Sunday, October 20, 2013 2:52 PM
Hello Richard!
My name is Yaroslav, I'm majoring in biotechnology, and my research paper in molecular biology for this term will be about inhibition of Male Refractory Period by multiorgasmic men. Would you be so please to answer on my questions?..
Maybe you are so far now from the topic and totally emerged into other interests. Or maybe you will be interested to return to the multiorgasmic male studyings. In my research I'm not looking for funding to go on. I'm looking for communication with like-minded friends, because the shared experience can help a lot as for ourselves in understanding, acquiring, and mastering the skills, as well as for our children and people who come on.
No matter would you respond or not, I thank you a lot for you great job at labs of Mrs. Whipple and at your multiorgasmic website.
Monday, October 21, 2013 6:15 AM
Hello Yaroslav,
Thank you for your email and your inquiry, though I am not sure we are speaking of the same thing. By your email address and your references to “acquiring and mastering the skills” of multiorgasmic capacity, it seems to me what you are actually referencing are Taoist-based ejaculation-control techniques, which can be acquired and mastered… yet are antithetical to the entirely natural and technique-free multiorgasmic response documented in the male research subject of our study. Of course, you also mentioned that you are preparing a research paper hinting at investigation into a possible biological solution to MRP, which is exactly what the male subject was born without and evidences that you do understand the difference.. Thus, I would enjoy hearing back from you on what it is you are seeking to accomplish and what assistance I might be able to lend.
To answer your question, I am still very interested in this topic despite (or, perhaps, in part because of) the strangely apathetic reaction this topic continues to receive from all in the sex sciences as well as the medical/pharmaceutical industry. Thank you for your email and your kind words. I would also be curious to discover how you obtained my name.
Sincerely,
Richard
Monday, October 21, 2013 9:53 PM
As for me, multiorgasmic performance is similar to infinitive universe and boundless ocean. To live and play in it we need to move, fly, and swim. Even the most gifted fish need to guide its fins, otherwise it would lay at the very bottom and get nowhere. From the other hand, no matter how much we were granted by the birth, multiorgasmic art is our school for all the life, and the more we acquire the more fascinating is to discover new dimensions, applications, and mysteries of that art. So are you sure you conquer all the heights of your multiorgasmic potential?..
I try to comprehend and perceive all multiorgasmic techniques, studies, and approaches. It's easy to criticize. I prefer to find out the ideas that are novel and incentive. Experience of other personalities enrich my own circle of interest. What I prefer to research is how women can use multiorgasmic potency of their beloved men for revitalization and rejuvenation, as well as how orgasmizing altogether with different forms of sublimation may help in awakening and extending of the humans conscience.
It wasn't difficult to figure out who was the Rutger's Subject. Several media revealed the name. And after all, it was amazing to see that the the only person who was really interested at that research were you and not Whipple, or Komisaruk, or somebody else. Ph.Docs were too far from the male multiorgasmic topic. It seems that with much greater enthusiasm Mrs. Whipple would scan brains of masturbating women while Mr. Komisaruk would measure palsied rats. The only epicenter of real enthusiasm about investigating of your multiorgasmic capacities were and are you.
Have you ever experienced in your life the postorgasmic refractory period?
What, on your mind, is the reason of MRP? Does it the release of prolactin or oxytocin inhibit the erection and potency?
After you ejaculated, did your erection and potency increase? Or did they stay at the same level?
Before you took the session at home, how long did you abstain from ejaculation? I mean, to be able to milk 13 ml in 50 minutes you were needed at least 24 hours after the last ejaculation?
Yaroslav
Monday, October 21, 2013 10:35 PM
I am… impressed! I had no idea such information was so easily obtained online. You also seem to have quite handily condensed my experience with the two prolific sex researchers down to only a few sentences. Again, very impressive.
While I am and always will be very appreciative to both Drs. Whipple and Komisaruk, yet after the study was published and the excitement it initially drew was reaching its peek (standing room only when presented at the 13th World Congress of Sexology in Valencia, Spain with professional publications clamoring for more, as Dr. Whipple told me), yet within weeks of that international presentation something happened that instantaneously had both researchers do just about everything in their power to cease any further interest in the topic. I have found this mirrored repeatedly over the years not only from those in the research community I have approached (which I initially did after the sudden change in attitude by Whipple and Komisaruk), but… since then… have witnessed time and time again from those researchers who occasionally contact me via the website.
Each time a sex researcher has contacted me (including a few very well-respected names, one of whom used my study in a published paper of his own calling for research into MRP), the response is always at first very positive and excited on the part of the researcher in telling me exactly what they have envisioned doing and usually soon send a tentative research proposal. Yet then just as suddenly as had been their first contact, I never hear from them, again. It’s as if the moment they begin the process of formally seeking funding and cooperation from others in the sex sciences, somehow the idea gets shut down by someone at a higher (or highest) level. If I were a more suspicious man, I would think this a deliberate conspiracy to keep this topic as taboo as it has always been. Perhaps this explains why, after more than 3,000 years, we still know no more about MRP than did the ancient Taoists… and aren’t likely to learn any more in the future, either. Small wonder, therefore, the only “solution” continues to be those same ancient techniques created based on the entirely false premise that ejaculation is bad for one’s health because it’s actually spinal-cerebral fluid (?!) and, thus, should be retained, etc. To believe in this day and age such ridiculousness indicates a lack of scientific advancement wholly on par with believing the Earth is still flat.
To answer your questions:
No, I have not experienced a post-orgasmic refractory period in which, after one or any number of fully ejaculatory orgasms, I could not retain my erection. I am currently 54 years of age.
As for the cause of MRP… wow! I wish I had a clue to that. My inclination is that it must be genetic in that it is a physiological uniqueness with which certain men are born. Were it a “technique,” then just as with Tantric (Indian) and Taoist (Chinese) techniques for teaching men how to mimic natural multiorgasmic capacity, there would long ago have been such techniques or “secrets” revealed in at least one other culture of how to eradicate MRP. And yet… history is entirely silent on this as also is science (well, until my study). Actually, I don’t think history is entirely silent on this … but if not silent, then where such is indicated in a particular race of “angelic” descendants, this capacity was demonized and all found possessing it condemned to death, hence the silence that has reigned ever since.
After ejaculation, does my erection or potency increase? I’m not sure it actually increases given that, at orgasm, I’m about as hard and aroused as I can be. Now, there are occasions when after orgasms my erection will become a bit less rock hard (as it were), yet the erection remains and I’m able to continue on immediately, regaining that greater hardness as I build toward the next orgasm. However… what I do usually find is that while each successive orgasm results in less and less ejaculate, yet the pleasure experienced increases more and more with each one. Now… this is not at all indicative of any causal link between the two. Instead, what is happening is that each orgasm releases endorphins on top of those just released in the previous orgasm, thus increasing the pleasure and leading to a lovely hyperorgasmic “high.” This, of course, has nothing to do with the amount of ejaculate remaining. Hence, the two are not linked causally. According to Dr. Whipple, who I asked about this after the study while she was reviewing the results, she stated that this is very similar to what is experienced by those enjoying a “high” brought about by opiates as these also release an overload of endorphins as do full multiple orgasms (something not possible in non-ejaculatory orgasms, by the way, as such do not rise to the pleasure levels of full ejaculation that release such). Of course, unlike opiate drug use, such multiorgasmic sex is entirely healthy and wonderful! J
Prior to the home session after the actual study, I specifically refrained from any orgasms for eight days.
- Richard
Monday, October 21, 2013 10:57 PM
One correction to the response below:
Where I wrote re: hyperorgasmic euphoria not being possible in non-ejaculatory multiple orgasms, what I meant by this were those non-ejaculatory orgasms caused by deliberately stopping the body from experiencing full orgasm (i.e., by deliberately preventing the highly pleasurable and endorphin-releasing ejaculatory contractions through the use of cognitive techniques). This is why, to date, only women have reported such euphorias given that in multiple orgasms, women do not stop the highly pleasurable orgasmic contractions that, in men, cause ejaculation. Why should they? ;)
Unfortunately for men, until or unless MRP is defeated, they have no choice; they must either learn to have only a single orgasm per erection or else learn a variation on two options: either learn to “ride the wave” by approaching ejaculatory inevitability without going over and enjoy those near-orgasmic pleasures until they finally have a full orgasm… or else use learned cognitive techniques to stop ejaculation once they have gone over into the first phase of orgasm, thus preventing a full orgasm from occurring.
While I fully appreciate and agree with your view that all such techniques are worthy of consideration and experimentation by men as this is the only option available thus far, yet coming from my point of view as a natural multiorgasmic, such techniques are VERY akin to taking a bite of rich moist delicious chocolate cake, savoring the flavors while in the mouth, yet then spitting it out rather than swallowing it. True, you do get to experience some of the joys of eating… yet even bulimics know it is next to impossible to put food in your mouth and then spit it out, again. That’s why they “purge,” thereafter, despite the damage it causes to their bodies. It is too much a sacrifice for them to spit out the food as this is such an inherently pleasurable part of eating, too! It doesn’t matter that the taste buds are only on the tongue; there is still great secondary pleasure in FULLY experiencing the food by swallowing it. Same with the orgasmic contractions following the first rush of pleasure in orgasm.)
Anyway, thanks again. Nice hearing back from you.
- Richard
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:27 AM
Perhaps, it's the same situation with multiorgasmic performance just as with circumcision. If a man is circumcised from his very first days, if his parents, children, friends and all whom he knows are circumcised, why would he wish to have the penis uncircumcised -- if he doesn't know what is the penis intact? On my opinion, all people -- boys and girls -- are born with multiorgasmic capacity. Just as all people are born with ability to swim -- right from the mother's womb. They swam almost for 9 months in womb's liquid. So, ability not to drawn in the water as long as he or she wants and needs is very multiorgasmic and developed in the womb. In further years of our lives we can exercise that ability to the real high art, or maintain it from time to time as we like, or forget and damp it. The same is with multiorgasmic capacity. What do we expect if for almost 12-18 first years of his life -- the most crucial at his sexual development -- a boy is forced to spend as an asexual being and all his sexual impulses and masturbatory experience are blamed, condemned, forbidden and pictured as bad as "vampiric" and "sinful"?.. For sure a boy cannot be isolated from his sexual nature, but what examples for imitation are kept for him in mass culture and media?.. For sure, wild, violent, lustful -- but not multiorgasmic. Even, macho's nature seems to imply that a male man shouldn't have refractory period. But multiorgasmic awakening and training are absolutely kept off.
So, once again and for the last time (to be sure that I understand you correctly) -- you insist that you never and NEVER in you life experience refractory period after orgasm and ejaculation? So, you can just guess what MRP for a male potency is but you never really feel it on your own experience, aren't you?.. If so, how do you know what is MRP for a man?..
What did you do with you sperm after ejaculation? Did you just wash or wipe it out?.. Or did you use it as a lubricant for further thrusts, especially in a woman?.. Did you ever try to churn it with your still erected phallus up to dry and did you succeed?..
Did you communicate ever with your parents and especially with your father, grandfather, uncle, or brother about your multiorgasmic potential or any sort of sexual experience when you were a child or a teen?.. Were they multiorgasmic too? How do you know?
Every your ejaculation while you were multiorgasmizing was similar to this one? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
I mean, each or your orgasms is consisted of 10 to 15 contractions, and "initial contractions occur at an average interval of 0.6 seconds with an increasing increment of 0.1 seconds per contraction"?
And each of your ejaculation includes 5-7-10 spurts of semen, "followed by an average of 10 more contractions with no semen expelled"?
Did you semen exuded from the penis, or was "propelled from a matter of some inches to a foot or two"?..
Do you have the time sequence for your second documented at Rutgers's research multiorgasmic record (11 orgasms at home)?
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:54 PM
Hi Yaroslav,
On the plus side of the argument, you could be correct that all are born without any sexual limitations and are at least potentially multiorgasmic. After all Alfred Kinsey (the only sex researcher to ever do so) claimed to document multiple orgasms in male infants and toddlers. This would seem, therefore, to indicate that perhaps MRP is triggered somehow in later years, possibly in adolescence. Of course, as no further studies are apparently being permitted… we’ll never know, will we?
And I fully agree that it is very telling that child sexuality is completely repressed in Western society such that it is not even acknowledged as existing despite the fact that both males and females have been seen in the womb masturbating and experiencing orgasms as fetuses. Yet once born… they are NOT permitted sexual expression. Perhaps… as with me… had they been, they might have been raised orgasmically potentiated such that with the advent of puberty, no MRP could take place. It is something I have often wondered given my own experience of being just as multiorgasmic at age 4 as I am now. Now, all of that was just me, by myself; had adults been involved, this might have been psychologically or emotionally harmful, I don’t know.
Once again and for the last time… no, I NEVER have in my life experienced what seems to be the stereotypical MRP others experience. And you are correct, I was shocked to learn through reading sex instructional books as a pre-adolescent that this was how men were “supposed” to be after orgasm. It was what started me on my journey to find a sex researcher who would document this! I simply couldn’t believe that this was how all other men (that’s how the books put it, that this is “physiologically impossible” for men to experience!) were in sex!
Yes… as an adult and after they became aware of the study (they were NOT happy that I had done the study), I asked them and they said they were not at all as I am. However… an interesting caveat… my great grandfather was ostracized by the family such that his wife divorced him and half of his children deliberately changed their last name so as to never be associated with him. The other half kept his name… and we have never heard from any of them again. No one will talk about him. Prior to my uncle’s death, he revealed to me in private that he never learned what it was that had been so terrible, but stated that from what he had heard from his parents and grandparents on the other side… there was something sexually unique about him. Might this have been the “dark gift” so shunned and hated down through history? Who knows? We don’t know anything further about him. We don’t know his birthdate or even when/where he died.
