://www.kheper.net/topics/Egypt/Memphis.html
]
While this is fairly common knowledge to mythology, what is not so commonly known is that the Egyptian god Ptah was, himself, derived upon an even earlier personage from yet another foreign land:
"That the earliest gods did come from the biblical lands of Shem is additionally borne out by the puzzling fact that the names of these olden gods were of 'Semitic' (Akkadian) derivation. Thus Ptah, which had no meaning in Egyptian, meant 'he who fashioned things by carving and opening up' in the Semitic tongues."
[Zecharia Sitchin, The Wars of Gods and Men] (http://echoes.devin.com/watchers/sons-of-god.html) (emphasis added)
Perhaps not coincidentally, the very forging and manufacturing skills for which Ptah and Hephaistos were known mirror almost exactly the trade skills reported to have been taught to humans by Azazel.
Azazel as Ptah --"God of the Forge"
Prior to Menes' temple to Ptah, no previous reference to Ptah exists. Thus it is probable that Ptah was created by Menes, himself. If true, then the concept of Ptah must have derived from Menes' own Sumerian origins. If indeed Menes were descended from the "Watchers," it would stand to reason that he would attempt to preserve their veneration in his newly established empire. And in venerating Ptah, the "Divine Blacksmith," we again cannot help but find direct parallel with one of the particular Chief Captains of the "Watchers," Azazel.
It was Azazel who, in addition to sexually "corrupting" females, also taught humankind metallurgy, the same characteristics possessed by Ptah, the "Divine Blacksmith":
"And Azazel taught men to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, the fabrication of mirrors and the workmanship of bracelets and ornaments..."
[Book of Enoch 8:1]
Menes Honored Ptah as His Own Ancestor,
The Original "Divine Blacksmith": Azazel
If -- as the evidence illustrates -- Ptah was not previously known as a god in Egypt, if Menes therefore brought the worship of the god "Ptah" with him from his country of origin, if Menes was indeed a descendent of the "Watchers" and therefore either related to or directly descended from Azazel, the oft-described original blacksmith who "taught men to make swords, knives"... etc., then it would make perfect sense for Menes to venerate his own illustrious ancestor who "taught women how to enjoy sexual pleasure" and who was also the first and only true "Divine Blacksmith" to teach metallurgy and metalwork to Mankind: Azazel.
Egyptian "Opening of the Mouth" Ritual of "Watcher" Origin?
That "Ptah" means "he who fashioned (created) by... opening up" in the Akkadian (Upper Sumerian) language finds intriguing correlation with the still largely unknown significance associated with Ptah's direct involvement in the Egyptian "Opening of the Mouth" ritual performed after death. During this key ritual, it is Ptah (together with Thoth) who "opens" the mouth of the deceased so as to reintroduce the soul (ka) and re-animate the body/statue/temple thereby, thus "fashioning" the eternal reunification of "body" and "soul."
This provides yet another intriguing correlation between "Ptah" (whose name has no meaning in Egyptian) and this god's name's distinctively Mesopotamian linguistic link with Upper Sumer.
Menes Deified for His "Eternally Firm" Sexual Capacity
Thus, given the preponderance of evidence (of which only the scarcest highlights are provided herein), it would appear quite likely that Menes and others of the Rephaim lineage arrived in Egypt from the Mesopotamian area (Sumer), that he/they succeeded in conquering and uniting both Upper and Lower Egypt, that he/they then established the first Empire on this planet, that Menes built the great city of Memphis and built therein a temple in veneration of his own ancestor, the "Fallen Angel" Azazel under the Akkadian name of Ptah, and that at some point either prior to or subsequent of his death, Menes was in fact deified, becoming the "eternally firm" "Bestower of Male Sexual Prowess", the Sex God Min.
Despite all else accomplished by Menes, he was eternally identified as the preeminent god of male sexual virility, the "Bestower of Male Sexual Prowess" . It would appear something about him so identified him and his "divine ancestry" with "male sexual prowess" that -- notwithstanding his many magnificent accomplishments and characteristics -- it was his "eternally firm" sexuality that most made him a God to his people.
As a sex god, Min's sexual influence was so widespread that almost all later fertility gods throughout Europe and Asia-Minor are based on Him. These include, Bacchus, Pan, Dionysius, Cupid, and Priapus. Unfortunately, all these later sex gods are more largely depicted as wine-swilling gluttons than truly sexual beings. Min stands alone as the most primally and blatantly sexual of all the ancient pagan gods of male fertility, yet ironically also the only example of a sexual deity based wholly upon the "superhuman" sexual characteristics of an actual mortal being, a man who apparently was only one of a "divine" race as equally sexually gifted.
Was Menes (Min/Amsu) a descendant of the "Watchers"... One of the Rephaim?
While there is yet no definitive proof one way or the other -- and probably never will be given the almost-prehistoric time periods involved -- the historical and related circumstancial evidence linking the two is remarkable and worthy of studied consideration. Given the dearth of archaeological evidence that far back in history and the sparcity of records still surviving from such ancient times, it is doubtful that historians will ever be able to determine anything truly conclusive. Nevertheless the parallels and evidences discovered are striking.