I’m boarding a plane now… so I’ll answer more of your letter, later.
Cheers!
Richard
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:22 PM
It seems that you are right about your great grandfather. It was his insatiable temper that eventually enraged his wife, especially when she became older. If he were an adulterer he would be openly condemn on this basis. But because the gossips amongst his adult grandchildren were that he was as a male man unique they were just ashamed that he was superior at that field and maybe proud somewhere in their souls very deep. Perhaps, just to be multiorgasmic is not enough to awake and to breed woman's sexuality. Maybe both sexes are too lacking for the culture of everyday treatment of male multiorgasmic capacity.
"this might have been psychologically or emotionally harmful"... It should be a huge tragedy for adults too that they are unable to help their children to nourish and master multiorgasmic nature because they are deprived of those basic knowledge by themselves from their own early years too. Besides, about Kinsey you perchance had heard how did he get the most of his priceless information about sexual responses of children. In the film Kinsey that moment in his life was reconstructed to some extent.
How did you find out at 4 y.o. that you are multiorgasmic? How did you use your gift then? Were you absolutely alone with your discovery?..
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:51 PM
Yes, I am very familiar with how and where and from whom Kinsey got his child multiple orgasm data. For obvious reasons, the subject of child sexuality is a controversial one for many reasons. I do agree that it is unfortunate our culture is so sex-negative and also so unloving, uncaring and selfish that… unlike in many ancient cultures… children cannot be safe in a sex-friendly environment with adults. But, that’s a whole different topic. As for how I found out at age four I was multiorgasmic… well, because I was masturbating from that age and was having them. Been that way ever since.
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:02 PM
"unlike in many ancient cultures… children cannot be safe in a sex-friendly environment with adults" That's it!.. Yeah, it's a huge and different topic.
So, returning to the rabbits in a basket:
If you never really feel MRP on your own experience, how do you know what is MRP for a man?..
What did you do with you sperm after ejaculation? Did you just wash or wipe it out?.. Or did you use it as a lubricant for further thrusts, especially in a woman?.. Did you ever try to churn it with your still erected phallus up to dry and did you succeed?.. I was very amazed when found that the milking sperm at some peaks of multiorgasmizing can be churn to dry and absorbed back by phallus and it turns in something different than it was as the seminal fluids before.
Every your ejaculation while you were multiorgasmizing was similar to this one? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
I mean, each or your orgasms is consisted of 10 to 15 contractions, and "initial contractions occur at an average interval of 0.6 seconds with an increasing increment of 0.1 seconds per contraction"?
And each of your ejaculation includes 5-7-10 spurts of semen, "followed by an average of 10 more contractions with no semen expelled"?Did you semen exuded from the penis, or was "propelled from a matter of some inches to a foot or two"?..
Do you have the time sequence for your second documented at Rutgers's research multiorgasmic record (11 orgasms at home)?
How much you were able to play with yourself when you were a child and how did you manage to hide your experience from adults?.. Do you remember your pre-adolescent multiorgasmic feelings?.. It was one continuous contraction or every time it was a serial of involuntary following each other contractions? In what part of your body? And where did it start over and over?..
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:16 PM
Rabbits in a basket? I’m not sure what that means… but, no matter.
I learned what MRP is by reading about it, as I stated. You’ve never experienced a woman’s monthly menstrual period, yet you know what it is and how to describe it by what you’ve read and by talking to women who experience it.
Regarding the semen after ejaculation, I don’t know what you are asking here. Are you asking what I did with the semen after ejaculation during the study or during any sexual experience? And what you describe as “churn”-ing “to dry and absorbed back” into the penis is not at all what I experience. My ejaculations occur just as any man’s… out the end of the penis, sometimes shooting several inches and sometimes not… but always ejaculated outside the penis. Is that what you are asking?
My ejaculation every time is characterized by contractions approximately every 0.8 seconds for about the number you state (10-15), yes. I provided the time sequence for the study, but I don’t recall what it was, now. I’d have to try to find it and reply later.
And, yes, my preadolescent orgasms where by physical friction usually accomplished by rubbing against something. The orgasm was the same as I experience now and with the same orgasmic contractions except that my body then didn’t produce semen to ejaculate, of course. I did this in private and when there were no adults around. After several such orgasms, I would enter a natural high or euphoria that made me feel fuzzy headed and very very good. This lasted about a half hour or so, just as it does today.
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:57 PM
Rabbits in a basket... Hm... I called so -- because it sounds good -- mysteries about MRP.
Do you mean that the strength of orgasm, considering also its continuous summation, was the same as you were a child, teenager, and adult?..
Well, as I understand, after ejaculation you usually simply wash or wipe the ejaculated semen away as waste by-product. Are you sure this way of treating the semen is the most healthy and beneficial thing for a woman as well as her man of all?.. I meant, have you ever try -- just for curiosity or for fun -- to use your ejaculated semen (say when you masturbate) as lubricant for further frictions and has it ever been churned to dry by your hot and huge multiorgasmic phallus being totally reabsorbed by the glans penis?.. During this practice the phallus possesses the most of its potency, strength, and erection. The only nuance that for the best results the semen should be milked little by little, because to churn to dry the total volume of 3-10 ml is a too long deal and laborious business. Though eventually everything is shining and sticking up perfectly.
Why are you so sure that a man who controls and overcomes his ejaculation doesn't achieve the highest intensity of multiorgasmic experience and that the heights of his pleasure and transformation are at least lesser then yours?.. Doesn't this believe and attitude remind you a sort of religious fanaticism and unsubstantiated prejudice?..
Had any of scientists whom you communicated about your phenomenon mentioned that perhaps you have some kind of genetic alteration?..
What was the maximum length of you erected penis you ever measured?..
Have you ever measured levels of your hormone prolactin (synonyms = lactogenic factor, galactopoietic hormone, mammotrophin), especially after orgasms?..
At what age did you find first grey hair on your head?
What was the longest multiorgasmic session in your life?..
Have you ever been tired after your long-long multiorgasmic session?..
If you have children, did they inherit your gift?..
My deep respect to your friendliness and time,
Yaroslav
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:27 PM
Yes, the experience both as a child and as an adult is the same, including the intensity and the multiorgasmic capacity.
I am still confused by the talk of whether I “was or wipe” the semen away. I guess that, yes, when not with my wife, I do treat it as a “waste by-product” and do not consider semen to be some magical fluid or to possess some other mystical qualities. The notion that it does is not the result of science and is the result of primitive superstition and the religious practices created around that superstition.
Why am I so sure? That is easy to explain: because I am in the unique position to try them out for myself and compare. I have used those techniques and have stopped ejaculation just to see whether or not the pleasure is the same… and it most certainly is not.
Any man or woman can learn to stop the orgasmic contractions that accompany orgasm and that in men cause ejaculation. Women experience these same contractions, too! Yet, try convincing ANY multiorgasmic woman that she will experience more pleasure if she stops these highly pleasurable contractions… and she would probably laugh in your face at such a ridiculous statement. How does less pleasure equal more pleasure?! No multiorgasmic woman would ever learn these techniques that force her to use Kegel muscle contractions to bear down (flex) her PC muscles immediately upon orgasm to stop these contractions because it would also stop their additional pleasure.
The only reason why men do this is because if they don’t use these techniques, they KNOW they will lose their erections and CAN’T continue. And that is why they must invent a belief system that makes these pleasure-robbing techniques seem a good thing. Thus, men must either sacrifice their erections to have a full orgasm… or must sacrifice the pleasures of a full orgasm so as to maintain their erections…. And all because of the Male Refractory Period that science will not investigate.
Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:03 AM
And yes (if this is what you are asking)… after several orgasms, I become drained of semen and when I ejaculate, almost nothing comes out. This happens after about six to eight orgasms… then it’s just a drop or two that comes out. Is that what you meant to ask?
Thursday, October 24, 2013 7:19 AM
What is the nature of your gift, it doesn't matter so much, although to find it out is one of the purposes of the research. What is much more important that your example is the true inspiration in dealing with male orgasm, multiorgasm, sexuality, and ejaculation! Thank you and thank you a lot for being at right time and at right place!.. One of the greatest wonders of male multiorgasmic response is that we know much better how to deal and operate with it rather than what is mechanics and aims of this response. We may guess and have very brave presumptions about all the possibilities and perspectives of the phenomenon but each time its multidimensional reality, revealed knowledge, and acquired nuances of capacities and skills makes the study the only meaningful and precious reward and award for all who make it the way and art of their lives. So pathetically but so sincere!.. So far so good!..
That's it!.. Orgasmic nature of women and men, boys and girls, animals and birds, insects, and microorganisms -- and I would even say -- of trees, planets and universes, and -- of pure spirits and souls -- is the same gigantic world. Although the role of human males regardless of their age is very unique and special in that world. Very unique because for all the world it may be pretty vivifying, satisfying, healing, and creative. The real power and destiny of a human male is in his potential of magic sexuality.
What about the mystique qualities of male semen, that is its close affinity to the affects and factors of so called stem sells. Have you ever thought that a man has so much sperm every morning and day not entirely for impregnating his women?.. And that the real purpose of his billions of spermatozoa and abundant seminal fluid is not to be propelled, wiped, and washed away?.. No matter how much males praise their ejaculate, by itself it is rather a waste by-product and a strong allergen and even poison for women than something else. The good job for a man is to release and free the healing, rejuvenating, and vivifying potential of his semen, first of all for his beloved women. He can do it only through his multiorgasmic capacity and by his own huge and honored phallus. It's like milling grain and baking a bread. For sure, the sort of his food and the pattern of life define the quality of his semen too.
Relax and cool a little bit, my friend. For some reasons you are sometimes too hostile to everything that may be called mystique, magic, religious, and superstitious. Have you forgotten that so called science is just a tiny mimicry to real knowledge?.. Although, as the scientist, I would say that scientific database and approach may turn to be very helpful in studying and understanding of the world too. Just do not become the fan of the science and do not deny unsubstantiated what is aside and beyond. Primitiveness is just a temporal quality of our transient world-view and conscience that prevent us to feel and to see what is behind words and their prepositions.
Well, for sure you have tried a lot of techniques. But did you master them, is another question. For some reasons, those techniques are represented and explained in such a way that greatly complicates their usefulness, easiness, and exercising. Let us take for example Kegel muscles. They do not play any role in multiorgasmizing. Their exercising may be helpful almost solely for the vaginal muscles. So, if we have vaginas and are planning to held nephrite eggs or wooden pencils inside as firm as in a hand we can try it and be lucky in results. But, sorry, no results for multiorgasmizing. The male multiorgasm is more about drawing of orgasmic boiling energy than about holding of ejaculation. We don't need to held and restrict ejaculation. We need to overcome ejaculation when we move on the top of the wave. It's not about inhibition, it's about free play, swim, and fly. That's it. Then we may ejaculate as hard as Niagara waterfall and we wouldn't have refractory period as you do. It seems, that MRP is really about something else than we are used to think and to speculate about. Well, we should get it and we would get it.
For sure, when we squeeze our muscles we wouldn't never get the same pleasure.
It's the same as to dive into the water being dressed into all the clothes ready for Arctic frost. Presumably, not the best suit for a swimming walk. The best swimming suit is to be naked at all. Real multiorgasmic practice teaches us not to restrict ejaculation or contractions but freely and relaxed to ride on the orgasmic waves. I'm not sure that being gifted with no-MRP you were missing something essential else. Just being naturally able to effortlessly keep the top of every orgasmic wave -- as naturally as you are breathing -- you are not noticing that that is the utmost secret of your MultiO way. We are not avoiding contractions -- we are avoiding to miss the peak of a wave. It's like to swim in a very stormy ocean. Have you ever try to swim in a stormy ocean?..And why we are much praising multiorgasmic capacities of women?.. They may be much more limited in the sexual responses than any of men. Not from happy life, of course.
No, I was asking about churning of milked semen to dry. It's like you take a bit of sour cream and churn it to butter. But with a phallus the thing is that eventually all churned semen is absorbed by glans penis (and vaginal wall) until everything is clean and shining and happy as it was never before. During this -- frankly speaking -- almost culinary process the enormously swollen erection reaches the heights ever possible for a man.
======
Please and please, answer the previous questions:
1. Had any of scientists whom you communicated about your phenomenon mentioned that perhaps you have some kind of genetic alteration?..
2. What was the maximum length of you erected penis you ever measured?..
3. Have you ever measured levels of your hormone prolactin (synonyms = lactogenic factor, galactopoietic hormone, mammotrophin), especially after orgasms?..
4. At what age did you find first grey hair on your head?
5. What was the longest multiorgasmic session in your life?..
6. Have you ever been tired after your long-long multiorgasmic session?..
7. If you have children, did they inherit your gift?..
==================
If you decide that I already bored you too much with my questions, just say me it, and I would stop my interrogations. Although, the research by itself would never be stopped.
Thursday, October 24, 2013 7:17 PM
There seems to be a lot here that is dogmatic in nature (i.e., proclaiming beliefs not otherwise in evidence) and, thus, things with which I do not agree and, therefore, cannot provide you much response.
I do appreciate and thank you for the first two sentences of this email. However, beginning with the third sentence and most of the rest, I find it difficult to agree. It seems to be your belief that, as you state, the “real power and destiny of (men) is in his potential for magic sexuality.” To me, this is not so at all. The actual fact is that … due to MRP… men are currently incapable of attaining their true sexual and orgasmic potential and, thus, rather than confronting this and trying to find a way to overcome MRP, instead men have invented the superstition that they are not limited at all… instead, they are “magical.” (?!) And if they believe strongly enough, they can perhaps convince themselves that MRP isn’t a limitation, at all. (?!!)
Notice how women have never needed to “invent” any of this “magic” stuff? That’s because they aren’t limited by anything and don’t need, therefore, to invent beliefs to try to feel better about themselves. And were men likewise as unlimited… neither would they. And that is the entire point of www.multiorgasmic.com... To try to have science and society realize the importance of investigating MRP so as to overcome it and grant men the same unlimited natural sexuality that women have always had.
Friday, October 25, 2013 4:46 AM
It's very pity that you found some questions and statement in my responses a sort of offensive and annoying for your self-esteem and decided to skip my further interrogations. I thought it would be open-hearten and open-minded exchange of ideas and experience for mutual enrichment and understanding of your, mine, and other phenomena of male sexuality, but, perhaps, I wasn't right that you really want to find out answers on your mysteries too. Maybe, you are absolutely satisfied with conceptions that you have created and do not want to ruin your supposition about your supremacy any way. However, supremacy in what?.. Maybe, you have some advantages in having extended orgasms at the start of multiorgasmizing however in further peaks multiorgasmically warmed-up men that are milking, drawing, and churning but controling their ejaculatory response would significantly overcome the intensity of their rare unrestricted orgasmic experience and, for example, the quantity of endorphins produced over 3-5 hours multiorgasmic session wouldn't be different between you and those men.
Or, in other words, let us say, we both have access to the same very stormy ocean. You know that you never ever can be drown in it, and I know that in some circumstances I can be drawn. We both like the nature of the orgasmic cycling, riding, and vulnerability. But what different job do we do in that boiling mixture? You believe that the highest joy and pleasure is just to jump to the wild water and passively dangle in it as a cork or a float. That is all your great business. From my side, I prefer to swim, play, dive, and fly in wild waters as much perfectly as I can.
You think that all your gifts you already acquired and you have nothing to learn any more. I never stop to learn other experiences and develop my own all the life past and ahead.
With best wishes and billions of thanks for your frankly shared experience and time,
Yaroslav.
Friday, October 25, 2013 12:55 PM
?
No, I do not find them offensive or annoying… just as I was not exhibiting hostility toward you in a previous email that you accused me of doing. I just don’t agree with evidences based on beliefs. And, it seems if I don’t agree with your belief system, you have to blame it on me somehow. Thus, you accuse me of being offended and becoming hostile and annoyed. If you must feel that way about me to justify your beliefs, then do what you must. However, my disagreement with you is not based on any of that. I am not at all offended or annoyed and I certainly have not become hostile toward you. The only thing I’ve become, if anything, is a bit frustrated in being unable to have a logical discussion of evidences without your beliefs taking center stage and preventing an intelligent discussion of the facts and of Human history regarding Human sexuality.
What you seem to need is a way to find an examination of MRP unimportant and, instead, to justify continuing to believe that… despite the strong evidences to the contrary… techniques that stop ejaculation are better than what I naturally experience without them. Your true motivation in writing me is now apparent: it’s not my conceptions that are the issue here; I have created no “conceptions” or “suppositions” here. I have no belief system upon which my sexuality is dependent. I am as I am… without beliefs or techniques or philosophy required to be as I am. I have not judged you except to express some frustration in your devotion to beliefs instead of having an open-minded discussion on the actual facts. And when presented with facts that are contrary to your beliefs, it is you who take offense and have become annoyed and a bit hostile. And this latest email below evidences all of this and is all about your conceptions and suppositions in judging and, to some extent, condemning me. And this is exactly what belief systems do: they force their believers to condemn anyone not like them.
Of course, your beliefs are your choice. However, the actual evidences indicate they are not factual, as we have discussed. Multiorgasmic women don’t use such techniques because those techniques would stop half of what orgasm and its pleasures are. I don’t use them for the same reason, because I’ve tried them and found they rob me of half my orgasm, as well. And it’s just that simple. Thus, were your beliefs truly better… then multiorgasmic women would be delighted and thrilled to learn them and use them, too. And yet… they do not. Perhaps you should begin to ask yourself… why that is.
Thank you for your emails. And if you wish to write back, you are welcome to do so, of course. I am not hostile at all to you and am always open to discuss this topic. However, I would appreciate a discussion that focuses on facts … not beliefs.
Friday, October 25, 2013 2:33 PM
Well, I also wish open-minded discussion. But I'm a little bit confused with your reply. According to you, my experience is just a fruit of false imagination and superficial believes, while your experience is truly of scientifically proved facts. Then were do you take a measure to draw a boarding line between facts and believes? Why are you so sure that you experience is better and higher than experience of others? If you try to climb over the mountain with bare hands and fell down in a few first steps, why you then do not trust that other people can do it better than you?..
I do not contest your experience and do not foist off my arguments on you. I'm just arguing. Because open communication is very friendly to researchers.
You have two dogmas. The first one, is that only orgasm with ejaculation is true and that orgasm without ejaculation is not real -- a sort of imagination. Well, it ridiculous, because it was your own experience that at age of four you had your full orgasms not distinguishable from ejaculatory orgasms. So, should we consider that before you started ejaculating all your orgasmic experience was not real, not-factual, and imaginative?.. I do not deny this suggestion. I accept all your truth but say that maybe it's only a part of a true picture and try to figure out missing pieces.
The second dogma is that the problem with MRP is not in ejaculation, but in MRP by itself. Although, almost all so much respectful scientific data says that almost all men exactly after ejaculation have their MRP. I'm not denying your point of view, nor any other, I am trying to take into consideration all the physiologic complex as well as looking for reasons that lie between these different events -- ejaculation, orgasm, MRP, and others.
And how do you suppose to study MRP without examination of all approaches, conceptions, experiences, and believes?.. You think you would just put on some wires and a clever computer would determine all contra and pro?..
Friday, October 25, 2013 7:27 PM
Richard, please, answer the questions, the research must go on:
1. What was the longest multiorgasmic session in your life?..
2. Have you ever been tired after your long-long multiorgasmic session?..
3. If you have children, did they inherit your gift?.
4. Had any of scientists whom you communicated about your phenomenon mentioned that perhaps you have some kind of genetic alteration?..
5. What was the maximum length of you erected penis you ever measured?..
6. Have you ever measured levels of your hormone prolactin (synonyms = lactogenic factor, galactopoietic hormone, mammotrophin), especially after orgasms?..
7. At what age did you find first grey hair on your head?
Friday, October 25, 2013 9:26 PM
to Barry Komisaruk
Hello Barry!
My name is Yaroslav, I'm majoring in biotechnology, and my research paper in molecular biology for this term will be about inhibition of Male Refractory Period by multiorgasmic men. Would you be so please to answer on my some questions regarding your research "Male Multiple Ejaculatory Orgasms: A Case Study" (1998)?..
In particular, why, on your opinion, was nobody interested to continue to study Research Subject, although the work was widely represented at professional meetings and in media and still have great fame?..
Would you answer me or not, I am saying you a lot of thanks for your helpful book about the science of orgasm and for all your researches that clarify the mysteries of human sexuality.
Friday, October 25, 2013 10:40 PM
I’m glad to hear you wish an open-minded discussion, as well. I hope we can have just that.
Yaroslav, I never said what I did about your experience or your experiences. I spoke of your conclusions regarding sex, in general, and how you judge my experience.
My conclusions regarding orgasm are not dogma (belief-based conclusions) but are basic scientific fact, nothing more. Here’s the scientific proof: Natural male orgasm includes ejaculation. If it didn’t, you wouldn’t need to learn techniques to stop it. Just like eating naturally includes swallowing the food… unless you deliberately choose to spit out the food. Thus, unless you deliberately choose to stop ejaculation, you will ejaculate at orgasm. That is the natural way male orgasm happens. Were this not the natural way orgasm occurs, then you would not need to learn stop ejaculation That is simple logic based on the scientific facts as all men experience it. That, Yaroslav, is not belief or dogma… it is biological fact.
To answer your question of why I wish to study MRP as I do, it is a scientific fact that MRP is what follows ejaculation. Thus without MRP, men could ejaculate all they want (as I do) and never lose their erections or their desire. It’s just that simple.
Friday, October 25, 2013 8:25 PM
I absolutely agree with you and sign under your every word. Really.
Now I deadly need the answers on my questions:
1. What was the longest multiorgasmic session in your life?..
2. Have you ever been tired after your long-long multiorgasmic session?..
3. If you have children, did they inherit your gift?.
4. Had any of scientists whom you communicated about your phenomenon mentioned that perhaps you have some kind of genetic alteration?..
5. What was the maximum length of you erected penis you ever measured?..
6. Have you ever measured levels of your hormone prolactin (synonyms = lactogenic factor, galactopoietic hormone, mammotrophin), especially after orgasms?..
7. At what age did you find first grey hair on your head?
Friday, October 25, 2013 11:55 PM
Yaroslav,
Thank you. And Where are you in the world? Are you in Russia?
I will answer the questions I choose to answer. I have never timed my longest multiorgasmic session, though some of my longer ones lasted over 24 hours… and, yes, depending on my physical condition at the time and the degree of sexual activity, I can certainly tire after such a sexual experience.
I will not answer questions about my children.
The possibility of genetics has never come up with the scientists I spoke with because, being scientists, they would never speculate on what might be the cause without some actual research, first.
And I’m not going to discuss the size of my penis as this is irrelevant to the subject, though it is above the normal size.
No, my prolactin levels have never been measured… though I am very familiar with the one study that claimed a relationship with prolactin and MRP. However in email correspondence with that study’s main author, he admitted that there was no actual connection made in the study between the two… thus, prolactin is not actually a relevant factor.
I find your question regarding grey hair particularly intriguing… and before I answer that question, I wish to first learn why you ask it?
Saturday, October 26, 2013 6:50 AM
Thank you for your reply, Richard!
I'm an American, although I was born and raised in Ukraine. Do you speak Russian? Do you have some ancestors from Slavonic countries? I noticed that you were trying to determine the etymology for some Old Russian words. Besides, we still have the words Upir and Likhyj in live Ukrainian language.
Sorry for my brazen questions that embarrassed you. I am just trying to collect as much information about your phenotype manifestations as possible. I think it's impossible not to be shameless trying to figure out MRP. As for me, whatever answers I get I do not make any prejudices. And if the train of my thoughts may be annoying, it just reflects the active process of searching that is never defined to be terminated and closed.
Especially sorry for the question about children. As well as that you are not intent to tell me what problems you have with your children. You know your problems better than anybody else and wouldn't share them with somebody. Well, I understand that in this research due to objectivity of subjective reasons I would be devoid of some very important pieces of information. And I'm pity that maybe I would be never able this research to complete.
Grey hair if you had it at your forties and earlier may have (or may not have) connections with some of your genetically expressed qualities that enable you to pass through factors of MRP and do not even notice them. So, if you had grey hair when you were young and know some issues on that account, it may be very helpful for the research too.
What sort of porno video and pictures did they provide you during Rutgers research?.. Did you chose the material by yourself?.. Were those materials helpful? And why did not the research team fix or install air conditioning at the room were you collected your samples? It's ridiculous that they didn't bother to provide you the best comfort for your experimenting as they could for the best of their research.
Saturday, October 26, 2013 11:02 AM
Hi Yaroslav,
The term, “likhyj”, in Cyrillic is: Лихый
What does this mean? Thanks!
Saturday, October 26, 2013 2:01 PM
Hi Yaroslav,
I have found what seems a great resource for additional information on the Book of the Prophets translated by “Father Vampire” in 1047 CE and contains the text of his note to Prince Yaroslav (son of Yaroslav, the Great): http://old.stsl.ru/manuscripts/book.php?col=1&manuscript=89. There is an English translation option, but it is incomplete.
I would very much appreciate your assistance in better understanding what this says and what your thoughts are. Thank you in advance for any assistance you could lend!
To further answer your questions, below:
I created the videotape of favorite porn scenes that I used so as to best ensure I would be successful. And your question asking about the air conditioning in the room got me thinking back to that day. I recall after the experiment was over, I exited the room and remember it felt so nice and cool outside the small lab room they had me do the experiment in… but until now, I never realized that if it were cool outside the room, then the air conditioning WAS WORKING, but for some reason the vents must have been turned off INSIDE the room I was in. And that makes it seem deliberate on someone’s part. Additionally, I remember that the day before after flying all day and arriving at the Newark, NJ airport at about midnight, the doctor who picked me up from the airport chose that time of night to visit a bakery, wait for it to open at 2 AM, purchase some bread and then drive me to his house where I could sleep. I didn’t get to sleep until about 3 AM. Four hours later, at 7 AM, we had to be in the lab to begin the study: I got less than four hours sleep after an exhausting day of travel. Again…. Now that I think back on it, it makes me think perhaps if the room was sabotaged, perhaps someone was trying to ensure the study would be a failure. And the “point man” in that would have to have been the one male researcher: Dr. Barry Komisaruk, at whose home I stayed that night.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 11:39 AM
For the first glance, we have the word in active usage of both Russian and Ukrainian languages. Although, spelling and prevailing connotations are slightly different. Meanwhile, origin is the same.
Spelling
• Russian лихой [lihoy] (L is soft)
• Ukrainian лихий [lыhыy] (L is not soft)
• Old Russian лихый [lыhыy] (in textbooks [lihыy] is claimed to be correct, but nobody knows for sure)
To my opinion, Ukrainian is more conservative language than Russian, so it saved more features of Old Russian than modern Russian. However, I enjoy all three, they are very complementary to each other.
This word is adjective. It may play also the role of an adjective noun (the noun that originated from an adjective).
There are two nests of meaning for the word in Russian and Ukrainian. However, the Russian vocabulary is more accented at the first group while the Ukrainian at the second one.