However despite the lack of specific archaeological evidence, there does exist ancient Egyptian texts which do specifically name Min as one of the "Watchers." In the "Hymn to Amen-Ra," the god Amen is praised for each of his "divine" attributes as each of the many gods he had by that time (XX-XXI Dynasty) come to represent, including the predynastic sexual god "Min/Amsu." However, only as "Amsu/Min" is Amen described as follows:
"Thou art the untiring watcher, o Amsu-Amen..." (Amsu = Min)
["Hymn to Amen-Ra" (ca XX-XXI Dynasty)]
(http://www.touregypt.net/amenprst.htm) (emphasis added)
Additionally, both King Menes and the Rephaim were considered "demigods" (half human, half god), descended from the Gods, themselves. And as seen above, both originated in the Fertile Crescent area of Sumer ("Land of the Watchers"). Both were regarded as sexual "supermen" (the Rephaim, for their inherently sexual natures as"supermen" in their roles as rp'um, or Dispensers of fertility and seducers and "corruptors" of Human females; Menes, by his deification as the preeminent male sexual deity, "Min," the "Eternal Firm One" and "Bestower of Male Sexual Prowess"). All of these parallels bespeak a race possessing a unique "super"-human sexual capacity of an "eternal"-ly "firm" nature that while revered and venerated by the lusty Egyptians, Sumerians, and Babylonians (to name only a few), was condemned by the Hebrews as resulting in the sensual "corruption" of their females.
Thus, if Menes were a "demigod" with the "superhuman" sexual capacity attributed to his deified form as Min, then so also must "his descendants", also considered "demigods," likewise have possessed this same defining male sexual capacity. Thus it was not a learned skill, but instead a genetic trait passed on to "his descendants" from ancient times down to today, conceivably.
Meanwhile, in Canaan (Israel/Palestine)...
However in Canaan, while quite content to enjoy the gifts of knowledge offered
them by the "Fallen Angels," their celestial benefactors, yet once they began
intermarrying with their females, sharing with them their "Dark" Gift and fully
"awakening" females to their full eroto-emotional potential, Human male jealousy
quckly escalated to full-scale violence.
"...destroy the children of the Watchers from amongst men... Destroy all the
souls addicted to dalliance (lust*),and the offspring of the
Watchers..." [Book of Enoch, Chapter 10; vs 13, 18] * (Knibb, p.
90; cp. Charles, p. 76)
Thus were the first "Vampire" killers of history "divinely" commissioned by the
tenets of this new Canaanite religion that condemned natural multiorgasmic
capacity as "addiction to lust" and those possessing such as under a perpetual
death sentence. Small wonder, then, that only in Judeo-Christian-Islamic
religions and their cultures do we find such inherent misogyny against females
and such a love-hate relationship where sexuality is concerned. And in those
religions where such religious fanaticism, misogynist extremism, and
bloodthirsty intolerance have continued, we witness even today how those
cultures have been stunted in their maturation as a civilization and that today
arguably pose perhaps the single greatest threat to all civilizations upon this
planet.
If only they would, even at this late date, — learn.
And so, as recounted in Genesis 6, the Book of Enoch, and Jubilees, upon making
this "Dark" Gift known, the 200 "Watchers" who visited the area anciently were
vilified as evil, re-named the Nefilim, the "Fallen Angels" (from whence the
religious concepts of Evil and "Satan"/"Iblis", as well as "vampires," directly
derive), and their wonderous gifts of knowledge together with their singular
"Dark" Gift of ultimate sensual and emotional fulfillment were rejected and
their kindnesses repaid with the near-genocidal slaughter of their wives and
children. Their progeny, the Rephaim, were from that time forward hunted
and slaughtered, and have been ever since.
The Tribe of Benjamin of Rephaim Descent?
The Twelve Tribes of Israel of the Bible refer to the progeny of the twelve sons of Jacob, later named Israel (He who strives [wrestles[ with God) by an angel with whom Jacob physically confronted during a pre-dawn encounter. Jacob considered the angel to be God, Himself, and hence the misunderstanding apparent in the name "Israel." Strangely, no explanation is given in the Bible as to why Jacob was "wrestling" with the angel. However, we shall broach this a bit later on.
To Rachel, one of Jacob's wives, were born two of these twelve sons. Namely, Joseph (of the "Coat of Many Colors" fame) and the youngest son of them all, Benjamin. Key to the question of who the remaining Rephaim progeny were in Canaan following the attempted genocide centuries earlier, is the intriguing etymology of the name "Benjamin."
As seen above... "Bene ha-Elohim" literally means "Sons of the Elohim (God/Gods)" in the ancient Hebrew language.
However where the name "Benjamin" is concerned, there is a continuing dispute regarding the meaning of this ancient name. Currently "Benjamin" is translated as meaning either "'son of the south' or 'son of the right hand'". Not exactly synonymous translations, are they? The confusion as to the correct meaning becomes obvious, however, if we examine this word in the context of its language of origin: Aramaic. And in Aramaic, Benjamin becomes "BENYAMN" or "BENYAMIN".
As currently translated by Biblical scholars, BENYAMIN is divided up into the following two words: "BEN" ("Son" [of]) + "YAMN" or "YAMIN" ("South" or "Right Hand"), thus rendering either:
BEN (Son [of]) -YAMIN ("South" or "Right Hand"):
"Son of the South" or "Son of the Right Hand"
The self-evident problem with either translation is the fact that the word "YAMN" exists in neither Hebrew or Aramaic. Thus, its translation has forever been in doubt and continues to be alternately translated as either "South" or "right hand." Hence, the continuing controversy re: which is correct.