The first one bases on the generalized semantic group• "foolhardy, reckless, rash, imprudent, impulsive, risky".
You may use connotations like as one from this group
• "valiant, intrepid, dashing"
but only as secondary and not separated and independent from the main (parent) generalized meaning.
A [lihoy] man follows after sudden outbursts of his obsessions and totally gives himself to his delusion.
A [lihoy] man is somebody who may be not responsible for his actions, they may be not under his/her control, and so it's better to be always on the alert nearby such a human.
If some group of people is called [lihiye] it's definitely means that they are a sort of racketeers, thugs, gangsters, pirates, and robbers.
At the same time, a [lihoy] man may represent the danger. His danger is potential but not actual. He is not a maniac, a lost case, or a madman, or a damned man.
While a man is [lihoy], under his excessive affect he may be easily devoid of compassion and peace of mind.
So, who knows, maybe that pope (married priest) Upir` Lыhыj was a confessed brigand or somebody who inflicted (?a lot of) violence and losses on other people in his previous life.
At this connotation of devoutness of something very important for human surviving -- devoutness because of sudden circumstances that are superior of our ability to hold out and stand our ground -- the word [lыhыy] goes to its second semantic nest and etymological origins.
The second semantic nest says that [lыhыy] is definitely something bad because it is devoid of wholeness, and integrity, and something essential.Only Ukrainian saved the key word (noun) for this nest:
• лихо [lыho] -- that is time period when due to different forces we are deprived of something essential in material world for our happiness, wholeness, and survival, so it causes suffering, pain, distress, tribulation, and first of all imbalance of our feelings, spirit, and mind.
Adjective [lыhыy] designates then something that produces our [lыho].
[Lыho] doesn't mean ill fate or inevitable destiny. It means the period of suffering that consciously or unconsciously was made to a some living being, and first of all to a human.
Etymology of the word [lыhыy] is connected with the key verb лишать (лишати) [ru. lishat`, ukr. lыshatы] -- to deprive, to rob, to bereave, to strip.
All above isn't a completed picture. To understand the word [lыhыy] further, we should take into consideration two other relative words derived from the key verb: излишек (izlisheck) and лихва (lihva).
The first means the excess (surplus) of some goods (and secondary -- qualities). We really don't need this surplus for our survival, we just get something that other people are deprived. We just took some goods from somebody making it his/her loses and our surplus, and now we can trade it.
The second means the profit (return) on capital or originally -- usurious interest, literally it's the profit of somebody's [lыho]. Practically, it's a sort of robbery.
U-uf!..
Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:40 AM
Now about your grey hair. It's genetics. It doesn't mean that mutations are harmful. It's just the way you are. But I need more information. At what age did you first notice grey hair? Were they single hairs first or tufts? Do you know somebody among your relatives who also have early grey hair?..
One of co-authors of Rutgers Research was Brent R. Myers -- "Freelance writer, has researched the subject of male multiorgasmic response for several years and has previously published on the subject in the popular press." Have you ever spoke to him and/or what his articles/books do you know? Do you know about him anything?..
The next question may be extremely unpleasant to you. But it is extremely important for all research, because different mechanism are involved. What answer I would get it will be classified. I just know in what direction I should lead my searches. You would significantly help my search if you sincerely answer just as it is. Sorry once again for the question. So, do you have any of your own biological children? Aren't you infertile?..
Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:43 PM
Thank you for this in-depth explanation of this adjective as relates to modern Russian/Ukrainian language. I say modern because, as you know, words and adjectives change meaning and context over time… especially over several centuries. And in this case in particular, this adjective’s actual meaning is not known because this adjective, as written has not been in usage for several centuries.
Therefore, I did some searching and found at least two instances where this specific adjective is found in use in the 12th Century CE, only about 100 years after its usage in the “Father Vampire” afterword in 1047 CE.
ЦЕРКОВНЫЙ УСТАВ ВЕЛИКОГО КНЯЗЯ ЯРОСЛАВА
Аще мужь оженится иною жоною, с старою не роспустився, мужь той митрополиту у вине, а молодую в дом церковный, а с старою жити. Аще же не лихый недуг болит: или слепота, или долгая болезнь, — про тое не пупустити; такоже и жене нелзе пустити мужа.
As best I can translate, the meaning here is one of “never-ending” or “intractable,” which is the characteristic of the illness that makes divorce in such a case acceptable.
What is your view?
Sunday, October 27, 2013 5:15 PM
I will answer most of these questions… but I will expect explanations for the questions you have asked, as they are obviously important to you for some reason. I had my first grey hair when I was 21. It was a single grey hair near the front and top of my head. By the time I was 25, I had a sizable tuft of grey hair in the same place. From there within a very short period of time (3-5 years), my hair was quite salt-and-pepper and almost completely white in the front. By age 35 or so, I was pretty grey all over. And yes, I had an uncle who had white hair by his early-to-mid 30s, as well. I have a full head of hair. I am quite fertile and have biological children (plural).
So how does this help you?
Sunday, October 27, 2013 6:51 PM
My explanation was from historical, etymological, grammatical, lexical, and practical (modern) points of my view. For sure, I don't insist that you should accept them. As for me, you can interpret the word as much as you like.
As I wrote you, according to my knowledge, this adjective was in active usage in both languages for all centuries as well as it is now, but now preferable connotations in both languages are a little bit different though they based at the same root.
The only meaning of the word at that fragment we can get from the chain of meanings, the next level is deeper than previous: evil --> severe --> something that makes a person to suffer. “Never-ending” or “intractable” are very subjective and absolutely not accurate. It the same as you call a rabbit as a pot with carrots. Maybe, a rabbit likes a carrot, but it doesn't mean that he is a carrot pot.
Аще мужь оженится иною жоною, с старою не роспустився, мужь той митрополиту у вине, а молодую в дом церковный, а с старою жити. Аще же не лихый недуг болит: или слепота, или долгая болезнь, — про тое не пупустити; такоже и жене нелзе пустити мужа.
Translation:
If the husband had married another wife, and he did not divorce his old wife, that husband pays the fine to Metropolitan fin, and his young wife goes to a monastery, and he has to live with his old wife. If severe ailment hurts: or blindness, or long illness, then such a woman can't be divorced, as well as it is impossible for a wife to leave such husband.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:15 PM
Thank you for the translation. I don’t seek inaccurate translations; I seek the truth. It stands to reason that Father Upir Likhyj would not have described himself, and in fact named himself, having it appear that he were an evil person or someone who like to make people suffer. To do so would have been to accuse himself of being evil. And as an orthodox Christian priest, he call himself “evil” would have endangered his position with the Church and with Prince Vladimir, son of Yaroslav the Great. It also could have had him accused of being a heretic. It makes no sense that he would have called himself this. Thus… if this is true, the term “likhyj” must have meant something that didn’t mean “evil.” Now, it could have meant something like “severe” (which isn’t specifically evil) or perhaps “extreme” or “excessive,” as I found this term translated here:
Лихый (Likhyj)
Перевод: лишний, 2. чрезвычайный, чрезмерный, превосходный, 3. лишенный, 4. печальный, злой, дурной
[Translation: once, 2. extreme, excessive, excellent, 3. devoid of, free, 4. sad, bad, bad]
(http://orthodic.org/word/6706)
Now, it is obvious that terms like “extreme” or “excessive” are very subjective. What one person thinks is “excessive”, another person might think is not enough… just like with sex. For some men, two or three orgasms is “extreme” or “excessive” while for another, that is way too few orgasms.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:39 PM
Grey hair. At age 21... From one hand, you genetically inherited disposition to early grey hair. From the other, some events in your life or some excessive practice might trigger the display of that disposition. Some sort of hormonal dysfunction, deficiency in melanin production, and your absence of factors that produce MRP or your insensibility to these factors may have connections.
I took notice of your spermiogram from the Research. Very low sperm motility, basic pH, and very high fructose puzzled me a lot. Well I may explain low motility by many previous ejaculations, basic pH by some inflammation due to the same practice. But how should we understand 15-fold levels of fructose?..
Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:43 PM
Where did you find that data? It’s not on the website.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:49 PM
The meaning "evil" is very superficial for лыхый. I prefer to look into origins of the meaning.
Well, whatever who says, I like your research about vampires, because it helps to turn human attention from bloody and destructive things to creative sexuality. That's why I accept your even the most brave suggestions by both hand, legs, and something else
Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:52 PM
"Where did you find that data? It’s not on the website."
I have the original Journal
Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:55 PM
How did you get a copy?! I don’t even know where to get a copy.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:55 PM
Thank you very much; it is rare I am contacted by anyone who appreciates the conclusions I’ve uncovered. And the fact that you do makes me curious as to yourself. What are your interests in this topic beyond the techniques you practice? It is obvious this is very important to you, too.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 8:22 PM
Really, I do not practice any of techniques. I'm just a bird who is pecking the most delicious cherries from the other's cakes.
My main interests are bio-programming and altered stated of consciousness.
Wow, it was a mistake in translation, just delete the odd red word:
If the husband had married another wife, and he did not divorce his old wife, that husband pays the fine to Metropolitan fin, and his young wife goes to a monastery, and he has to live with his old wife. If severe ailment hurts: or blindness, or long illness, then such a woman can't be divorced, as well as it is impossible for a wife to leave such husband.
And can you provide me other statistic materials that were collected during Rutgers Research but were not published?
Sunday, October 27, 2013 8:39 PM
I think I understand, thank you. Are you a researcher, yourself?
Thanks for the correction in the translation. Yours matches the translation I had done for this, except instead of “severe,” the word provided was “excessive” (as with a disease or illness that is permanent or… long-lasting/intractable). And if “upir” does mean “one who feasts” (feaster), then an “excessive feaster” indicates someone who possesses an insatiable hunger… someone who can’t be satisfied. And as this man was a priest (though priests were permitted to be sexually active and have wives), he might not have wanted to name himself something that was so openly sexual… so he used the term “feaster” to describe how he experiences sex.
As you know, this has Christian precedent in the Agape (love feast) in which sexuality was quite openly expressed and experienced, which was why it was banned. This scholar priest would most certainly have known all about this… perhaps more so than we do today given the texts available then that have been lost since that time.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:51 PM
It's not so easy with the word Оупирь too. One of the hypothesis may be that it does not originate from the word пiръ (feast). It does originate from the verb пирять (пырять, пиряти) -- apply shallow, quick and sudden penetration into the victim's body with a sharp hard object, causing the blood to go out. Literally, оупырь is that who оу = (makes or is located by) + пырь = (bleeding opening).
Well, if we take the theory that Оупирь Лихый (Упырь Лыхый) was really a Swedish carver Upir Ofeigr (Epir Ofeg), then etymology will be very different = Loudmouth Not-timid.
So, would you send additional unpublished materials of your MultiO research?.. Not be shame to give them to me, because nobody else but me would interested and motivated to study them carefully. You remember that only to one unknown man who provided Kinsey with all his diaries all the world knows now that children are not absolutely asexual beings and that multio is real amongst the Human male. Let the truth about male MultiO to shine brightly!
Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:05 PM
I don’t know as I can accept that given the many instances where the Slavic (maybe not Russian) verb “pir” is found to be synonymous with “to feast” such as I am told are indicated in certain Slavic legends (pir, pirshestvo and pirovat) where such legends do not indicate blood drinking or penetration into a victim’s body.
I’m afraid I have no unpublished materials as I did not have access to the data collected. I wish I could have more research conducted so as to obtain more data. And yes, I am very familiar with that “unknown” man, a “pedophile,” as he would be called today. And I agree… male multiorgasmic capacity should indeed shine so that men and women could finally approach one another as true equals in ALL ways.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:14 PM
I am familiar with the theory that “Upir” was perhaps a Swede named “Opir.” However, this theory is extremely circumstantial and without any other connection. Upir was a priest and a scholar. Opir gives no indication of being either. Further… if Upir somehow refers to penetrating or shallowly stabbing a victim’s body, we are again confronted with the impossibility of this being the actual meaning as no priest in good-standing, and certainly not one as well known as to personally write an afterword dedicated to Prince Vladimir, himself, would portray himself as someone evil enough to stab victims and drink blood by implication… and to do both to “excess.” This would have had him severely punished, if not imprisoned for heresy, and most certainly excommunicated.
It is obvious this priest, in the manner he addresses the Prince and commands him at the end NOT to forget him, implies a rather close relationship such that he can, in effect, command the Prince in this manner and this not be seen as impertinent and worthy of punishment.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:26 PM
… and one last observation: If “Upir” really means “Opir,” which was the name of the Swede, then there would not have been an adjective AFTER the name. The term must have been a noun that was like a title or a nickname that is modified by the adjective that follows it, not an actual personal name.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:47 PM
Well, then take into consideration that the Old Russian word пиръ originates from the verb пити (to drink), and the word оупирь is very close semantically with the noun оупийца (оупивец) or drinker, old soak. It was point of honor for court priests to be able to drink wine a lot and to remain as a joyful companion. I think knights who make many feasts appreciate such a company of merry Упирь Лихой -- such a super Elbow-Bender. So, he stressed out that he is a good comrade at feasts to be invited and to have good food and drink again. He was hungry rather for common food than for something else.
"then there would not have been an adjective AFTER the name" I don't understand what do you mean. It's a normal Russian pattern for the old ages -- name and adjective nick-name, just as Vladimir the Great (Владимир Великий), Yaroslav the Wise (Ярослав Мудрый), Ivan the Terrible (Иван Грозный).
Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:52 PM
And besides, you promised me to provide statistics on your second session for Rutgers Research. They mentioned only that you had 11 orgasms in 50 and something minutes, but didn't provide any chronology of those orgasms.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 11:09 PM
Where some emperors or kings/queens are concerned, you do have occasions when superlative adjectives follow (e.g., Ivan the Terrible, Catherin the Great). However, you don’t find this with ordinary people or priests. Further, if “likhyj” means excessive, then this accompanies a noun.. not a name. “Excessive worker” or “excessive feaster” or even “excessive complainer” makes sense. However, Excessive Ivan or Excessive John makes little sense as it leaves unanswered the question: excessive what? Thus, it seems to make far more sense that this is a noun being used as a nickname to which the adjective, “excessive” applies, and not a proper name.
As regards the statistics for the second multiorgasmic session I did at home, I was only asked to begin, count the number of orgasms and the time it took and measure the semen obtained. This is what I did, which results are found in the study you have. I have no additional information other than that in the study.
Monday, October 28, 2013 0:09 AM
See attachment.
Monday, October 28, 2013 0:55 AM
“Слава Тебе, Господи, Царю небесный, яко сподоби мя написати книги си ис кирило(ви)це князю Владимиру, Новегороде княжящю, сынови Ярославлю болшему. Почах же е писати в лето 6555 (1047 г.), месяца мая 14, а кончах того же лета, месяца ноября в 19, аз, поп Упир Лихый. Темь же молю все прочитати пророчество се. Велика бо чюдеса написаша нам сии пророци в сих книгах. Здоров же, княже, буди, в век живи, но обаче писавшаго не забывай!”
Monday, October 28, 2013 1:01 AM
Where did you find this .jpg? As this is a bit different from what I have found, and as the word “Upir” is different in your version, which one is the original? How do you know which one is?
Monday, October 28, 2013 1:06 AM
And here is the translation I had done on this:
"Glory unto Thee Lord, Heavenly Tsar, that you enabled me to write this book from the Cyrillic for Prince Vladimir, of the Novgorod principality, son of Yaroslav the Great. I began to write in the year 6555 (1047 CE), on the 14th of May, and finished the same year, November 19th, I, Father Upir' Likhyj. With this I pray that all will read this prophecy. For great are the marvels written down for us by the prophets in these books. Be healthy, o prince, live forever, but of the one writing this do not forget!"
Monday, October 28, 2013 2:02 PM
That passage is from this edition:
http://dgve.csu.ru/bibl/Stolyarova_2000.shtml
see page 3
you need djvu reader to open that file
Monday, October 28, 2013 2:07 PM
Where was Brent R. Myers published? Do you have any of his prints? Is it possible to email with him?
How is it possible to explain extra high levels of fructose in your ejaculate? Do you have diabetes?
Monday, October 28, 2013 8:26 PM
To my recollection, he published in a magazine that no longer exists, called “Pleasure Quest,” an article entitled “Beyond the Myth” and was an article exploring potentials for natural male multiorgasmic response “beyond the myth” of such being considered impossible. I don’t know if he has published anything else beyond this and I am no longer in touch with him.
As regards the high levels of fructose, I was unaware of any such being present and am absolutely NOT diabetic.
Monday, October 28, 2013 8:38 PM
Thank you very much for this! How I wish I could read it. J
Monday, October 28, 2013 9:37 PM
What is the name of this specific book? And does it discuss this 1047 CE vampire reference?
Thanks!
Monday, October 28, 2013 9:50 PM
From what I can find, the English translation of the book is:
“Stolyarov 2000 - carpenter L. Arch records of scribes, artists and bookbinders ancient parchment codes XI-XIV centuries”
A question: How accurate is the English translation I provided below of this 1047 CE marginalia?
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:54 AM
The correct title in English is:
Stolyarova L.V. Code of records of scribes, painters, and binders of Old Russian parchment codices of XI-XIV centuries. - Moscow: Nauka, 2000. 543 pp., ill. - ISBN 5-02-009049-2
Столярова Л .В. Свод записей писцов, художников и переплетчиков древнерусских пергаменных кодексов XI-XIV вв. – М.: Наука, 2000. 543 с, ил. – ISBN 5-02-009049-2
It was published only in Russian, so if you would cite the title in English, nobody would never find it nowhere.
This is professional page of the author:
http://www.hse.ru/org/persons/204964
In Google translation:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.hse.ru/org/persons/204964
Her first name is Lubov' (literally Love), second name is Stolyarova (literally: a daughter of carpenter), and email is at her page.
From the book Code of records... you need just a page that discusses the personality of your Upir. Basically, everything what is said you already know. The most precious for you is the original transcription of that phrase that you like to quote (previously I've sent it to you in jpg). I would check and correct you translation latter.
If you would communicate Lubov', ask her where is it possible to find the mentioned in her book article:
Поппэ. “Ис курилоцЪ” и “куриловицЪ”. С. 326-350
In this article Polish historian Andrzej Poppe discusses origins of Upir L. Stolyarova mentioned this work several times but never gave a clue where that article was published. Maybe, she would be pleased to provide you with a copy of that article or with reference where you really may borrow that article. So, then we would read it both.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:09 AM
It's unbelievable that you were going to that Rutgers Research for almost 20 years!.. And then they spent just 2 hours to study all of your phenomenon and to forget about it forever...
Did Rutgers researchers discuss with you the results of your spermiogram?.. Did they privately a sort of recommend you to lead a regular life in more partial load mode?..
Did you ever write down some interesting occurrences, events, and records of your multiorgasmic experience? For all those 30 years you were just waiting? Did you never document for future scientists nothing observable?..
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:29 AM
Thank you… and yes, it is unbelievable. But… at least an initial study was conducted that proved this “impossible” capacity does exist. No more could scientists continue to call me a “liar and a braggart” as they did before the study. The Rutgers researchers made no recommendations or attempt to discuss anything with me. And they never discussed the spermiogram with me, either. I never really wrote anything down because this is how I experience sex always. Thus, I guess it never seemed important. I am as I am, and as my wife also knows me to be.
I’ve slowed down now that I am older… probably because sex with the same person over decades does tend to be a bit … well… boring, I guess. But my capacity has not diminished. I’m sure were I with a younger woman/women, I would be the same as I was in my 20s and 30s.
And thank you for the email address of Ms. Stolyarova.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:29 AM
Who did call you a “liar and a braggart” and why?
How did you prove Rutgers Researches in advance that your ability is real, so that they got a grant on you, appointed the lab day and paid all your travel expenses? Why did they trust you?
You told that you found out your gift at age of four? How it happened that you were able to make that discovery? Did somebody help you?
Have you read this book?
http://www.amazon.com/Sex-Dawn-Stray-Modern-Relationships/dp/0061707813
It's far to be ideal, but its topic for many men brought a catharsis.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:29 AM
I was called a liar and a braggart by the Kinsey Institute and Masters & Johnson, to name only a couple. Dr. Whipple trusted me after speaking with me and then speaking privately with my wife (she had a lay-over in our area from a plane flight and met my wife at a hotel restaurant where they had lunch, just the two of them. That’s what convinced her to get funding for the initial study.
At age four, I just accidentally discovered masturbation; no one “helped” me.
Thanks for the book suggestion; it seems a great book. I also believe that when marriage began to occur, polygyny was far more common than monogamy, as also were educational intimate relationships between adults and children in this area. It was all far more loving and intimate, without the violence and destructiveness we see all around us today as a result of the lack of such interconnection between people. And, of course, it’s just getting worse and worse.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:32 PM
Frankly, the last thing that I would expected from the Kinsey Institute was that they called you a liar. Do you remember circumstances how it happened? Or maybe you have such a letter from that institute?
So, it was Mr. Whipple who made the decision... For some reasons after the research she absolutely satiated her curiosity and no more returned to similar researches again. Why did she?..
What were your dreams when you had your extended multio-sessions when you were a boy and a teen?.. Were there any that you were captured by a sort of women-pirates or Amazons or female-aliens and was turned into a sex slave?..
How did you wife make peace with the knowledge that you had to masturbate by yourself a lot and that you was masturbating at least no less than was having sex? Did she accepted it as your natural and essential practice and exercise?..
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 7:47 PM
Now the translation. I tried to make it as close to the original and as simple as possible.
Your version
Glory unto Thee Lord, Heavenly Tsar, that you enabled me to write this book from the Cyrillic for Prince Vladimir, of the Novgorod principality, son of Yaroslav the Great. I began to write in the year 6555 (1047 CE), on the 14th of May, and finished the same year, November 19th, I, Father Upir' Likhyj. With this I pray that all will read this prophecy. For great are the marvels written down for us by the prophets in these books. Be healthy, o prince, live forever, but of the one writing this do not forget!
My version
Glory to you, lord, heavenly tzar, as you turned me to write these books in Cyrillic to Prince Volodimir, who reigns in Novgorod, -- to the son of Yaroslav Large, -- began to write it in the year 6555, month May 14, and finished in the same year, month December 19, me, a pope Upыr' Lihыy. As well beg to read the prophecy this. As great miracles these prophets wrote us in these books. Be healthy, duke, live up to a century, tho meanwhile do not forget and the one who was writing.
Version in modern Russian
Слава тебе, господи, царю небесный, поскольку сподобил меня написать книги эти кириллицей князю Володимиру, который княжит в Новгороде, сыну Ярослава Большого, начал же писать это в году 6555, месяца мая 14, а закончил в том же году, месяца декабря 19, я, поп Упырь Лихый. Тем же молю всех прочитать пророчество это. Великие потому что чудеса написали нам эти пророки в этих книгах. Здоров же, князь, будь, в век живи, но меж тем и писавшего не забывай.
P.S. You can find your passage at the page number 3 (in the printed book page 11) of Stolyarova's book. There are author's comments at pages 4 and 5.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 7:55 PM
You ask great questions, Yaroslav.
I sent a letter (this was back before the days of Internet and email) to Masters and Johnson who sent back a reply email questioning the veracity of my claim and requesting I seek psychological counseling in claiming what was clearly impossible. I then called and spoke to someone at Masters & Johnson who refused to connect me with the person who had penned the letter and it was he who called me “a liar and a braggart.” Today, I don’t recall who either person was.
After several weeks, I sent a similar letter to the Kinsey Institute. Their reply was to only send back a copy of a page from a Masters & Johnson book (I think it was from “On Human Loving”) where they had highlighted in red a passage that stated that natural male multiple orgasms were “…physiologically impossible.” That was their only response; there was no accompanying letter or written note. They just highlighted a page declaring what I claimed to be impossible and sent that back. It was a polite way of calling me a liar. I am sure I still have that letter somewhere.
I then called several universities who had Human Sexuality programs and received rude responses from all of them and all of them calling me a liar. I even had one department head who, after calling me a liar, apparently tried to get me to stop “bragging” by telling me that I didn’t stop having multiple orgasms, I was going to die as men were only permitted to have a certain number of orgasms in their lifetimes before their bodies just wore out. Apparently, that was his way of trying to dissuade me from claiming what he saw as clearly impossible.
My wife once called into the Sally Jesse Raphael Show, which at the time was a popular national radio show before she was on national television for a few years. The topic that day was on how men and women’s sexuality was different… specifically as regards multiple orgasm. My wife called in and rather than be put on the air to discuss her experiences with me, she was asked to speak with the producers by telephone after the show, which she did at length. They stated that they wanted to do an entire show on the subject of actual male multiple orgasm and asked she be patient, that they would be in touch. Sure enough, a few days later they called back and told her they were having an expert in Human Sexuality come in to discuss the topic and she would be called the following day at a particular time. Well, the next day she waited … and waited … and waited. The time they said they would call came and went… and still two hours later, no call. She waited the rest of the day… and no call. The following day, she finally called into the show (they had given her a special number she could call in on) and she spoke to the producer who, unlike the previous time they had spoken, now treated her extremely rudely and with disdain. She was told they didn’t appreciate her attempt to lie to them and they wanted nothing further to do with her… and then hung up on her. My wife was horrified, humiliated and in tears over how they treated her. When I got home from work that day, she told me all that had happened and after consoling her, she became angry at how she had been treated. I told her now she knew how I felt and what I had been going through all these years. And, like me, she became in her own way determined to see them proved wrong!
And this was what I went through year after year after year… with everyone claiming since history began that men can’t be this way… and nothing found to state otherwise… and no one willing to listen or seriously consider the possibility. Those years were very frustrating and very disheartening. I’ve only provided you a few of the humiliations I, especially underwent.
As for my fantasies… hehehe… well of course I had many of them and still do. Not so much being a sex slave… but certainly of having many of my own, though very willing ones, of course (I’m no sadist or rapist). And yes, I my wife has come to understand my nature… because, as fate would have it, she is not like me and has little actual sexual desire. So… it’s been difficult over the many years.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 7:58 PM
Thank you so very much for a transliteral translation of this text!!! Finally, I have what I think now is a word-by-word correct translation!
I do have one question, however: Is not the word “pope” (a pope Upыr' Lihыy) the same “father”?
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:09 PM
A question for you: Who is he addressing in this text? At first, it appears he is addressing God (“Lord, heavenly tzar”)… then near the end, he seems to be addressing someone called “duke.” Who is this “duke”? Is it Prince Vladimir/Volodimir, the son of Yaroslav the Great? Or is this a duke, and someone different?
Thanks!
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:59 PM
Well, you spoke and I felt all your truth. That's very pity that you got such experience with institutes that founded their organizations on the names of Kinsey and Masters. I think, these founders would never miss your case. And why didn't you connect to Americans Hartman and Fithian, or Chia, or Robbins, or Dunn who were actively studied multiorgasmic men in the beginning of 1980th?
Do you remember any of your masturbatory fantasies before you turn into 14 years of old? Or did you masturbate before your puberty without any dreams, just for sport or like as gymnastics? Or these practice was very rare before you started to produce semen?.. Try to recollect your children experience in more details. It seems that a part of your mystery is in early onset of your orgasmic experience. So do not surprise that many other questions will be about that period of your life.