Perhaps the mistake lies in assuming "YAMN" was intended as only a single word. Instead of attempting a translation of "YAMN" (yamin) as one word, what if we split the word in two, rendering it: "YA MN" or... "YA MIN"? In Hebrew "YA" (also rendered "HA") means "the". Thus, "BEN-YA-MN" (Ben-ya-min) becomes:
BEN (Son [of]) - YA (the) - MN or MIN (Min) = "Son of the* 'Min'" (Son of Min)
* Whereas in English the article "the" would seem to indicate that the noun thereafter is plural, no such assumption can be made of Aramaic. The word "the" only gives emphasis to the importance of the noun that follows. Thus, a more English-accurate rendition of this phrase is: "Son of Min".
Benjamin as a "Son of (the) Min"
As already explained, "Min" (also spelled "Mn" and "Mnu" in Egyptian) was the predynastic, eternally ithyphallic Egyptian God of "male sexual prowess," known during his lifetime as King Menes. Thus, as Menes had lived and died thousands of years earlier, Min was already an ancient Egyptian deity long before Jacob (Israel) was born. Thus it was, according to all we have theorized, also the name by which one particular Watcher descendant, Menes as "Min", was identified in Egypt.
If this translation is indeed the correct one, the implications are quite far-reaching.
It was during Benjamin's lifetime that the Israelites traveled en masse to Egypt and there began (according to the Old Testament) a 400-year stay. Benjamin spent the rest of his life in Egypt, during which time the Israelites became quite attached to and assimilated into the Egyptian culture and religious way of life, including a full understanding and even venerance for the Egyptian deities, of whom "Min" was one of the greatest. Thus, identifying Rachel's second son with this primeval Sex God and the "Demigods of Manes" or "Shemsu Hor" (sons or followers of Horus), from whom Menes descended, could not but have had a very positive influence on Benjamin's acceptance by the Egyptians as having descended from this same bloodline. Of course as Jacob was most certainly not Menes and therefore not "Min", who lived and died literally thousands of years earlier, why would Jacob name his son "Son of the Min"?
The intriguing possibility hinted at in Genesis is that perhaps Benjamin was not Jacob's son at all, but perhaps of direct Rephaim paternity and was so named not by Jacob... but by his real father. Read more HERE.
It is also important to note that following the reported Exodus back to Canaan, it was specifically the males of the Tribe of Benjamin who were most vilified for their highly decadent sexual natures and ultimately fell victims to yet another sexually motivated genocide that reportedly destroyed the entire Tribe save for only 600 men who succeeded in escaping the slaughter (Judges 19-24).
Benjamin Names His Own Son "Rapha"
While up to this point all previous evidence has not necessarily provided the euphemistic "smoking gun" of a possible connection between Benjamin and the "Watchers," there is one final piece of historical fact that would seem to provide as close a "smoking gun" as might be possible.
Significantly, Benjamin chose to name his fifth son by the very root word from which the term "Rephaim" derives: "RAPHA." (1 Chronicles 8:2), which is one of the singular forms of the plural "Rephaim", thus literally meaning "one of the Rephaim."
As explained in the authoritative Strong's Concordance of the Bible, the Hebrew word RAPHA (Strong's Ref. # 7497) is not a proper name at all, but instead is the term by which the sexually "invigorating" progeny (descendants) of the "Watchers" were identified.
Prior to this, never before in the Old Testament (or Torah) was this word ever used as a proper name. And only once thereafter is "RAPHA" (1 Chronicles 8:37) used again as a proper name, and again it is to name yet another descendant of Benjamin, this time to identify the second son of Moza (one of Benjamin's great-great-great...-grandsons). This same son of Moza is also listed by the name: "REPHAIAH" (1 Chronicles 9:43), another singular form of the plural "Rephaim" and even more linguistically links this name with "REPHAIM".
Thereafter, this name is never again used. The genetic link with the "Watchers" thus validated, the paternal connection historically made, there was apparently no further need to continue applying this strictly "Rephaim" term as a proper name.
Benjamin's Prolific Historical Figures
Many of the notable later historical figures in Hebrew history were of the Tribe of Benjamin, including Israel's first king, Saul, and even the more noted "King of the Jews", Jesus, (through his mother's lineage). Mary Magdalene, likewise falsely vilified in the Sixth Century by the Catholic faith as a "fallen woman", also appears to have been of the Tribe of Benjamin. So also the Apostle Paul, most responsible for the establishment of the Christian Church, proudly declared himself of the Tribe of Benjamin (Romans 11:1).
"Galileans... were Benjamites"
In fact, there is strong evidence that most if not all of Jesus' disciples were of the Tribe of Benjamin. This is due to the fact that the province known as "Galilee" belonged to the Tribe of Benjamin. Thus to be a "Galilean" was to be a Benjamite.
"It is known, by most Bible students, that the Galileans of Christ's time, on earth, were Benjaminites."
"At His Ascension into heaven the angels called His disciples, "Ye men of Galilee..." At Pentecost, all of the disciples who spoke in tongues were identified as Galileans and as Jesus' witnesses. Yes, the witnessing did begin in Jerusalem, but the witnesses were identified as Galileans."
[http://www.israelect.com/reference/Willie-Martin/Galilean.html]
Additionally, the cities of Nazareth (town most identified with Jesus), Capernaum (where Jesus first announced his Messianic mission), Cana (where Jesus turned water into wine... possibly at his own wedding), and Magdala (town most identified with Mary Magdalene) are all in Galilee and at that time populated predominantly by Benjamites. And of course there is the Sea of Galilee where so many other great miracles occurred.
As it is well known, it was in Galilee that Jesus ostentatiously spent most of his ministry, being also identified often in scripture as "Jesus of Galilee."
It is further interesting to note that the very city of Jerusalem was originally a Benjamite city, given to the Tribe of Benjamin for their inheritance. It wasn't until the advent of King David that Jerusalem was claimed by him as his royal city and henceforth became a property of his own Tribe of Judah.