Do you have a copy of threads that you got when the guest-book at your forum was alive? I remember it was a huge guest-book.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:09 PM
Priest and father may be relative synonyms to pope. But Russian orthodox pope is a pope and nobody else. You may call a pope a priest and a father, he would accept and understand, but if Upыr' called himself exactly as a pope and was proud with his title, so why we should call him something else?.. Especially if English has such a word.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:18 PM
Volodimir is the same as Vladimir, I just stressed out the original pronunciation. Lord is God, and duke (in your variant prince) is Volodimir. I choose duke not prince, because Volodimir was the actual ruler of Novgorod region, so he was a duke (or maybe we can find some other similar word). Although, by fact he was also a prince who may claim Kiev after father's death. However, Duke Volodimir is definitely not a Prince Mio.
Besides, wouldn't you be embarrassed if I call you Duke of all Upirs?..
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:19 PM
Thank you… and, of course, I attempted contact with all of them, with the exception of Dunn & Trost as they did not do any actual research, theirs was just a survey done, not an actual study. Mantak Chia was a practitioner and advocate for Tantric techniques, not a scientific researcher. I contacted Hartman & Fithian, whose research resulted in the book “Any Man Can.” When I contacted them, they were no longer doing any research and, again, their research was only in documenting how ejaculatory-control techniques (largely from Tantricism/Taoism) were actually used in practice. They had no knowledge of or interest in the “unlikely” claims of one man.
Yes, I do remember the fantasies I had as a small child and prior to having any knowledge whatsoever of what sex even was. But I would prefer to keep those to myself. However, they were very erotic in their own way.
Unfortunately, everything from the guestbook was lost. If it helps, the majority of it was basically either people asking questions or making claims and trying to schlock their own websites and products/services. I’m surprised you remember the guestbook as it has been gone for at least a couple years!
You’ve told me you are a student in molecular biology, but it is apparent that this subject holds much interest for you. Why is that? What is your interest in learning all this from me?
Thanks again.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:20 PM
So are you saying that Popa Upir… was the head of the entire Catholic Church in Novgorod… or maybe ALL of Russia? He was above the level of “Metropolitan”?
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:25 PM
Thank you for your wonderful clarifications! In English, a Duke indicates the head of a “duchy” or province. And while Volodimir was most certainly in charge of all of the province and city of Novgorod, my understanding is that he was Yaroslav’s eldest son and, thus, his heir and, thus, the Prince, as well, which would have been a higher and more significant title than “Duke.” Additionally, as you may or may not know… it was the custom then for the eldest son to be given autonomous rule over Novgorod, thus again indicating that Volodimir was the chosen heir (Prince) of Yaroslav, the Great. Also, I don’t know if you are aware that only five years after this statement by Popa Upir… Prince Volodimir died of unknown circumstances (the cause of his death is not known) and this was two years before Yaroslav the Great died. This is interesting given Popa Upir’s strange statement that he wished the Prince/Duke “live a century”… but that he not forget Popa Upir, making it seem that Volodimir’s continued life was somewhat conditional upon Volodimir “remembering” Popa Upir, somehow.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 2:11 AM
Oh, no! He was a sort of regular priest in Catholic church. All I wanted to say is that Catholics call Pope the chief or their church. Russians of XI century called their priests popes. It's a pope, not Pope. Russian Metropolitan was the chief of Russian Orthodox church, a sort of Pope in Catholics. A pope was in range lower than a bishop. He was a married priest who had as wife as well as a lot of children. That is why it's better not to confuse Catholic priests with Russian popes. It was exactly the time of East–West Schism. And our Upir' accentuates that he is pope, otherwise that he belongs to Eastern Church.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 2:30 AM
I follow in translation to what our pope wrote and didn't add my contemporary interpretations and interpolations. As for me, the closest word in English to князь is duke, although it's also a translational tradition to call Russian duke a prince. Our pope called Volodimir a duke, and князь means in Russian exactly duke, not prince. If Upir wanted to call Volodimir prince, he would find other words rather than князь.
According to the text, he wished Volodimir to live a hundred years, not eternity. If he knew that Volodimir would die, he would say something else as well. I agree with you that there were many wondrous things in their relations that we do not know. And we can just guess.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:45 AM
Excellent! That was my understanding, as well. And if my theory is correct, it would understandably require that he be very sexually active and that this be entirely acceptable to the Eastern/Russian Church. Thanks so much for this reply! J
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:46 AM
How interesting that he calls him “Duke” and not “Prince.” I wonder if this was intended as a put-down of Volodimir by not recognizing him as the Prince.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:08 PM
I told just about the difference of terms. And that Volodimir was called a duke doesn't mean that he wasn't accepted as a prince. All I wanted to say that a duke may be a prince too or he may not, a prince may be a duke or he may not, and that if a person is a duke it doesn't mean that he is simultaneously a prince as well. Do you catch the difference?.. So, Volodimir was called a duke though he was actually a prince too. Upir' accentuated that Volodimir was an actual ruler not just a son of a ruler, what usually the word prince in Russian means.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:25 PM
I do not know what is wrong with that sexologists. They should be the most progressive and curious people in the world. But happens to be with lots of their own difficulties, complexes, and misunderstandings! Very often they become just servants of some prevailing in society dogma. What may be the global practical use that men are not multiorgasmic?..
"You’ve told me you are a student in molecular biology, but it is apparent that this subject holds much interest for you. Why is that? What is your interest in learning all this from me?"
You think that inhibition of MRP by the multiorgasmic human males is bad topic for a molecular biology student?. Why are you surprised or embarrassed that I ask you about your multiorgasmic experience? For some reasons, many multiorgasmic men are keeping their secrets alone and are not in a mood to share their experience around. I'm interested in your experience of being a multiorgasmic man so don't be shy.
How did you make acquaintances with Brent Mayer? Was he much older than you? How did he test your multiorgasmic nature?.. Was he multiorgasmic too?..
I'm not really asking you about the very nuances of you sexual prepubertal fantasies and what did you do with your imaginary ladies. I'm just interesting how much older than you they were in you fantasies? 1-2 years older, 3-4 years older, 5-6 years older, or significantly older? Or the same age as you? Or younger?.. Were you a prince among them or a welcome guest?..
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 8:55 PM
You answer my question with questions… and then ask more questions. Please just answer my questions… as I have been answering your questions. I have answered most of your questions as honestly and openly as I can. So I am not embarrassed by your questions. I am curious why are you so interested. What do you hope to learn… and why?
I am curious what your reasons are for wanting to know so many details… especially when the details you ask cannot teach you anything about why I am as I am. For example, the questions you ask in this email about what my fantasies were as a young child cannot possibly help you learn why I am as I am. So, what is the real reason you ask these questions?
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:19 PM
Thank you for helping me better understand this. So, as you see it then, by calling him a “Duke” and not a Prince, you think Father Upir was actually complimenting Volodimir by acknowledging him as a current ruler, not just the heir apparent to his father’s throne?
Thanks!
Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:07 AM
I do not hope to be taught by you in your natural multiorgasmic capacity any way because you can't teach what happens for and to you spontaneously by itself and the nature of what you can't understand although have tried. What I'm trying to learn are some features of the way you are, because resolving of molecular mechanisms of you ability is impossible without knowing circumstances of your way of life. I already said that at least some of the reasons of your ability are grown from the early onset of your multiorgasmic activity so I'm wondering what helped you to keep interest in further exercising when you were a child.
It's not just a biological inquiry, it's a wide cultural research of the way multiorgasmic men are in the world, in society, and by themselves as well. Surely, if you write your biography as of a multiorgasmic man it would be a worldwide bestseller. But while it happens, would you please to answer my questions? I'm not going to cite your words or connect your information with your name.
Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:31 AM
I do not know what a pope Upir was thinking about. I explained just what actual meanings were of used words in the text. In this text he couldn't call him other words.
Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:57 AM
I know you do not ask to be taught this natural capacity… because, as you know, I can’t teach what I don’t know how to teach. But I do wish to learn if you think you can perhaps learn what is different about me. That would be very helpful for other men.
As for what kept my interest as a child… I would think that is obvious: the pleasure! The more orgasms I had, the more I wanted. It was just that simple.
Thursday, October 31, 2013 7:20 AM
Thank you for understanding!.. Pleasure... You were lucky that you were able intuitively to find out and develop your sexuality in the right multiorgasmic way. But anyway you -- as majority of others -- were lacking at that path of your developing in real teachers, helpers, and advisers.
But the questions were a little bit different.
Really, the question is not just about you when you were a child. I'm just verifying some of my hypothesis about non-satiated boyish nature whatever age he is -- 7, 16, 20, 40, 99 (if he is able to preserve his original boyish identity). So, please, answer just simple as it was (why you should be ashamed for fantasies that you had 50 years ago, I do not as your imagination since you were an adolescent). Once again, I'm not really asking you about the very nuances of you sexual prepubertal fantasies and what did you do with your imaginary ladies or males. I'm just interesting how much older than you they were in you fantasies? 1-2 years older, 3-4 years older, 5-6 years older, or significantly older? Or the same age as you? Or younger?.. Were you a prince among them or a welcome guest?..
I would explain why I asked this question after you answer me.
Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:48 AM
Real teachers, helpers and advisors? The only such I needed and never had… were others like me to help me understand myself better, to understand our kind and how best to understand and deal with the world around me that was so very alien to me then and still is, in many ways, today.
As a child, I imagined females my own age as well as older girls who had developed. I never imagined actual women (probably because they seemed too much like mothers rather than potential partners). And I recall that I was the dominant person in those fantasies… never anything actually against their will, of course.
So why is it you ask this?
Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:00 PM
It's not, of course, the rule but I noticed that, according to their own recollections from the time they are adults, many boys and pre-teens, especially with awaken orgasmic multipotential, were instinctively longing for intimacy with ideal older women and men who may share their experience and knowledge and whom they may totally trust their thoughts and feelings. These visits might be regular but relatively seldom and wouldn't constituate the main sexual outlet.
Also noticed that preferable partners for such a boy might be girls 3-6 years older or of 14-16 years old as well as of his own age and younger who adore and need his precious male performance and insatiably consume it mainly through shameless touch and oral practice. So, he is a sort of endless kettle with delicious drink and generously measures off his vigor as much as somebody needs.him
Frankly speaking, it seems that fantasies about and needs for wild oral sex are prevailing in life of such a man when he were a child or older or much older -- through all his life.
Also such boys were much habitual for mutual sexual experiments with their own age male friends and might occasionally try everything. Although, the preferable sort of relations would be frankly buddy talks, mutual nudity, self-masturbation in the presence of each other, mutual masturbation, and rarely oral sex.
What do you think about it?..
Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:07 PM
I guess I was different from even that early age in that I never found older women attractive, though in approaching adolescence I certainly adored pubescent girls with their developing womanly curves. J
Now it is true that a large part of my fantasies at that early age were rather oral in nature. And that has always remained a very large part of my most arousing fantasies and desires.
I can also honestly say that I have never, ever, been the slightest interested in a sexual way with males… just absolutely no interest in that way. I have never experimented with other males, never engaged in mutual nudity or masturbation, never had any desire to do so… and growing up, one of my closest friends was quite effeminate and later came out as homosexual. Yet, at no point was there anything between us except simple friendship. I have always adored females, emotionally, romantically and sexually. It’s just how I am “wired.”
Hope that is helpful.
Friday, November 1, 2013 1:26 AM
I think that the great deal between an older woman and a younger MultiO man may be in their mutual although very different attractiveness. Who knows, a woman may be attracted in young male by his youthfulness, let us call it the potential (and if she knows how-to-do) and actual extremely effective energy of revitalization and rejuvenation. For a young knowing man an older and very hungry on him woman may represent very intensive, continuous, and diverse exercising that he would never get in other circumstances.
Although, perhaps, a young man should be really awaken to realize and perceive that. As any boy, he would longing for intimacy with girls rather some years younger than the same age as he. He would be longing just to sit or lie or walk as a prince and just enjoy his power to be ultimately adorned. And the theater of naked beauties, maybe, in high boots and with long whips.
You said you was lack of others like you to help you understand yourself better. Others -- women or males?.. If males, then what sort of communication might be between you from that childish time and another male to help you to know thy better? Conversations about multio nature and experience by the cup of evening tea?..
Friday, November 1, 2013 2:34 AM
Yes, I can certainly see how an older woman might be a great mentor for a young multiorgasmic man. Frankly, and as was the case anciently in many of Earth’s first civilizations (thus, those most likely founded by the multiorgasmic Anunna/Sons of God), I think it is far more important that very young girls be sensually mentored by women (female priestesses, back then) given that all too often even today, females seldom ever realize their sensual capacity even after marriage… by which time it is far too later for so many of them. Thus, were such young girls raised from near infancy in a sensual environment with the assistance of women, they would enter young womanhood fully potentiated in their body’s functioning on all levels, including their own pleasure. Males, on the other hand, tend to find from very early age their sexual “equipment” and, thus, are far more likely to find out on their own about sexual pleasure.
As for why I wish I had had other males like me growing up, this primarily has to do with providing the knowledge of who we are and where we came from… as well as, as I previously stated, how to live in a society where such sexuality as ours is all too often vilified as bad or evil, and how to better deal with such an insatiable capacity that, due to the male sex drive, makes it almost impossible to keep from going almost insane with desire… constantly. It is very difficult to deal with. Had I had a male mentor who could understand all this because he lived it, too… perhaps I would have had a far easier time of dealing with this in my own life.
Friday, November 1, 2013 3:01 PM
When you were a boy, a teen, and later did you somehow play with your anal area during your masturbatory sessions?.. Did you like gently to stroke area between buttocks, including the outside surface of anal sphincter?.. Did you experiment sometimes with insertion of a finger, some vegetable (like a carrot), or a sort of dildo into your anus?.. What were and what are your feelings and thoughts about your own and other male's anal sexuality?.. Did you notice some connections and relations between anal sensuality and arousal, orgasmizing, and ability to get more or less sexual pleasure from the own erected and multiorgasmizing phallus as well?.. And when you were a child was you taught by your parents to wash your anal area after doing number two?.. Or do you still use just toilet paper and wash yourself just when you have your regular shower?..
Was you ever some kind of been raped by a woman? Well, because of your inhibited orgasmic potential really it's hard to call that action a rape, let us call it as somehow forcefully been used as erected and orgasmizing man. If you had such experience, was you really humiliated and shocked by your physiologic performance into which you were involved?.. If you didn't have such experience, had you ever dream about it or a sort of it? And how do you think, could such experience with an insatiable and initiative very strong and tough woman really be psychologically and psychically traumatic for a multiorgasmic human male?..
Friday, November 1, 2013 11:29 PM
No… I’ve never found the anal area or prostate gland massage to be the least helpful or stimulating. And was only taught and still use toilet paper.
I’ll answer the rest, after.
Saturday, November 2, 2013 2:33 AM
I think your questions do more in revealing your own personal attitudes and desires of sexuality than they attempt to discover of my own.
No… no anal fixations or desires… and, no, I have never been “raped” by any woman whether as a child or an adult. Nor have I had sex with dead people or animals, nor have I ever had any weird fetishes or paraphilias. I might surprise you to learn that the first time I ever had sex was with my wife.
Does that help?
Saturday, November 2, 2013 6:19 AM
Yes, sure significantly, thank you!
Saturday, November 2, 2013 3:16 PM
Would you please answer the question using Photoshop?..
In the attachment you find the file Semen as.psd Open it in any version of Photoshop and drag folders 14-15, 20-25, 30-35, 40-45, and now to the proper place at the scale according to your attitude to your ejaculated semen that you had at age approx. 14-15, 20-25, 30-35, 40-45, and now. Example circle marks that the semen is something like the average between urine and saliva with some quality of feces.
If you do not have Photoshop, open Semen as.jpg in any picture editor and using a brush-tool or a pencil-tool put color spots at proper places according to your past and present attitudes to your semen that you produced and produce during orgasmizing.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 1:48 AM
I don’t need to graph out anything to simply explain that I have always thought of semen as a wonderful liquid that ought to be milked/nursed from a man by a woman (or women) constantly and drank down like the elixir of life that it is. Have always felt that way and there are studies that validate this view, as well.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:00 AM
Then did you ever feel, or know, or dream that a multiorgasmic man can be a magnificent and infinitive source of health, vivifying energy, and rejuvenation for a woman, especially when she becomes older and older?.. And that the more he gives the better he is renewed?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:03 AM
I certainly knew first hand the last part of your statement, that the more he orgasms, the more he is renewed… because that is exactly what I always experience. What you state before that makes perfect sense and something I have wondered about for decades. It is what I believe to have been one of the purposes of the original Hieros Gamos Rite / Sacrament of the Bridal Chamber… as experienced anciently when such males were not as rare as they are today.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:07 AM
And are you sure that any ejaculated semen is healthy for a woman?.. Why then it may be so toxic and cancerous and destructive for her body and health?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:16 AM
Scientific research disagrees with you:
http://www.news-medical.net/health/Swallowing-Semen.aspx
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2190863/Semen-good-womens-health-helps-fight-depression.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/05/semen-as-superfood-protein-shake-health-benefits_n_3389375.html
http://www.yourtango.com/experts/professor-kimberly-resnick-anderson/10-health-benefits-semen
This last lists the following benefits of semen to women:
1. Natural anti-depressant.
2. Natural anxiety reducer.
3. Improves quality of sleep.
4. Increases energy
5. Improves concentration
6. Improves memory
7. Improves mental alertness
8. Assists with pregnancy maintenance
9. Increases female-initiated sexual behavior
10. Reduces pain.
Obviously, if the man has a sexually transmitted disease (e.g., HIV), this can be transmitted to the woman through the man’s fluids, including semen. However, semen from a healthy disease-free man… is very healthy and even beneficial to women.
And semen is absolutely NOT carcinogenic (cancer-causing).
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:20 AM
Here’s what semen has in it:
• Fructose
• ascorbic acid
• zinc
• cholesterol
• protein
• calcium
• chlorine
• blood group antigens
• citric acid
• DNA
• Magnesium
• vitamin B12
• phosphorus
• sodium
• potassium
• uric acid
• lactic acid
• nitrogen
• other nutrients
None of this is inherently harmful and almost all of this is very healthy and nutritious. Notice that fructose is found in semen, just as it was in mine, too.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:32 AM
Thank you a lot for these links!
And what's about Paul "Fotie" Photenhauer's books? Do you find his recipes practical? Do you think he is missing something very crucial and important?
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:36 AM
Sounds like just my kind of book! I might have to get it. hehehe I think anyone who promotes semen drinking for females ought to be publicized and popularized as much as possible. Frankly, I think females should be drinking straight from the tap from early age, on. But that’s probably just my own sexual fantasies talking. ;)
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:40 AM
Well, not everything is so smooth:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070509210142.htm
http://www.medindia.net/news/view_news_main.asp?x=13874
http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects
http://www.news-medical.net/health/Semen-Health-Effects.aspx
and so on...
https://www.google.com/#q=semen+cause+cancer
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:46 AM
If you noticed, however, it’s not semen, itself, that causes the problem… but something else, such as HPV in semen (again… a virus) (www.nhs.uk/Livewell/STIs/Pages/oral-sex-and-cancer.aspx) or when cervical cancer is already present (www.mrc.ac.uk/Newspublications/News/MRC002621)
To the specific question: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Does_sperm_cause_cervical_cancer#slide1
The answer is … again… no. Only when the man has HPV that, then, is in the semen is there a problem.
As I stated… if the man is healthy (no diseases), then a woman is not going to contract anything by swallowing semen.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:49 AM
For some reasons, a man, especially multiorgasmic, is so much sure that women should milk and drink him as a cow or a goat. Who knows, maybe he is right. And what about his diet and way of life? Maybe for the best results he should be exclusively organic vegetarian plus good healthy habits like as 8-hours of sleep every day, Chinese gymnastics, swimming, fresh air, multiorgasmic exercising as well... I think, if a cow would eat meat and fish her milk wouldn't be healthy and tasty.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:52 AM
The more I’m “milked,” the more orgasms I have and the more pleasure I receive. And there is something so incredibly erotic to me to have a female swallow me down again and again. If you want to call me a “cow” or a “goat,” that is how you see it… not how I see it.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:54 AM
For sure, semen is not toxic by itself but by some ingredients that are included because a man isn't healthy at his way of life. And then... Do you think it's very nice for a woman to lick and suck man's penis that is dirty and haired? And when it smells of his dirty ass?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:56 AM
And what about that for the best results he should be exclusively organic vegetarian plus good healthy habits like as 8-hours of sleep every day, Chinese gymnastics, swimming, fresh air, multiorgasmic exercising as well... I think, if a cow would eat meat and fish her milk wouldn't be healthy and tasty. And he should shave his genitalia all over and wash his ass after defecation.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:56 AM
Do you think it’s nice for a man to lick and suck a woman who is dirty and hairy or who smells? The answer is just as obvious there as for a man. Why are you asking gross questions with obvious answers?
Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:58 AM
Humans are not cows (why am I still having to point this out to you?)… and obviously a man should be well washed and clean. This is obvious.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:01 AM
Because some man are sure that women should eat all their dirty and stinky places just because they seem from their heights to be delicious.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:04 AM
I am not such a man.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:05 AM
I think that if a man would be a vegetarian and make gymnastics every day he would be much healthier and tastier for his women as well.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:07 AM
Perhaps… though I am too much an omnivore to be a vegetarian. However, drinking pineapple juice really helps to sweeten the taste of semen. And a diet heavy in vegetables really helps, too.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:10 AM
Why it's so difficult sometimes for a multiorgasmic man to make his woman also multiorgasmic and to awake all her sexual potential?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:13 AM
Best question you’ve asked so far! Of course, it helps if the woman has sexual desires to begin with. Kinda hard to awaken something if it isn’t really there to begin with.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:17 AM
Maybe all of these is also a reason why boys from their early years should be taught and brought to be healthy and tasty for themselves as well as for their beloved women. But most of the boys are lacking of this sort of breeding.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:27 AM
Well, it may happen at the beginning of their meeting. But why for all many long years of their married life he may fail to awake her as well? Isn't a multiorgasmic man a torch that inflames by itself all the fire of female sexual hunger, longing, and desire?.. It seems that by all his multiorgasmic nature he should automatically awake all the women he sees and then just satiate and satiate their infinitive thirst.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:32 AM
I’ve found it does require the woman to be as he is for this to occur. For many women, their emotional natures are VERY fulfilled by such men. However, for many women that emotional nature does not translate to an equally deep sexual desire, as well. It is estimated that only 14-20% of females are actually multiorgasmic, despite the fact that all females are capable of being so (there is no physiological limitation/barrier as there is in men). When I meet a woman, I can tell within a half hour of meeting her if she is like me, or not. And all of this without discussing sex, at all. It is simply something you sense.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:48 AM
Do you mean that emotional woman may be satiated by a multiorgasmic man just by the fact of being around him, of seeing and touching him every day without having really any sex relations with him?.. Maybe it's a sort of relations between a mother and her son. Then it's so great and beneficial for such a woman to nourish and exercise his multiorgasmic nature every day not in order of having sex with him but merely to inhale his nature when he is nearby. Maybe so much healthier relations were in families too if a son wouldn't/t be ashamed to be naked and to masturbate multiorgasmically when his mother accidentally would come into his room...
Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:54 AM
Kind of saying that… yes… but without the mother/son scenario you keep trying to paint. For a woman (and multiorgasmically capacitated men), the emotional and spiritual are inexorably linked to the sexual. For women, however, the emotional/spiritual are of primary importance… especially in those who are not capacitated multiorgasmically. This the “vampire” fully can relate to, as well, because of how linked all three are to him, as well. And… yes… I am considered by other women almost as though I were a woman, too. It is a very deep emotional connection I share with them and they with me… such that my wife is never threatened by this, at all. Doesn’t matter how intimate may become our conversations, she has no cause to be insecure.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:02 AM
And do you mean that if a woman isn't multiorgasmically capacitated by her own nature, even the most gifted multiorgasmic man wouldn't be able to awake her multiorgasmic nature, she wouldn't need sexual relations so much as he needs and anyway he has to have sexual relations or beside his family or to masturbate?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:05 AM
Obviously, every situation is unique. If a woman’s lack of desire is based on her lack of emotional fulfillment, then he stands a very good chance! If, however, despite emotional fulfillment she is simply not sexually motivated or is lesbian, then he likely will not.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:18 AM
"she is simply not sexually motivated"
Do you mean that a gifted multiorgasmic man simply by himself can't be the perfect motive for a woman to have sexual relations with him?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:21 AM
No… what I’m saying is that there are women who, due to many reasons, simply have NO libido, period. Thus for such women, a multiorgasmic man can actually be a liability.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:24 AM
I said that perhaps it will be healthy for family relations if a son wouldn't be ashamed to be naked and masturbate in presence of his mother without any dreams to have real sexual relations with her. It seemed that you questioned this mother/son scenario. Why are you skeptic about that?
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:30 AM
It’s not skepticism… it’s just that you are so obviously motivated, if not aroused, at the son/mother sexual thing… if not homosexuality, as well. And that’s fine… however that’s not what I am suggesting or advocating and I’m not sure why you keep bringing that up. I don’t see how masturbating in front of your mother has anything to do with this discussion or how such would be helpful. And, sorry, but if you’re naked and masturbating in front of your mother… then obviously you would be thinking about having some sort of sexual relationship with her, or else why do it?
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:37 AM
I'm not saying that a son specially comes to the room of his mother to masturbate. I said that if a mother accidentally comes to the room of her son when he is naked and masturbates, it will be much better if nobody would be surprised or ashamed, and that the mother would accept such son's performance as natural and essential for him, and that a son would simply continue his exercise even if his mother stays for her own business in his room longer.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:40 AM
And you have a sort of such a case... And if you wife accidentally came into a room where you, for example masturbated, she wouldn't be more surprised, hurt and embarrassed than if you were making your morning exercise or scientific research.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:52 AM
You think that if a man fondles his testicles and perineum during masturbation and wash his ass after defecation then he obviously accentuates his homosexual features?..
Aren't you frighten such open and simple relations between a son and his mother only because you would be jealous and envy if such sort of relations were between your son and your wife?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:01 AM
Nope… didn’t say that.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:01 AM
"And if you wife accidentally came into a room where you, for example masturbated, she wouldn't be more surprised, hurt and embarrassed than if you were making your morning exercise or scientific research."
No… she wouldn’t.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:02 AM
"I'm not saying that a son specially comes to the room of his mother to masturbate. I said that if a mother accidentally comes to the room of her son when he is naked and masturbates, it will be much better better if nobody would be surprised or ashamed, and that the mother would accept such son's performance as natural and essential for him, and that a son would simply continue his exercise even if his mother stays for her own business in his room longer."
I agree that such shouldn’t be a huge issue… anymore than were a father to observe his daughter doing this.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:13 AM
Anymore than were a mother to observe her daughter, or a father to observe his son, or children to observe their parents... What a comfortable and ideal Neverland! Can we find it anywhere on Earth or create it by ourselves?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:15 AM
Agreed, entirely!