Of particular import, Moses himself pronounced regarding the Tribe of Benjamin thusly:
"And of Benjamin he said, The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him; and the Lord shall cover him all the day long, and he shall dwell between his shoulders." [Deuteronomy 33:12]
And who might this "beloved of the Lord" be? It could not have been Jesus, specifically, for he was most certainly not "covered" nor "dwell(ed) in safety by" Benjamin "all the day long" (obviously a metaphoric reference to some considerable passage of time). While there is much stronger evidence available regarding who also the Tribe of Benjamin is and who exactly the "beloved of the Lord" refers to, the brief explanation given here suffices for now.
And what of today?
As seen above and as recorded by the ancient
Egyptians, the Watchers did indeed arrive in Egypt from Sumer ("Land of the
Watchers"). And as also shown, these "Watchers" (or rather their descendants,
the Rephaim) were not at all the demonic, blood-thirsty "giants" claimed by the
Hebrews. Instead, it was thanks to the Watchers' descendants that Egypt rose to
become Earth's first known Empire, one that lasted 3,000 years - longer than any
other known civilization on this planet.
The question now becomes, where
are the "Watchers'" (the Rephaim), today?
All evidence seems to point to
the simplest and most rational explanation: they have assimilated into all races
over the millennia. This becomes evident even from Egyptian dynastic times.
While Menes (Min) and his immediate progenitors, the "Demigods of Manes" were
undoubtably quite pure-blood "Rephaim," yet there exists no significant accounts
of a tradition of such sexually superior males in ancient Egypt continuing much
beyond Menes' life. This could be due to one of two factors: societal rejection
and ultimate persecution of Rephaim males by "normal" males within the same
society resulting in their expulsion and/or extermination, or genetic
dissipation of this trait through successive generations of intermarrying and
breeding with Egyptian women. Or perhaps a combination of both.
Regardless of the effect or extent of any possible societal rejection and
persecution, as the Rephaim males married and had children by first Hebrew, then
Sumerian, then Egyptian women during the first few hundred years of their
"arrival," their genetic influences on each successive generation would have
undoubtably waned until their descendants' genetic capacity for multiorgasmic
sex would have quickly begun to skip whole generations, becoming an
ever-increasingly recessive genetic trait.
However, there is also
tantalizing evidence that there might have been at least one isolated Rephaim
tribe who succeeded in surviving fairly well intact far into the Middle Ages.
From Canaan to Eastern Europe...
As a result of the ancient Extermination Order against them and as perpetuated down the ages ever since, for more than 7,000 years following this first-ever massacre, the surviving descendants of the bene ha elohim have lived largely hidden and estranged from Humankind, their history almost unknown and their "Dark" Gift enjoyed but with few outside Human females. Cut off from their celestial fathers by the near-genocidal slaughter of their families, these children of woe have been hunted through the ages, never able to rest for long, ever seeking a place of ultimate refuge, a sanctuary against the oppression, the lies, and the horrors endured throughout history. Vilified anciently as the "damned" and by Christianity as the "hungry undead," this empathetic and sensually unique male angelic progeny, known as the Rephaim, have been condemned to roam the Earth as outcasts so long as mono-orgasmic males continue in their sexual inequality and emotional insecurity with multiorgasmic females, their sensual and emotional superiors.
Shortly following the First Millenium C.E. (A.D.), the mortal descendents of the Fallen Angels (the Rephaim) found their sexual gifts again the source of rising persecution reminiscent of the persecutions suffered by their "Watcher" ancestors, anciently. This time however, they found themselves regarded as supernatural not as "angels" or "demons," but instead -- as Vampires:
"...in the puritanical words of the Book of Enoch these corrupted souls (the progeny of the "Fallen Angels") are also destined to become the damned, who will 'take no food, [but nevertheless hunger] and thirst'... in East European folklore, as well as in popular romance, there are likewise supernatural denizens that drink blood yet can 'take no food, [but can nevertheless hunger] and thirst', and these are, of course, nosferatu - vampires."
"Romantic writers, for instance, became transfixed by the stories of the Sons of God coming unto the Daughters of Men, and began to feature these devilish characters in their poetic works. A little later, Victorian painters started portraying this same subject matter on canvas. One might even be tempted to suggest that the Book of Enoch was a major inspiration behind the darker excesses of the so-called Gothic revival, which culminated in such literary works as Bram Stoker's Dracula, in which the eponymously named character is himself a fallen angel."
["From the Ashes of Angels", Collins, p. 21, 1996] (emphasis added)
And again... yet another reference to the "Fallen Angels," who were most identified historically in the Book of Enoch for their supposed "addiction to lust." So, what has this to do with ... vampires?
As Nosferatu, the "Plague Carrier"...
In Christian times, the Rephaim were vilified as "vampires" first not as blood drinkers but as carriers of the plague "Consumption" (Tuberculosis) due to the manner in which the sexual euphorias of their "Dark" Gift tended to exhaust their erotically potentiated female lovers to such a high degree of endorphin-saturated euphoria that they often exhibited the same listless, emaciated appearance of those suffering from the dreaded disease. Hence, the name by which the Rephaim were first vilified in the Common Era: "nesuferit", better known by its Romanian colloquialism: "Nosferatu (from the Greek "nosophorus" meaning "Plague Carrier").
The Historic Slavic Vampire (Nosferatu), as per the actual
accounts: old Slavonic word "nosufur-atu" or "nesuferit", both from
the Greek: "nosoprhoos" ("plague carrier")
While the Slavic vampire was known by a variety of names, including upir'
and vampir, the name that perhaps most immediately reveals its
other-than-blood-drinking uniqueness is the name by which this male creature was
known in the environs of the Carpathian mountains of Romania's Transylvania.
Namely, "Nosferatu":
"The most common view on the Nosferatu was
its destructive nature and libido, which can drive it to meticulously
destroy entire populations, while still engaging in wild orgies and
passionate sex with the living... The Nosferatu's name is roughly translated
to mean "plague bearer," and was said to spread tuberculosis..."
[http://www.chaotic-gods.com/species/nosferatu.php]
Yet, what has tuberculosis to do with vampires? Well, when closely examined...
not much, in fact. That is, except for the symptoms.
The original
Nosferatu legends, as told by the actual inhabitants of the Carpathian
mountains, describe not a blood-sucker, but instead a highly libidinous being
whose "insatiable", "prodigious sexual appetites" resulted in
"sexual orgies" causing his lovers to "weaken and become ill with exhaustion",
further becoming "exhausted and emaciated" as such non-stop multiorgasmic
encounters continued, symptoms very similar to the dread disease
"Consumption" (Tuberculosis), from whence the name, Nosferatu ("plague
carrier") originates.
Despite the "Gothic," 19th-Century,
pulp-fiction tales of the impotent, asexual vampire, the true Nosferati
(plural) of Eastern Europe had very little in common with these sexless,
Victorian-Age, blood-drinking, fang-wielding, daylight and crucifix-fearing
creatures.
From "Plague Carriers" to Demonic Blood-drinking "Vampires"...
Let the Slaughters Begin Anew!
As had occurred anciently with the "Fallen Angels," so also upon the arrival of the Christian communities at this time in Eastern Europe, females encountering this native population of male Rephaim were inherently drawn to the deeper emotional and erotic capacities of this native race and began to prefer them as husbands and lovers over the mono-orgasmic males of their own culture. And as had likewise occurred anciently, so began anew the vilification and then demonization of the local Rephaim as first "plague carriers" (Nosferati) and then, when this did not dissuade females, later as "blood drinkers," the "Undead," and ultimately as demonic beings... all so highly reminiscent of the near-identical demonizations fabricated against their ancestral fathers, the "Fallen Angels." And exactly as had occurred anciently as well, so began the persecutions and then the wholesale slaughter of all those condemned as "vampires," just as had happened to the families of the original "Fallen Angels."
Given Catholicism's and Orthodox Christianity's views of carnality as evil, it
was not long before such sensual expression was condemned and labeled satanic.
In particular, the Rephaim were vilified as vampires and hunted down as such.
And women were fed horrific stories of fanged blood-drinking creatures who walk
the night in search of female "victims." This quickly degenerated into the
fodder for pulp fiction of the Age culminating in Bram Stoker's "Dracula", thus
solidifying forever the image and legendary characteristics of the "gothic
vampire."
Throughout Medieval times the slanders and vilifications instigated by the "Sons of Jared" (the ancient nemeses of the Rephaim) and the celibate ecclesiastical puppets they created to further their hideous purposes, grew to their greatest levels since the Canaanite massacres of old, and the Rephaim were again hunted to near extinction. Through the horrific lies depicting them as the bloodthirsty demonic "Undead," almost all of Europe was whipped into murderous hysteria. The original accounts speak of entire villages of supposed "vampires," their families and children, being targeted for slaughter. Obviously, these villages were not graveyards but actual villages of mortal inhabitants living and working in their own communities. Additionally, other accounts speak of "vampires" having been chased out of their homes and later found living in other villages and working therein being captured and taken from their new homes back to the original villages and executed there.
An intriguing treatise on the nosferatu, in particular, is found at an
interesting website that provides poignant, though not wholly intentional,
insight into the sexual mores challenged by the actual sexually "insatiable"
Rephaimite male, as vilified as the nosferatu:
"Beginning, then, with Stoker’s Count Dracula, the vampire embodies untempered
lust. His appetite has made him a monster, cursed to live outside of society,
beyond the will of God... The Count charms beautiful young women from their beds
to receive his kiss, seducing them into a state of wanton submission. He is the
ruling alpha male, powerful, aggressive, and dominant. It is his desire that
matters, not that of his devotees. This point of view reflects the sexual
politics of its era. Women are passive receivers of sex, never equal partners or
initiators. And while they may partake of some degree of pleasure, there is
always some pain and suffering involved, at least in the beginning.
"Moreover, the idea that one night with the hungry vampire can vanquish a young
woman’s spiritual virtue reflects the Christian ideology that virgin females are
purer and more sacred than their sexually active counterparts for their likeness
with the Virgin Mother of Jesus. In addition, the tale of the Old World vampire
serves as a warning for adolescent girls. Forsake...the handsome stranger and
love a boy whose family your family knows for the wanderer in fine clothes with
an exotic accent will take advantage of you.
"From the masculine point of view, this same idea signals a pervasive fear that
you, too, could lose your woman to the powerful enchantments of another man evil
enough to ignore your claim to her... Another implication here is the fear that
a man who cannot fully arouse and pleasure his wife will lose her to one who
can...