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:17 AM
Are you agree about questioning? Or about the obvious answer that we have to make it?
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:23 AM
I agree that such an open attitude of sexuality ought to exist… though until we can first develop a society wherein such openness will not open children up to being abused and exploited, such a society is simply not possible. When we live in a society where any such would have a parent thrown into prison for “child abuse,” … and where, all too often given the evil in society and the terrible attitudes too many men (especially men) have toward women and children, it is best we have the society we do that over-protects childhood. Yet… it is still so sad that this is what society has become.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:27 AM
"the emotional and spiritual are inexorably linked to the sexual. For women, however, the emotional/spiritual are of primary importance… especially in those who are not capacitated multiorgasmically."
It's a very common excuse heard from women and their men. However, this explanation, even if it were the only truth on the planet and sounds so much great and lovely, doesn't resolve the problem of insatiable openness of multiorgasmic men, neither the somnolency of linked to these men women.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:31 AM
You’re right; it doesn’t resolve the issues multiorgasmic men have in forming the sort of marriages and families and society that would be the best for them and for their wives and children. However, we do not live in a multiorgasmic culture or society. Thus… as always… we are limited by the limitations of mono-orgasmic men together with their emotional and spiritual immaturity.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:35 AM
"I agree that such an open attitude of sexuality ought to exist… though until we can first develop a society wherein such openness will not open children up to being abused and exploited, such a society is simply not possible. When we live in a society where any such would have a parent thrown into prison for “child abuse,” … and where, all too often given the evil in society and the terrible attitudes too many men (especially men) have toward women and children, it is best we have the society we do that over-protects childhood. Yet… it is still so sad that this is what society has become."
Absolutely agree. But... Isn't it a vicious closed circle about a hen and her eggs? Parents are such dunces because they weren't educated and inhabited when they were children. And now they behave with their own children and grandchildren the same foolish ways as their parents and grandparents behaved with them. If we don't dare to change things in our own families, our children and children of our children are doomed too.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 9:44 AM
Yes… it is a vicious circle and cycle. And yet… the protection of children is the most important. And to have a sexually open home life with children will open them up to expressing their sexuality as openly outside the home and with other adults and other children their own age, who will not have the maturity to understand and… where adults are concerned… will likely take advantage of them for it. This endangers your children. And if authorities find out, they could take your children away and give them to foster families and throw you in prison. Then your sexualized children will be raised by adults who will really take advantage of them while you sit in prison.
You have to think these things through… instead of only wanting to have a sexually open family life, as exciting and arousing as that might seem to you, now. It requires you be more mature and realize the danger such a sexually open home life would create for your children and your home.
Sunday, November 3, 2013 3:36 PM
Can you say that the most intensive and pleasurable experiencing of your multiorgasmic capacities you had and you have exactly during your ejaculations? And that the most effective way of exercising and developing of your multiorgasmic capacities was previously and is now during your ejaculations as well?
So, during your ejaculations is your semen oozing, squeezing, dripping, seeping, propelling, or shooting out from the penis? Or every time it's different? Or when you were young it was shooting and now it's ejecting?..
Sunday, November 3, 2013 4:03 PM
"Yes… it is a vicious circle and cycle. And yet… the protection of children is the most important..."
Well... Lots, nicely and pretty a lot of families all over the world, including USA and especially in Europe, are able to maintain and preserve healthy openness and sincere relations in their families without any sort of falling into various perversions and endangering the integrity of their families as well as safety of their children. For sure, many of these families just keep traditions inherited from their parents and parents of their parents. But many of these families establish the new justice and order anew. Maybe everything is depending on consciousness of family members. And for sure, multiorgasmic life helps to awake consciousness of all family members a lot. If people are not blind in doing or not doing some things and realize all their sequences of their deeds they have a gain as a result. It's not only the practice that makes people blind and dead, it's also their deadly blindness. Maybe, it's not the best thing just to follow inner impulses and desires without knowing and feeling and seeing why do we have that or another mood and what invisible actors may stand at our backgrounds and enforce us to satisfy their intentions, hunger, and wishes. Life is a magic, and people are magicians. That's it.
Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:03 AM
Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:23 AM
Cute… but would be so much more arousing were that a bull. ;)
Tuesday, November 5, 2013 2:59 PM
Is it true that the most intensive and pleasurable experiencing of your multiorgasmic performance you had and you have exactly during your ejaculations? And that the most effective way of exercising and developing of his multiorgasmic capacities every man may have exactly while he is practicing his multiorgasmic ejaculations?
So, during your ejaculations is your semen oozing, squeezing, dripping, seeping, propelling, or shooting out from the penis? Or every time it's different? Or when you were young it was shooting and now it's ejecting?..
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:45 AM
That’s what I’ve been saying… yes. Prior to the age when I produced semen, the orgasmic experience was the same as it is now with the same orgasmic contractions.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 2:32 AM
Are you semen during your ejaculation:
-- oozing, or
-- squeezing, or
-- dripping, or
-- seeping, or
-- propelling, or
or shooting out?..
Was it shooting when you were young?..
Do you ejaculate every day now too?
How many ejaculations you have every time when you ejaculate?..
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 3:43 AM
You have asked me these questions before. The answer then, as now, is the same: it depends on how aroused I am and how much remaining semen I have. Yes, I orgasm (i.e., ejaculate) daily between 5–10 times, on average.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 6:59 AM
Now I got the answer. Thank you!
The next question I also posted before and didn't get the answer. This time I hope to get it. So, when you are alone or with a woman and before going on to next your stimulation and your orgasm, what are you doing with your semen that you ejaculate?.. Do you wipe it to dry with a paper-towels or just make you way in it?..
After you answer, I would tell you what the hero of one masterpiece of Chinese literature did in similar circumstances, he was sexually insatiable and multiorgasmic too.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 7:28 AM
I guess I don’t see the relevance of the question re: what I do with my semen when I ejaculate. If I’m with a woman, then it goes into her, obviously. Preferably, the woman swallows it. And if I’m not with a woman, then it goes onto a tissue or in the toilet or wherever I choose to ejaculate.
Why does this matter so much to you? You keep asking the same question.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 2:38 PM
Now you answered it completely. Thank you! I repeated my question because two weeks ago you said something general.
The reason I insisted on it was that I wanted to compare your behavior with Chinese literature character. Although I'm still trying to identify that piece of medieval novel that I read many years ago in Russian academic translation, as far as I remember, the young hero experienced powerful sensations copulating his young woman, released a lot of semen, then just carefully wiped it off to dry with a handkerchief (or maybe it was his woman who did it), and immediately after that he continued his thrusts, now with much heightened erection, feelings, and inspiration.
Besides, haven't you ever been confused that all the praises to delicious qualities of ejaculated semen to be consumed by women were made only by men, amateurs and scientists? None of married women, especially scientists including those who studied male sexual performance as well as multiple orgasms all their lives, to my concern, didn't share that sort of enthusiasm and didn't encourage other woman to engulf male's ejaculate.
Thursday, November 7, 2013 1:21 AM
Of which Chinese medieval literary character do you refer?
Thursday, November 7, 2013 2:52 AM
Probably, he was one from the novels by Li Yu. Or Jin Ping Mei?
Thursday, November 7, 2013 3:56 AM
Haven't you ever been confused that all the praises to delicious qualities of ejaculated semen to be consumed by women were made only by men -- amateurs and scientists?
None of married women, especially scientists -- including those who studied male sexual performance, seminal biochemistry, as well as multiple orgasms -- for some reasons didn't share that sort of enthusiasm and didn't encourage other women to engulf male's ejaculate.
Friday, November 8, 2013 2:41 AM
Is it something wrong, offensive, or rude for you with my question about what do you think that all the praises to delicious qualities of ejaculated semen to be consumed by women are made only by men and none of married women, especially scientists -- including those who studied male sexual performance, seminal biochemistry, as well as multiple orgasms -- for some reasons do not share that sort of enthusiasm and do not encourage other women to engulf male's ejaculate?..
Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:18 AM
Guess what is this girl so hard looking for?
Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:22 AM
I have no idea… but I’m enjoying looking at her. ;)
Saturday, November 9, 2013 6:58 AM
She is looking for what are you thinking about that none of women praises delicious qualities of ejaculated semen and encourages other women to swallow male's ejaculate?..
Saturday, November 9, 2013 9:19 PM
Really? You know her that well? That’s great! ;)
Sunday, November 10, 2013 3:56 AM
What is wrong with the question that I asked you four times and all four times you are just frightened to answer it? Does it hurt your ambitions?..
Sunday, November 10, 2013 4:54 AM
What question?
Sunday, November 10, 2013 7:23 AM
What do you think about that all the praises to delicious qualities of ejaculated semen to be consumed by women are made only by men?
None of married women, especially scientists -- including those who studied male sexual performance, seminal biochemistry, as well as multiple orgasms -- for some reasons didn't share that sort of enthusiasm and didn't encourage other women to engulf male's ejaculate.
Sunday, November 10, 2013 8:35 PM
I think the praises to semen being delicious are, obviously, not correct and, of course, promoted by men. There’s no doubt of this. However as you mentioned, there are certainly things men can do to make semen taste much better than it does… even up to tasting good. Now, that doesn’t mean that semen from an otherwise healthy man can’t be good for women to drink; that is a different subject and one you and I have talked about here.
Monday, November 11, 2013 2:46 AM
I think that "drink" wouldn't be the best choice for semen consumption. Although the semen seems to represent the unique formula of ingredients, it's not so easy to make that formula to work.
Have you ever tried to drink your semen? If you ever had, perhaps, then you may remember not at all healthy response of you organism on "eaten" semen. And I think that "doctors" who highly recommend semen as nutritional supplement never tried their semen by themselves. Whatever these "doctors" say, the raw ejaculated semen destroys woman's health and body because it's highly toxic. Just look at whores. Or at your women, you didn't rejuvenate any of them, you are just aging fast together.
We may praise the poison of snakes as unique formula too, rich in so many precious ingredients, proteins, and minerals. But would you drink that poison for your health? From the other hand, from the most poisonous snake poison may be produced extremely effective medications if we can subtract, mix, and intake what do we need in right proportions and concentrations.
After all, I didn't see any of movies where a woman really likes to "drink" semen and eventually wouldn't spit it out. It doesn't matter how much the actress was paid for her role or was it a wife who adores her husband so much, over all her smiles and passionate moans only one natural expression can be read on her face for obtained ejaculate -- disgust. It's not that a woman have bad taste -- she just follows her intuitive instincts and six sense. It's rather the raw semen has bad taste and properties even if it will be gotten from the sweetest and purest vegetarian who eats pineapples every day form the day he was born.
So, the only problem with semen is not that the semen is bad. The only problem that we are not learn naturally to produce and proceed it as the really laborious but delicious elixir. We are learn just to ejaculate it. In this form it's not much better than feces.
Monday, November 11, 2013 2:54 AM
I do not agree… and neither do many women. If you wish to view semen as feces, that is your choice, of course. However it is an opinion I do not share. And, frankly, neither do the research studies that show semen to be nutritionally and even psychologically beneficial to women.
We shall agree to disagree on this topic.
Monday, November 11, 2013 7:52 AM
Thank you. You've noticed just the word "feces" in all my text.
Monday, November 11, 2013 3:29 PM
Was that the only word you noticed of my reply?
Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:01 PM
I like your arguments "nutritionally and even psychologically beneficial to women". Nothing to dispute. And I'm not arguing at this topic any more because I totally agree that it's much better for a woman to have even something somehow from her beloved man rather than nothing. In these circumstances the quality of the semen is the future choice of a man and his women.
Well. What about the research, so far I came to the conclusion that although you have some interesting for scholars phenomenon in your orgastic performance, you are not also really the multiorgasmic man.
Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:36 PM
I'm very thankful to you for all your precious notices and comments you post for better understanding of male multiorgasmic phenomenon.
But why do you call yourself the truly multiorgasmic man if during, for example, the Rutgers Study you needed 4 minutes to achieve your second orgasm, 8 -- the third one, 6 -- the fourth, 8 -- the fifth, and 12 -- the sixth?.. Your are keeping your erection but your orgasmic response is inhibited for these minutes, it's your refractory period, and you can't do anything to that -- you can't experience your next orgasm without your next refractory period. As for me, we can call male orgasmic response truly multiorgasmic if male's choice to experience orgasm is absolutely under his will and control, and if he wants he may orgasmizing without interruption (or in several seconds intervals) as long as he wishes, just as some women and pre-adolescent boys.
I think that you were able to orgasmize with significantly shorter intervals (if you wished) or even without any interruptions before you started ejaculate. Is it true? Or you always -- as far as you remember -- needed some additional minutes of stimulation before having been able to go through your next orgasm?..
Monday, November 18, 2013 2:40 AM
The film to your collection:
http://www.noelfilms.com/films/limbo
Sunday, July 27, 2014 6:36 PM
Hi!
I've found where the article "Is kuriloce" i "is kurilovice" by Andzhej Poppe (Поппэ “Ис курилоцЪ” и “куриловицЪ”) was published.
Поппэ Анджей. «Ис Курилоцъ» и «Ис Куриловицъ» // IJSLP. – 1986. – Т.XXXI-XXXII (Issue XXXI-XXXII (1985)). - С.319-349.
IJSLP - International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics
https://slavica.indiana.edu/journalListings/olderJournals/International_Journal_Slavic_IssueXXXI_XXXII
They have one copy at NYPL too:
http://catalog.nypl.org/search~S1?/sInternational+journal+of+slavic+linguistics+and+poetics
I'm in Kiev now. If you are still interesting in origins of Father Upir' Likhyj, I'll make a copy of that article when I come back to New York.
I would check also catalogs of Kiev's libraries.
Did you email to Lubov' Stolyarova?