"Viewing this again through the spectrum of sexual mores, the Nosferatu is a man
who has lost his intellect, self-control, and humanity to his lust. Everything
he does from his first to his last waking hour of every evening relates to
satisfying his need for pleasure. He is unable to focus on anything else because
to him, there is nothing else. And once again, responsibility to protect his
intended “victim” falls upon another man. Be wary, gentlemen, of other men who
might seek to ravage your woman, this story seems to say. And to the women, the
message is much the same as in Dracula, only perhaps more fervent. Some men are
sex monsters waiting to devour you. Be careful who you trust. Again, there is
the paradigm of pleasure and guilt. There seems to be no third option of a
female who seeks out the vampire’s bite for the female is always the passive
victim." [The Forbidden: Past and Recent Vampires as
Symbols of Changing Sexual Mores by Michelle Engel] (emphasis
added)
While surely unintended, yet the views expressed above regarding the perceived
motives of the Nosferatu, as well as those of both their female "victims" and
their self-appointed male "saviors," parallel remarkably with the truths
regarding vampires as presented and discussed herein and, earlier, exactly the
attitudes reflected by men during the time of the "Fallen Angels." The
nosferati
would indeed have been thought predatory sex addicts by the mono-orgasmic male
"saviors"-of-feminine-virtue, while all "God-fearing" females would have been
seen as defenseless potential victims in need of constant and vigilant sexual
protection therefrom. Yet, as suggested by the article's refreshingly observant
female author, this view is entirely sexist in that it presupposes that the
female could not possibly find herself attracted to — much less benefited by —
such males equally possessing unlimited sexual capacity.
Transylvania and Gothic "Vampirism"
With the same fervor by which the Egyptians adored sensuality, the ancient Hebrews abhorred same. Hence the Rephaim's forced migration into Egypt (Menes and his "Rephaim" family, called "Shemsu Hor" by the Egyptians) and Babylon, following the ancient slaughter and expulsion of the Rephaim from the Palestine/Israel area. Thereafter, as the Greeks and then the Romans conquered and supplanted the ancient religions and cultures of the Mediterranean and Mideastern societies with their own, the Rephaim were forced to seek new homes elsewhere. Evidently, either before or after the appearance of the "Watchers" in Egypt, at least one tribe of the Rephaim chose as home the Eastern European area of the Carpathian mountains known as Transylvania. Here, this Rephaimic tribe flourished discreetly for centuries, if not millennia. Chiefest of those belonging to this Rephaim tribe may have been those of the royal Racoczi family line, into which line was born the mysterious Cmte. (Count) Saint Germain (coincidentally reputed to be both of great age [several hundred years] and a vampire, though considered by women -- including the infamous Mdme. de Pompadour -- as a superior lover to other men, much to the displeasure and envy of another contemporary, the Master Skirtchaser archetype himself, Giovanni Casanova).
However, despite establishing themselves well in Transylvania and its environs, with the rise of Christianity a very similar anti-sexual attitude again arose forbodingly reminiscent of the ancient Hebrews. However, unlike the relatively limited sphere of influence of ancient Judaism, Christianity's influence and negative attitudes toward sensuality soon permeated all of the Western World, including Eastern Europe. Here, as in Palestine anciently, these early Eastern European Christians soon adopted this same belief system and increasingly began to take an equally dim view of the sensual "corruption" of their females, as well. And as had been done in Palestine five thousand years earlier, the Rephaim in Romania and surrounding districts were again regarded as a supernatural threat... though this time not from any source remotely resembling the divine.
The Historic "Dark Gift" of Unlimited Orgasmic Capacity in the Male:
The Genetic Legacy of the "Fallen Angels" and their progeny, the Slavic
"Vampire"
Equally "Insatiable" Females Slaughtered as "Witches"...
Not content with the near-genocidal slaughter of the Rephaim who had all been
vilified and largely slaughtered during this more contemporary period as
"vampires" rather than "fallen angels," the ecclesiastical powers-that-be turned
their murderous attentions upon the remaining segment of the population whose
sexual capacities were equally as great as were those of the "vampires": namely,
almost the entire Human female gender. Of course, rather than vilifiying them as
"vampires,"their task was made far easier thanks to the Old Testament mandate:
"Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." (Exodus 22:18).
Thus, if it were possible to vilify females also by linking their truly natural
multiorgasmic capacity with witchcraft, as they had already accomplished so
successfully in vilifying the Rephaim's unique multiorgasmic capacity with
"vampirism" and that of their ancient forefathers with being "fallen angels,"
then the step to the additional slaughter of all such females would simply be
the next logical step and in full obedience to the Old Testament edict. Thus,
"God's" work brought to its full fruition in the "Final Solution"-esque
eradication of all multiorgasmics from this planet.
In 1487 CE, two Dominican monks, who had previously been fully endowed by Pope
Innocent VIII in 1484 with unlimited prosecutory powers against "witches,"
Heinrich Kramer and James Sprenger, penned the truly despicable and virulently
misogynist Malleus Maleficarum (the "Witches' Hammer"). Doing to females what
Goebbels' own propaganda had done to the Jews of the Holocaust, the Malleus
Maleficarum was used as the handbook by all Church-sponsored and privately
operating inqisitors and magistrates throughout Europe for centuries thereafter
in the wholesale slaughter of women across the continent. While it has been
amply stated following these horrific centuries of slaughter that women were
targeted primarily for having been midwives, free-thinking women, healers, or
otherwise generally undermining male authority, yet despite statements like
these found in such commentaries as well as the pop-culture explanations of such
movies as "The Da Vinci Code," the "Malleus" defines quite minutely what is and
is not witchcraft and the reason for which women were specifically targeted for
imprisonment, torture, and slaughter as witches:
"To conclude: All witchcraft comes from carnal lust,
which is in women insatiable." [Malleus Maleficarum, Question VI; 1487 CE]
And there it was, the same equivalent term of "insatiable" "carnal lust"
repackaged and vilified once again as a capital crime. Only now, this term was
made inextricably linked with and, in fact, the single defining characteristic
of "witchcraft."
As the word "orgasm" was not even coined until the beginning of the 20th
Century, the meaning of "insatiable" "carnal lust" would have been crystal clear
to anyone of that time period and not at all meant to be metaphoric or only
obliquely euphemistic. "Insatiable" "carnal lust" speaks solely and directly to
a female's natural multiorgasmic capacity. And as witchcraft was singularly
defined by the Malleus as proceeding solely from a female's natural absence of a
Male Refractory Period following a single orgasm, then it was this same natural
"insatiable" "carnal lust" that condemned her to death as a witch.
As previously seen throughout history, this same capacity was identical to the
"fallen angels'" "addict(ion) to lust" and the later "vampires'" "insatiable
sexual appetite" for which multiorgasmic capacity those groups of males were
likewise hunted down and slaughtered. Of course, as women could not be vilified
as "fallen angels" nor as "vampires" (their male multiorgasmic equivalents), yet
the Old Testament verse of Exodus 22:18 that witches should not be permitted to
live provided the Roman Catholic Church with the perfect means by which to
label, vilify, and likewise slaughter women. And so, having already destroyed by
genocide almost the entire population of the Rephaim then living, the Catholic
Church inevitably turned the crosshairs of its anti-multiorgasmic murder machine
onto the only remaining, yet also the largest multiorgasmic segment of the Human
population: females.
As early as 1404, well before the mass murder of women reached its zenith, the
Papal fathers had already burned at least 30,000 women. So many women were
murdered that it could be said that the Church was attempting no less than a
wholesale genocide of women—"sexocide" as Lederer (1973) put it.
"Often all the women in a given area were rounded up by the Catholic
authorities. Those who were exceedingly attractive were then hideously sexually
tortured and then slaughtered by burning, boiling in oil, crushing, and via
whatever device the religious authorities felt appropriate or which suited their
sick minds. In Germany huge ovens were constructed for the purposes of mass
female murder." [Achterberg, 1991; Lederer 1968].
And so it was also with the wives and families of the "Fallen Angels" thousands
of years earlier, and for the same reason: "insatiable" "carnal lust." This same
charge of sexual insatiability and thus being "addicted to (lust)" was identical
to that also apparently possessed by the Eastern European vampire. In fact, the
very word "upir" (from which the word "vampyr" is derived) as been translated
frequently as meaning "witch." Thus it would seem that, given the mindset of
that time and place, the term "vampire" itself proceeds directly from the
"witch"-like characteristic of "insatiable" "carnal lust" by which women and
they were most notably identified.
Thus throughout history we see that, in the minds of the majority of sexually
"normal" men, far better that anyone possessing such sexual insatiability be
slaughtered than to cause "normal" men to acknowledge themselves as less
sexually capable and run the risk of being considered less sexually desirable by
their would-be damsels-in-distress. And so rather than permit such, the "Fallen
Angels" and the nosferati all found themselves forever vilified as sexual
aggressors and predators, as would-be rapists. Females, on the other hand, at
least were given a choice. They could either be equally vilified and condemned
for admitting and enjoying their insatiable sexual capacities, or else they
could repent of their "witchcraft" and submit instead to being "virtuous"
females outwardly content and satisfied with the "one-orgasm-fits-all"
lovemaking of their "normal" mono-orgasmic male lovers.
And so we have come full circle from the vilfications and resulting slaughter of
the "Fallen Angels" and their families and the subsequent blame placed on all
such for the sensual "corruption" of females resulting in the destruction of all
Mankind via the Great Deluge, to the vilifications and slaughters of both
"vampires" and "witches" in far more recent history for also being sexually
"insatiable." And thus we find also revealed the principal cause throughout
recorded history for all these vilifications and persecutions upon sensually
"insatiable" females and their Rephaimite male sexual equals: mono-orgasmic male
ego and insecurity.
Summary of Evidence
This research has provided only a brief synopsis of a few highlights from the
volume of accumulated evidence compiled thus far on this subject. Soon an entire
website shall be made available providing a much clearer and more complete
picture of all currently available evidence, including an extensive timeline
investigation of Rephaim history, as far as can best be determined.
However, so far we have traced the "Watchers" from the arrival of 200 of their
number upon a mountain called "Ardis," somewhere in the Palestine area. Their
arrival was specifically for the purpose of engaging in as much sex as possible
with human females and teaching them how to "enjoy sexual pleasures" previously
unknown. Children were born to them also possessing many of the same traits as
their "divine" fathers. These children were called by many names, predominant
among them was "The Rephaim," whose name has direct reference to sexual "vigor"
and "virility." The Rephaim were later reportedly destroyed, yet continued
references to living Rephaim and "giants" appear throughout the Old Testament
(Numbers: 13:22; 13:28-33; Deut: 1:28; 2:1-; 9:2; Joshua: 11:21-22; 14:12;
14:15; 15:13-14; Judges: 1:20), thus they obviously did survive.
In Egypt, many reports have been discovered referencing the arrival of
predynastic half-men/half-gods called the "Demigods of Manes" who were
immigrants from the land of Sumer, a term which in both Sumerian and Epyptian
means "The Land of the Watchers." A descendant of these "Demigods" was a man
known as Menes, Narmer, or "The Scorpion King." It was Menes who succeeded in
transforming an entire country of warring factions into the world's first and
still longest-lasting Empire.
As we have also seen, despite King Menes' enormous accomplishments he was not
deified nor revered for any of these as much as for his apparent superior sexual
capacity as the Sex God "Min." Again, the Watchers' descendants still retaining
the apparent "eternally firm", "super" "fertility" characteristics that have
always personified who and what they were.
And finally, we arrive at the Gothic accounts that also link the "Watchers" and
their descendants with the "Vampire" legends of the "Nosferati" as "handsome
young" men possessing "an insatiable sexual appetite," causing their lovers to
appear "exhausted and emaciated" following the enjoyment of the multiorgasmic
euphorias shared. And just as had occurred anciently, so also these Rephaim
descendants were likewise vilified and persecuted, primarily so as to keep women
from "enjoy(ing) sexual pleasures" otherwise unattainable.
Thus the "Dark Gift" has continued down through the millennia as both a gift and
a curse to its possessors.
The "Dark" Gift Scientifically Documented...
"A close analysis will show that the only emotions which in the long run harm
are those arising from sex impulses, and when we have realized this, we have put
a finger on the actual point of danger." [Bram Stoker, author of Dracula
"The Censorship of Fiction". The Nineteenth Century and After; September 1908.
Quoted in "Bram Stoker"; Barbara Belford, 1996, p.312]
As the Truth is as hidden today as anciently while men's emotional and sexual insecurities remain just as much a threat as ever before, one man chose to finally come forward and have the Rephaimic "Dark" Gift of his bloodline, long declared by Science to be "physiologically impossible" for males, fully documented in a laboratory setting for the first time in history in hopes that through scientific understanding, future "Dark Ages" might be avoided.
Funded via a research grant from the Foundation for the Scientific Study of Sexuality (FSSS) and conducted at Rutgers University by one of the world's most renowned female sexologists, this true "Dark" Gift was quite successfully demonstrated for the first time in history to the amazement of all scientists present and subsequently published in a major professional, American scientific journal (JSET) in 1998, thereafter presented at a number of sexological conferences, including the 13th World Congress of Sexology, and additionally featured in many major magazines including Redbook, Psychology Today, Maxim, Playboy, Playgirl and Penthouse, to name only a few.
Predictably once this unprecedented case study was unimpeachably published in a scientific journal, efforts were immediately taken to scare the scientific community by portraying this capacity as a potential threat to the future stability of all societies. And apparently, they have succeeded: no further research has been accomplished in this specific area for fear that any such might make possible the proliferation of this "Dark" Gift among all Human male populations. As a result, no subsequent documentation of this capacity has since been attempted anywhere else in the world and no further research has been funded or conducted since the Study was first published over a decade ago.
Final Thoughts and Portents for the Future — from the Research Subject, Himself
"To the same degree that many men today might consider such males as ourselves a
threat to their ability to sexually and romantically attract females, so did
they then. While welcomed in Sumer and Egypt, yet in ancient Canaan and later
during the Middle Ages, we were vilified as inherently 'evil' and a danger to
the lives and 'souls' of females everywhere. In particular during the Middle
Ages in Eastern Europe, to 'protect' the Christian women of Medieval Europe from
such sensual 'demonic possession,' first the communities then the local clergy
and ultimately the Church branded those of us exhibiting this naturally
multiorgasmic capacity with the particularly terrifying label: nosferatu.
"To frighten women and arouse the wrath of the local populaces we were
slanderously depicted as creatures of the night, as the 'Undead,' as parasites
that suck the life from the female living. And while these outrageous lies
succeeded in their purposes against us, ultimately resulting in many deaths and
forcing us to leave Eastern Europe en masse, yet they also have ironically
spawned a rich tapestry of folklore, literature, and film that despite its total
lack in truthful basis, still even today retains some of the original sense of
eroticism that is the literal embodiment of who and what we truly are and always
have been; perhaps in the end a fitting and lasting tribute to the 'Dark' Legacy
of which I, for one, am physiologically part.
"Would I term this capacity a 'Dark' Gift? Perhaps. Undoubtably all examples of
unusual ability, capacity, or power can be employed for both good and evil. And
all such examples can be perceived by Society as being either inherently good or
evil. Thus such a determination depends largely upon both the attitudes of the
possessor and the 'possessed,' (I use that term metaphorically, only), the
Rephaim male and the Society in which he resides. Of course, as present-day
Society is as unaware of this capacity's potential for social and sexual
evolution as were the medieval communities that spawned the nosferatu legends,
there is always the 'danger' of evil, — but not to Society and certainly not to
women, the true benefactors of this Gift. The danger lies, as it always has, in
Society's stereotypical reaction to that which it does not understand: fear,
suspicion, vilification, condemnation, and ultimately, if permitted, —
eradication. Only through scientific research, such as with this first-ever
research study, and public awareness can it be possible to have understood that
which has forever been misunderstood. And such has been my quest since
discovering my own uniqueness and seeking research of it.
"As women have been unable to fully realize their true sexual and emotional
potentials with their MRP-limited male partners, it is hoped that as a result of
the research now initiated the day may come when Science may unlock the secrets
to MRP and both sexes might one day meet on truly equal sexual grounds and
realize a sexual compatibility and an emotional fulfillment together never
before possible. This, then, is the true 'Dark Gift' that we, the descendants of
the original Rephaim, have expressed and enjoyed with women, our sexual and
emotional equals, throughout history, and that is hoped — through continued
research — might someday be offered all men.
"Should it someday become possible to finally bridge this greatest of all sexual
chasms separating men and women, it is my hope that both sexes might then find
it much easier to resolve their many lesser differences, for the unparalleled
benefit and fulfillment of all."